Jonnymoon96

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jonnymoon96! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 18:17, Sunday, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your request at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, TLSuda (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Jonnymoon96! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:57, Monday, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

RenWeb

Greetings. I reverted your addition of an Articles for Deletion tag to RenWeb. I did so because no followup work was done. Your tag linked to the old AfD discussion page from 2007, whereas a subsequent AfD nomination would need to link to a new discussion page ("Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/nominatedpage (2nd nomination)" for instance). You would need to provide your justification for the nomination on that new page. You would also need to add the page to a daily log page for the benefit of those who follow such discussions.

If you wish to pursue this further, please read WP:AFDHOWTO, especially the instructions for a second nomination. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Thanks, and happy editing! --Finngall ^talk 13:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Adblock Plus  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I am deleting this message in the manner prescribed by Wikipedia guidelines (strike through) because you explained the removal of content was a mistake made while you were adding content. This is shown to be true since you have added content in the past. Thanks for letting me know (and a barnstar was not needed to do so though I appreciate that these are harder to come by nowadays). Donner60 (talk) 03:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Adventist Today

Just to let you know, once an article has had a PROD and it has been removed it can never have a PROD again. Adventist Today had a prod and it was removed so your PROD was invalid. This must go to WP:AFD if you believe it should be deleted. - GB fan 14:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I see the same thing on Spectrum (magazine), this had a PROD that was also removed. - GB fan 14:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of All rights reversed

Hello Jonnymoon96. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of All rights reversed as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because it is only for articles on real persons or groups, individual animals, organisations, web content and organised events. This article's topic is not within the ambit of that list. Adam9007 (talk) 04:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional open source

Hi Jonnymoon96, I closed the AFD for Professional open source as Speedy Keep because there was no valid argument for deletion advanced. You may find WP:DEL-REASON and WP:Before helpful before nominating articles for deletion again.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  07:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposal for a page

Dear Jonnymoon96,

As previously you have contributed to Wikipedia in regards to financial articles, would you, please, consider writing an article on Creamfinance? It is a global financial services company that provides personal finance products in emerging markets. The company was ranked as the second fastest-growing company in Europe in 2016. Creamfinance is employing over 220 people and operating in 7 countries both within and outside of Europe – Latvia, Poland, Czech Republic, Georgia, Denmark and Mexico with an IT office in Austria.

I believe it corresponds to the Wikipedia notability rules as it has been talked about in legitimate third party sources:

References

If you wish I have put together a first draft for the page and can send it you.

According to Wikipedia guidelines I want to underline that I am a Project Manager at Golin Riga and I have been approached by Creamfinance to help with their representation on Wikipedia. Aozolins-golin-riga (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

VPNbook

As an experienced user, I'd advise you to be more careful when you propose a deletion of an article, especially if the article meets Wikipedia guidelines for notability. Kind regards, Vs⁶₅⁰⁷ 01:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Tofutti

Hello Jonnymoon96, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Tofutti, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. - MrX 18:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: The Trevor Project

Hello Jonnymoon96, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of The Trevor Project, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. - MrX 18:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop nominating articles for speedy deletion

Please don't nominate any more article for G11 deletion until you fully understand WP:CSD#G11. You are making too may mistakes and creating a lot of unnecessary extra work for others. Please get a second opinion from an admin or one of the regulars at WP:NPP if you think a particular article should be speedily deleted. Thank you.- MrX 21:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Jirnexu

Hello Jonnymoon96, thank you for reviewing the page. I am contesting the speedy deletion of Jirnexu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I have carefully reviewed the article, and the criterion does not warrant speedy deletion. In my opinion the tone is neutral, based on fact and verified by reliable, well established third-party news sources, including TechCrunch and VentureBeat, two of the world’s leading news outlets, with 10s of millions of readers. If you or other editors would like to provide specific feedback on how it does not meet Wikipedia’s criteria, I am happy to continue editing and adjusting as necessary. Thank you. Jca2014 (talk) 04:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much Jonnymoon96 (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion Suggestion

Hi, I noticed that a lot of your recent deletes requests for many ad-like articles on different companies and websites. I think we both agree that many of those are in poor shape and should be deleted. However, many of your recent requests have attracted negative attention and have been unsuccessful. May I make a friendly suggestion? When you find pages like these, could you tag them noting the issues you've found, like I did to Jirnexu? If the tags are left to sit for a while, they could make the case for deletion stronger (or encourage the article to be cleaned up to remove the issues). Here are some tempaltes I've been using:

Template:Advert

Template:Notability

Category:Notability_and_importance_templates:

Category:Cleanup_templates:

- GretLomborg (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jonnymoon96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)