Archiving

edit

I see you archived your whole talk page. Does this mean you fixed everything the bots say you broke? Philafrenzy (talk) 00:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sanitary sewer

edit

Much of the material in your recent edit of subject article appears to be more appropriate for the combined sewer article. Please take a look at the combined sewer article to verify the difference; and move the material as you see fit. In the absence of objections, I intend to purge confusing combined sewer descriptions from the sanitary sewer article.Thewellman (talk) 00:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The two systems share a common history - it's only recently that combined sewers have been split. That doesn't mean that the general history isn't equally applicable to both, though. I have transferred to combined sewer.Noodleki (talk) 11:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fixing things you broke

edit

Could you confirm that you have fixed all the broken things that have been swept into your archive. I hope it is not out of sight, out of mind! Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

I hope you haven't been able to sleep, terrorized by frightening images of ghostly disambiguation links (!). All those broken things have indeed been nursed back to health, and they promise to be good.Noodleki (talk) 12:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
I am glad to know that you are being thoughtful in all your actions here and tidying up after yourself. You are not operating in isolation. Good luck. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Welfare capitalism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • had over their housing and commercial opportunities. A noted example was [[Pullman, Illinois]]] — a site of a strike that destroyed the town in 1894. During these years, disputes between

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Toy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Hoop, John Spilsbury, America and Peter Hodgson
History of statistics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Regression, Charles Booth and T distribution
History of surgery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Joseph Lister, Ligation and Ligature
Orthopedic surgery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to John Hunter, Battlefield and Territorial Army
Welfare capitalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Redundancy, Lowell and Wirral
Airborne leaflet propaganda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Axis and Hindenburg
History of psychiatric institutions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Enlightenment and Toledo
LGBT social movements (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to ITV and GLF
Surgery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Joseph Lister and Ligation
Art criticism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Neo-classical
Art museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Church
Dieting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Cheyne
Harpoon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Humpback
Hotel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tremont House
Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rail
Power projection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fleet
Statistics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Regression

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 25 December

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

British bias much?

