note

edit

You are not talking and are just reverting. You are about to get blocked for edit warring. If your goal is to improve the article, you cannot do that while you are blocked. So please start talking. Jytdog (talk) 01:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Laura Owen  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 01:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to do this. I have been trying to get you to talk but you just deleted everything here instead of talking. Jytdog (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The link is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Loveconquers1_reported_by_User:Jytdog_.28Result:_.29 Jytdog (talk) 02:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

bot notice

edit
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Laura Owen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Laura Owen was changed by Loveconquers1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979117 on 2015-01-08T02:10:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:10, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

another warning

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Laura Owen with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 02:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

really, you can Talk!

edit

Instead of just deleting and leaving angry notes, you can talk calmly, like a person. I opened a section for you to explain why you are unhappy, here: Talk:Laura_Owen#Upset_editor Jytdog (talk) 02:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Last warning

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Loveconquers1. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ... discospinster talk 02:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK, so you are maybe Laura Owen

edit

based on this note, you claim to be Laura Owen. Maybe that is true, maybe not.. we have no way of knowing here. But what is certain, is that you are getting nowhere, as you have been acting, right? And you are about to get blocked, which will really silence you. There are ways that people can object to articles about themselves, but I have no way of helping you if you won't talk like a human. So please, talk back already, please. Jytdog (talk) 02:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

too late. you've been blocked already. Look you can email me (go to my userpage and click on "email this user" and I can try to help you. but calm down already, please. Jytdog (talk) 02:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
note to discospinster - this user appeared be socking earlier today as 2601:2:481:21:ACB4:D1B9:74FB:7C14 and H1n1fluvirus.. those accounts may pop up. Jytdog (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Jytdog: Open an investigation here. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi ToonLucas22 I am aware of SPI. I am holding back from going to the boards to see how this resolves. The user is still acting irrationally (created two new socks last night, White20201 and Bullshit2014, continuing the same behavior). Am looking for her to move out of crisis mode and start talking before taking any action on the WP:SOCKs. Jytdog (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveconquers1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

no vandalism

Decline reason:

If unblocked, are you going to continue to make edits like this? PhilKnight (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.