User talk:OohBunnies!/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:OohBunnies!. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Unreliable sources?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Douglass_Burns_Clarke - Hi OohBunnies! Our entry for Douglass Burns Clarke was refused because of unreliable sources. As we are the Records Management and Archives of Concordia University, everything that goes up on our Website is verified and as all the references are from our site, they can be trusted. Concordia University is one of the major universities in the Province of Quebec and in Canada. The three archivists part of the Historical Archives’ team total almost 75 years of experience. If sources from an Archives can’t be trusted, we don’t know what can! What are your thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmaa.concordia (talk • contribs) 14:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Woodforce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Woodforce Hi OohBunnies, I really need somebodies help on this article, I have read all guidelines within Wikipedia, this is the first article I have ever tried to upload. I am trying to write this article from a non bias way and bring in no advertising references or slant as best I can, I am now uncertain what more I can do. This is a product that has been invented by an government agency tasked with finding environmental solutions to an issue that concerns us all. it has been checked and approved by a number of other government agencies as well as patent authorities, USDA being the latest example of full approval of this product and because of this it has to be given a commercial name, I have tried to follow an example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla_Glass as best I can without the financial backing of Corning, how can Gorilla glass not be classed as an advertisement yet Woodforce is. I am asking for your help as this really is a material that can change the future. Do we need more additions from Scion, however they will all cite back to their website, we have lots of independent research but again will either be on Scion or Woodforce Websites. Once this is public more references can then be added to it, again I point back to the Gorilla Glass entry. Cchambonnet (talk) 09:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Responded on user's talk page. OohBunnies! (talk) 09:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- thats really helpful, I think the penny has finally dropped. Well back to the drawing board, or Wiki page to be precise. Is it possible for you to review my amendments once I have made them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cchambonnet (talk • contribs)
Rejected article
Hi OohBunnies! I am a newby to wikipedia but am trying to update wikipedia's performance art entries with current artists and new movements, for some reason we are missing a lot of developments beyond about 1998. This is my first page, written about Anya Liftig, a well-known artist. Any advice you can give me about how to effectively discuss art work without it sounding promotional would be helpful, a lot of the articles I'd like to cite are complimentary,.,I am carefully only including artists who are considered relevant and have reached a certain level of recognition...I have also noted levels for sports players and musicians, which is a considerably lower "bar" than that used to judge artists, I hope to encourage critical arts writers especially in visual arts performance to get involved with wikipedia and help out a lot of students and make art more widely accessible in daily life...thank you, all the best,(Esthermneff (talk) 00:50, 10 December 2012 (UTC))
Hi OohBunnies! Many thanks for looking at my article - I'm just not sure how to proceed now. The reason for rejection was copyright infringement, but everything I wrote was factual and I'm not sure how else to say what I need to say. It was not copied from the Spinal Research website but was based around the information found there. Do you have any thoughts on how I can move forward? Thanks Jodie JLWallin (talk) 10:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Responded on user's talk page. OohBunnies! (talk) 10:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Citations
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Posen Foundation - Hi OohBunnies! I'm not sure how I can improve this page with more reliable sources since I've already added references. Can you give me any more guidance with this. The reality of the situation is that most of the references I mentioned are connected to our foundation which does not necessarily make them any less credible. Thanks for your time working on our page! Heather Chait (talk) 15:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- Responded on user's talk page. OohBunnies! (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks so much for responding so promptly! I've made a few minor changes and I'm wondering if these will suffice or do I need to add additional sources. Not entirely clear when the critical mass will be reached to make the article 'noteworthy.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heather Chait (talk • contribs) 15:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Not censored reply
Regarding your comment on your user page: If you really do find you would like to reply with that quote often, you know you can always make a sub-page (such as User talk:OohBunnies!/nc, copy in the quote and attribution, and then whenever you want to say that, you can simply subst by typing {{subst:User talk:OohBunnies!/nc}}. Of course, it might be more useful (and less likely to annoy people with long repetitive posts) if you make an essay based on the quote, modeled after WP:TIGER. Then others could reference it also. KillerChihuahua?!? 13:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestions, although when I said, "If I could make that an auto-response to every person that complains about images of nudity or articles on pornography, I would." it was probably more hyperbole than anything else. Mostly because I don't often find myself on the talk pages of articles with "explicit" content. (Not that there's any reason for that. I mean, I'm not offended by them or anything, it's just the way it is. ...Why am I still talking? *hops away*) OohBunnies! (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Nods, I thought you might be using hyperbole, but wasn't certain, hence my "IF you.. find" etc. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Woodforce
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Woodforce Hi OohBunnies, would it be possible to have a look over this page, I have found a couple of independent documents supporting this technology and have changed all copy to reflect your suggestions of impartiality and have included one independent press review for support. If you could advise before I put forward again for review it would be really appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cchambonnet (talk • contribs) 19:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
woodforce update
Hi OohBunnies should I just release for checking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cchambonnet (talk • contribs) 09:14, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Holiday cheer
|
Holiday Cheer | |
| Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be a newbie, a good friend, someone you have had disagreements with in the past, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!
| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi OohBunnies!! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Apology for embarassing you
Hello. Please read this msg b4 del it in case u do decide to. Im Sid alias MegaCyanide666, ThePariahOne, Mr Sylvester Cross and many other names that I have forgotten. This time I haven't created an account for spamming but to apologise for my irrational behaviour. You of course know I didn't have any issues but was just spamming you. I'm sorry I've insulted you or embarresed you in front of people. I'm not trying to offend you here but I spammed you because I thought you're just a women and you're weak and you can do nothing to me. But now I know my behaviour was totally out of limits even for a spammer and my attitude towards women was totally unforgivable. I've insulted and embarrased you in front of everyone. Hope I'm forgiven although I don't think that's going to be. I've realised my fault. I'm not asking you to unblock me, I don't deserve it anyway but just forgive me if you can. I'm truly sorry. I was out of my limits. Please forgive me. I promise I won't spam or use a sock again to spam anyone again and I'll try not to disrespect anyone again. Thank you and sorry again. SuperPariahNerd (talk) 05:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:39, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland
I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Delivered at 12:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
your help please
Hi OohBunnies!
My novel 'Monster: a novel of Frankenstein' was released last Fall and received a good amount of critical acclaim, including a starred review from Booklist Magazine, being made a pick of the week from ForeWord Magazine, a rave reviews from the Los Angeles Times and other papers. It was also picked recently by Booklist for their 2013 top 10 horror novel list and by WBUR (NPR Boston) as one of their favorite books of 2012.
I tried adding the following entry in the novels section for the 'Frankenstein in popular culture' page
- 2012: Dave Zeltserman's Monster: a novel of Frankenstein was selected by Booklist for their 2013 list of top 10 horror novels[1] and WBUR for their favorite novels of 2012[2], and is a thematically rich gothic retelling of the original story in which everything a dying Victor Frankenstein tells Captain Walton is a lie and the monster now tells the true story. ISBN 978-1-5902-0860-1
And Mr.Ollie without explanation removed it. If I had added blurbs from any of the newspaper reviews, I could see this entry inappropriate and promotional, but seeing how I stuck to the facts, that the references provided are valid, and from the critical responses that the book has received, I believe this entry is very valid--and as much so as any of the other novel entries. Could you please help me get this entry accepted?
Thanks, DaveZeltserman (talk) 18:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)DaveZeltserman
References
- ^ Booklist Magazine 2013 Top 10 Horror Fiction
- ^ WBUR Favorite Books of 2012
Hi There!
I just wanted to say, I remember you, and I appreciate you for the way you jumped into a disagreement I was stuck in, on my User Talk page, sometime about one year ago, and you helped me find my way to a peaceful resolution. And you gave me my first (and thus-far only) Barnstar! (Fortunately, I don't care very much about acquiring Barnstars. But when you have just the one, it's very special!) You really did help out without taking my "side" of the argument, and I'm glad you did. SO . . . I hope you're doing great! Best of wishes to you!
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis
AFC Backlog Drive
Hello, OohBunnies!:
WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Long time no see!
I miss seeing you around! Drop by my talk page if you're still here! --Pine✉ 07:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello OohBunnies!! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
- This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
Hello OohBunnies!:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and happy new year
gone a year
You haven't edited in a year; hope you're doing well. Herostratus (talk) 01:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Nice to see you back on Wikipedia. How are your bunnies? Pine✉ 00:49, 18 November 2016 (UTC) |
- I don't have any bunnies, only a very fluffy, very old, very lazy cat. And he's fine. Thanks for your message :) OohBunnies! (talk) 01:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, OohBunnies!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, OohBunnies!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, OohBunnies!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)