edit

It's one thing to add content to push a POV, but it's another thing entirely to remove sourced content along the way to help push it. Let's not play this game again, okay? Curly Turkey (gobble) 00:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Haven't you been blocked enough times? Read WP:DUE. Your expansions are extraordinarily unbalanced and fantastically out of the approriate context. and you keep distorting content (deemphasizing Japanese and European contributions). And seriously—The Dandy, The Beano, and Comic Cuts are all so important that they must be in the lead, but the Lascaux caves and 13th-century Japanese origins are not? You can actually defend this? Curly Turkey (gobble) 03:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Firstly, I am getting tired with your extreme levels of aggression. Try to have a civil discussion. You've also quietly dropped your earlier (false) charges. Now, about that civil discussion. dandy and beano can be removed if you object, although I don't think Lascaux caves or medieval Japanese work should be there either, as they are not comics at all (they go in a section called 'precursors'). Do you find it extraordinarily unbalanced that I'm adding content on English comics, where before there was literally nothing? Despite the sources I have given demonstrating that the medium in fact developed there? You accuse me of deemphasizing European contributions. Now for some of those beastly facts. I actually added two paras on Topffer and Busch. This isn't 'pushing a POV' - its adding sourced facts.Noodleki (talk) 11:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
And what POV, pray, am I pushing? In case you hadn't noticed, the entire first paragraph of the "English-language comics" was about British comics. "Despite the sources I have given demonstrating that the medium in fact developed [in England]" only proves you're POV pushing.
"During the 1950s and 1960s the most popular comic magazine for older age-group boys was the Eagle published by Hulton Press. The Eagle was published in a more expensive format, and was a gravure-printed weekly. This format was one used originally by Mickey Mouse Weekly during the 1930s.": what business does this have in an article that is an overview of the medium? This kind of thing belongs in a history of British comics, not in the Comics article—and is pretty much the only kind of thing you've added to the article, paragraph after diluted paragraph. Sentences such as "The first modern weekly comic was Ally Sloper's Half Holiday, which debuted in the British humour magazine Judy in 1867 and was created by Charles H. Ross and illustrated by his French wife Emilie de Tessier." are filled with trivial details that are amazingly beyond irrelevant to the scope of the article.
The "sources" you added are ridiculously poor quality—an article from a Scottish newspaper proudly proclaiming the importance of the Glasgow Looking Glass? What on earth was wrong with the book source I had added, one that talks about the Looking Glass in the context of the development of comics (and which you removed?!? Seriously?!?)?
"as they are not comics at all": The fact that you don't think the Lascaux caves are important is less than irrelevant—reliable sources, and plenty of them, talk about the Lascaux caves, either to support the claim or to refute it, and what you or I think is beside the point.
Bottom line: a five-paragraph section proclaiming the undeniable importance of British comics is mindbogglingly over the top—and the five paragraphs you added did a remarkably poor, tangent-laden job of doing it. The images you added also violate MOS:IMAGELOCATION and are unjustified "Fair Use" images (no rationale would be sufficient to keep them), and the Old Bumblehead is dumped into the article entirely without any supporting context.
Oh, and even after being told to take it to the talk page, you've opted instead to continue edit warring. Over poorly-sourced, poorly-written, poorly-organized, meandering garbage content. I'm flabbergasted. Curly Turkey (gobble) 14:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
On top of that, we get this garbage: "The first British comic strip was The Glasgow Looking Glass, published in 1826". The Looking Glass was not a comic strip, it was an illustrated humour magazine (like Punch). So now you're not only bollocksing up the article with UNDUE and POV pushing, you're actually spreading misinformation in a particularly prominent place. Of course, if I raised a finger to fix up your mess I'd be accused of editwarring, so I'll have to stay my hand. Curly Turkey (gobble) 14:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You are an unbelievably rude individual.Noodleki (talk) 14:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Meaning you refuse to address the mountain if issues your edits have wrought, and you intend to hold tenaciously to your POV and have no intention of discussing it. Curly Turkey (gobble) 21:38, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
If you take a few deep breaths and calm down, then I would be happy to. It is the Season of good cheer, so try to be cheerful.Noodleki (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Then prove your good faith by undoing your changes and bringing your concerns to the talk page. Curly Turkey (gobble) 21:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
How about you cool off in the shower for a bit. An apology would be nice as well. The Looking Glass is actually called a comic in the sources provided, by the way. I would respectfully suggest examining your own bollocks. You can do that in the shower, if you want, and kill two birds with one stone. Or you can "Stay your hand", instead. Excelllent biblical ring to that. Nice.  :) Noodleki (talk) 22:11, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
As I've already pointed out to you, the Looking Glass was already in the article, and with a high-quality source that puts it in its proper context—not some fluff newspaper article making boisterous claims to garner clicks—and you've inexplicably removed the source! Anyways, you've made it crystal clear that you have no intention of discussing this on the talk page, only pushing your POV and making lame wisecracks. Curly Turkey (gobble) 22:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay, you've now made a series of false accusations, which I have rebutted. This, though, does not deter you in your onslaught. So, again, deep breath, count to ten. Now go to the comics page, and notice that an august selection of sources has in fact been provided. I have also rearranged the piccies and added a Fair use rationale - I've even removed the info that had you tearing your hair out all over the keyboard. I would have to tentatively disagree on one issue; the identity of the author and illustrator of the first modern comic is not "amazingly beyond irrelevant" - I think it is quite germane. Although it may be difficult for you, try to be constructive, balanced and objective. Peace.Noodleki (talk) 23:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

"The identity of the author and illustrator of the first modern comic" is a source of heated debate impossible to determine, as the definition of "comics" has never been determined—as the article itself goes into. You think it's "germane" for an article to contradict itself? It would be extraordinarily easy to find another candidate for "first comics"—there are plenty of claims, including the Lascaux caves, Bayeux tapestry, Hogarth's works, etc etc etc, and plenty of far stricter counterclaims that would deny that Cruikshank's works were comics at all. Everyone's got an opinion, and everyone is sure that their own opinion is the only valid one, which is why at Wikipedia we only report the conflicting claims, we don't take sides with any of them, as you are doing.
Ever read WP:BRD? You made a BOLD edit, I reverted it—the next step is to discuss, not to editwar. You still refuse to take it to the talk page, and instead choose to push your POV and refuse to explain why you've removed reliable sources and content. Curly Turkey (gobble) 23:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hmmm. Paleolithic cavemen wrote the first modern comic, did they. Look 'modern' up in a dictionary. The sources are explicit. Looking Glass predates topffer et al. There 'are' no other alternatives. I have removed no content. It's interesting how you lurch from one accusation to another like an out-of-control locomotive barreling down the hill. I try to patiently correct you, but this just enrages you further. I really don't know if I'm getting through to you at all. Cheerio.Noodleki (talk) 00:04, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

