Longrangerinthesky
Welcome!
editHello, Longrangerinthesky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sagecandor (talk) 13:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Astra (missile). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
There is no revision. There is only edition from my side. I see people like Bilcat reverting unnecessarily. Do you add the warning to his page?Longrangerinthesky (talk) 13:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Astra (missile) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIronIV 13:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Longrangerinthesky reported by User:ScrapIronIV (Result: ). Thank you. Scr★pIronIV 13:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
editThis is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:ScrapIronIV, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Scr★pIronIV 13:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 14:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)- Do not add that image back. It is misleading and not representative of "facts". It is an improper image to use in that article based on policy, not my editorial perspective. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 15:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)