What part of "stricter counterclaims that would deny that Cruikshank's works were comics at all" is giving you comprehension difficulties? Curly Turkey (gobble) 00:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Let's take this to the talk page.Noodleki (talk) 00:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
There's an idea that never would have crossed my mind! Curly Turkey (gobble) 01:06, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Have reverted your changes. Bring it to the talk page and get consensus. You may be blocked if you continue edit warring. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copy and paste without attribution

edit

In this edit [1]

You added "British efforts at reform may have been influenced by the imperial examinations system of China. Thomas Taylor Meadows, Britain's consul in Guangzhou, China argued in his Desultory Notes on the Government and People of China, published in 1847, that "the long duration of the Chinese empire is solely and altogether owing to the good government which consists in the advancement of men of talent and merit only," and that the British must reform their civil service by making the institution meritocratic."

Which is very much similar to "Thomas Taylor Meadows, Britain's consul in Guangzhou, China. Meadows successfully argued in his Desultory Notes on the Government and People of China, published in 1847, that "the long duration of the Chinese empire is solely and altogether owing to the good government which consists in the advancement of men of talent and merit only," and that the British must reform their civil service by making the institution meritocratic." [2]

You did this without attribution which is copyright infringement and was against your unblock agreement.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

You are a twit. That text is from the original Civil service article which I removed by mistake. This is now your third malicious attempt at getting me banned, yet you persist in making a fool of yourself. But, you won't apologize, will you.Noodleki (talk) 00:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ah yes it was here before, you are correct.[3] In your massive, continuous and disruptive moving of content it is very hard to follow what you are doing. Additionally your not using an edit summary makes it hard to follow aswell. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Right, no apology and it was my fault. A) Get your facts right before hurling accusations. B) Do it again, and I will make a formal complaint, as this borders on harassment.Noodleki (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes taking this to ANI may be useful. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sewage treatment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Romans, Environment and Salford
Steamroller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Rochester, Hyde Park and Chatham
Civil service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Stafford Northcote and Charles Trevelyan
Government budget (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Peer and William Pulteney
Activated sludge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Environment
Armored car (military) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Quadricycle
Armoured fighting vehicle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Quadricycle
Beauty pageant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Creole
History of comics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Judy
Movie camera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Science Museum
Unemployment benefits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Labour Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

History of submarines

edit

Although I appreciate your effort of History of submarines, I must admit that I am less happy with the 13 links to disambiguation pages that you have created. Could you fix those links as soon as possible? The Banner talk 21:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done.Noodleki (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! The Banner talk 00:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Famine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the electric vehicle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to War photography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:Felice Beato (British, born Italy - (Interior of the Angle of Taku North Fort Immediately After Its Capture by

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
For your contributions to the Famine article and many other contributions to Wikipedia. gidonb (talk) 18:04, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of capitalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Credit, Abraham Darby, Transatlantic cable, Manager and Surplus
Interior design (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Crystal Palace, Ismail Pasha, Chrome and Catalog
Neoclassical architecture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Hamilton, Chippendale, William Chambers and James Adam
Submarine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Port Arthur, Dupuy de Lôme and Motor
Capitalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Transatlantic cable and Surplus
Prison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sailing vessel and Whipping
Bureaucracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Absolutism
Famine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Charity
History of film technology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Film projection
History of glass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lehr
History of swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Native Americans
Precursors of film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Film projection
Swimming (sport) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Native Americans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Tesla Roadster for you!

edit
  A Tesla Roadster for you!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Tesla Roadster for you!

edit
  A Tesla Roadster for you!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of liberalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Enlightenment, Absolutism, Asylum, Galicia, Whig, Thomas Gordon and Unemployment Insurance Act
Historiography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Charles V, State, William H. McNeill and William Robertson
Liberalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Enlightenment, Absolutism, Asylum and Galicia
Nursing home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Medicare, Bath, Grooming and Dressing
Historian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Charles V, William H. McNeill and William Robertson
Standard diving dress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Charles Mackintosh, Edward Barnard and John Deane
Underwater diving (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Scuba, Edward Barnard and John Deane
Computer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to National Physical Laboratory and Z3
Diving helmet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Edward Barnard and John Deane
Diving suit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Charles Mackintosh and Decompression
History of insurance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Ticket and Hydrant
History of lighthouses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Carolina and Transatlantic
History of water filters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mercury and Laurel
Marine salvage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to John Deane and Charles Deane
Piracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to John Rackham and United Provinces
Surface-supplied diving (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Edward Barnard and John Deane
Atmospheric diving suit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alexander Gordon
Chinatown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Providence
Cruise ship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Syracuse
Disability insurance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ticket
History of labour law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indicator
History of programming languages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to English
History of water supply and sanitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hyde Park
House numbering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Post
Lighthouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Transatlantic
Programming language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to English
Scuba diving (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Scuba
Scuba set (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Scuba
Sidewalk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Romans
Terrorism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Romans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Psychiatry edits

edit

I'm not an expert on the history of psychiatry but I probably know more than the average bear, and my impression is that your edits (08:34, 13 January 2014) improved the coverage, accuracy, sourcing, and flow of the Psychiatry article. Nice work! :o) Mark D Worthen PsyD 00:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agriculture history

edit

Noodleki, while I appreciate your enthusiasm, please stop with your massive changes to the history section of the Agriculture article. This section (and its subsections) has been carefully crafted through extensive talk page discussion, using high quality sources, in an attempt to take the article to GA and possibly FA status. By replacing it with the information that was previously in the History of agriculture article, you are destroying the flow, sourcing and comprehensiveness of the section. The history section of the Agriculture article is much better than the History of agriculture article previously was - that much we agree on. That is because I have worked extensively on the Agriculture article as a whole, while no-one has put such effort into the History of agriculture article. The solution in this situation is to improve the History of agriculture article, not replace major sections of the Agriculture article with what is in many cases unsourced trivia. You have been bold, I have reverted, now please discuss, per WP:BRD. Dana boomer (talk) 00:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I originally moved the content after noticing that the agriculture article was more detailed than the history article, which is obviously ridiculous.

The reason we have history of... articles, is to be more comprehensive. Now, as the article stands, there is a vast amount of info on Bronze Age, Iron Age, in china, europe middle east and so on, and virtually nothing on the agricultural revolution. There are 2 major events in ag history - its invention, and the unprecedented expansion in production that ocurred from 1700-1900. It was one of the defining events that made the industrial revolution, and the modern world, possible and is of extreme importance, far more than large amounts of info on different regional histories, which all faced the same subsistence barriers throughout history. Here and some literature on this important topic.

There needs to be mention of the following fundamental points: enclosure, crop rotation, commercialization, mechanization, breeding, fertilizers. Regional histories of antiquity should mainly be in the history article.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Public health (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Plague, Joseph Lister and James Carroll
War photography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Charles Napier, Balaclava and Light Brigade
Forensic science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Displacement and Azizul Haque
Psychiatry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Enlightenment and Depression
Aerial reconnaissance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bleriot
Corporation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Incorporation
History of labour law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Signalling
Lawn mower (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pitch
Photojournalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Media
Shopping (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Strand
Special forces (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SAS
Undercover operation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Superintendent
Veterinary physician (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lyons

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shoemaking, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ash, Groove and Tack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frederick Rutland concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frederick Rutland, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hospital ship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Scutari and Balaclava
Hospital train (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Balaclava

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Electric boat may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The world's first fleet of electric launches for hire, with a chain of electrical charging station]]s, was established along the [[River Thames]] in the 1880s. An 1893 pleasure map of the Thames

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roll-on/roll-off may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1939-1945'', Vol 3 Amphibious Warfare Vessels And Auxiliaries. ISBN 0-85177-675-2|pages=142-143}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bathing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • water [[Public bathing|public wash house]] was opened in May 1842.<ref name=ArthurAshpitel1851>{{citation | first = Arthur |last=Ashpitel | year = 1851 | title = Observations on baths and wash-
  • soap (by pouring water over or soaking one's body, etc.) [''membersihkan tubuh dng air dan sabun (dng cara menyiramkan, merendamkan diri ke air, dsb.''] p.871|}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Consumer cooperative may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • accessdate=2008-06-26|work=Co-operative Grocer|publisher=[National Cooperative Grocers Association]], Minneapolis}}</ref> As the mechanization of the Industrial Revolution was forcing more and more

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shell (projectile) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • filled with molten iron and was used against enemy warships. It replaced the use of red hot shot (notably used at the [[Great Siege of Gibraltar]] in 1782. Two patterns of incendiary shell were

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Landing craft may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • a 12 ton tank, but the ISTDC, anticipating weight increases in future tank models specified 16 [[[[Builder's Old Measurement#American tons burthen|tons burthen]] for Mechanised Landing Craft
  • improvements have been made. For example, landing craft such as the [[LCM-8]] of the [[US Navy]]) are capable of a military lift of 183 metric tons at a speed of 22&nbsp;km/h, carrying even

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Swordsmanship may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • art of swordsmanship which they had previously had to go the [Continental Europe|continent]] to learn, and also set up a riding school in the former rear garden of the house. He was fencing
  • more than its use as a killing art, particularly in his influential book 'L’École des armes'' (1763; ''The School of Fencing''.<ref name="Evangelista"/> According to the ''Encyclopædia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cremation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to William Price
Match (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Antimony sulphide

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Painter

edit

Thanks for the change on the painter. I only changed it to North Korean born because that made much more sense than "Korean-born South Korean" Correctron (talk) 02:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Though I haven't looked at in depth, it seems like you've made this article better by your recent extensive editing. I wish you had first said something about it on the talk page. Lou Sander (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 12 June

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gun laying (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Spring, Muzzle, Quadrant and William Armstrong
Shell (projectile) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mortar, Cannonball and Oblong
Bathing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Moctezuma and Cortés
Ethical movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Felix Adler
History of libraries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Zeno
National library (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George II
Rifled breech loader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cartridge
Secular humanism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Felix Adler
Subscription library (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Share

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Librarian

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Librarian, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Since a librarian is not specific to only public libraries, it is best to keep the information in its respective article. The Public libraries in North America article may include information to direct a user to the appropriate article. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 13:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I might suggest moving Librarians in North America to its own page. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Okay, then.Noodleki (talk) 15:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. User:Steve Lux, Jr. - How about renaming Public libraries in North America as History of libraries in North America as a more general topic. The existing article is also limited to historical aspects.Noodleki (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
In which case would go against your entire point of undue weight in the Librarian article. I don't believe in making an article more generic, especially in this instance. Public libraries in North America is not intended to include all types of libraries. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

go against your entire point of undue weight in the Librarian article - Don't understand what you mean. I think articles should certainly be generic - this is exactly what an encyclopedia should do: generalize a variety of related things. I also made the Public libraries in North America article to begin with. Never mind, I'll move to Librarians in North America as you suggested.Noodleki (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

If you have a substantial amount of information in an article, making it its own article and directing users to it would be good. Like I said, and I believe you are starting to agree, if librarians in North America have enough history and information, then making it an individual article would be a positive improvement. Thank you for your time and understanding. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Landing craft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to IX Corps and LCA
Academic freedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Five Year Plan
Scientific freedom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Five Year Plan
Transatlantic flight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Edward Beatty

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fencing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Posture and Parry
Historical reenactment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Blackheath and Zulu
History of fencing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Posture and Parry
Swordsmanship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Posture and Parry
Seal hunting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slaughterhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rail. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate copies from articles

edit

Whoa... please stop. These massive duplicate copies you are making from one fishing article to another ([4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]) are over the top, and need careful consideration. It's already going to take a lot of work from other editors establishing what is and what is not appropriate from the copies you have already made. --Epipelagic (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fishing
added links pointing to Scarborough, Hull, Yarmouth, Seaside and George Snyder
Blood transfusion
added links pointing to Medical Research Council and Vatican
Fishing rod
added links pointing to Reed and Lancewood
Fly fishing
added links pointing to Seaside and George Snyder
Free love
added links pointing to Radicalism and Bernard Shaw
Blood bank
added a link pointing to Medical Research Council
Fishing reel
added a link pointing to George Snyder
History of Antarctica
added a link pointing to Plaque
History of abortion
added a link pointing to Midlands
Mortar (weapon)
added a link pointing to IRA
Recreational fishing
added a link pointing to Seaside
Territorial claims in Antarctica
added a link pointing to Plaque

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gold extraction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Habashi, Fathi [http://www.ucv.ve/cifi/16%5CArticuloh.htm Recent Advances in Gold Metallurgy]</ref>)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hand grenade
added links pointing to Port Arthur, Grip, G.I., Sunderland and William Mills
Scientific revolution
added links pointing to Mine, William Gilbert and Laws of motion
Right of revolution
added links pointing to William III and Absolutism
Gold cyanidation
added a link pointing to Rand
Gold extraction
added a link pointing to Rand
History of tobacco
added a link pointing to Columbus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gas holder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's Cross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Counterintelligence
added a link pointing to Kim
Signals intelligence in modern history
added a link pointing to Stockton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Noodleki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply