Jonah22

Explanation of my hundreds of June/July edits

Note to admins wondering why I'm updating all those old links, including on archived Talk pages: I know archived pages aren't supposed to be edited. However, many of the 2000 links from Wikipedia to my bahai-library.com point to very old versions of pages (pre-2003) which have new URLs. Up till now those old pages have been left online. However, within the year I will be dismantling that dinosaur of an old site, adding redirects for any pages that have incoming links I can't update, and pushing all traffic into the post-2003 Web 2.0 site. So better that I update the links now, even on archived pages that I'm not supposed to edit, than have them all go dead in a year. Jonah Winters (talk) 20:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

---

A bot's belated welcome

Hello, Jonah22, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions and your note on my talk page. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, just type {{helpme}} and your question here on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

It might seem a lot but you'll get the hang of it and there's plenty of people out there willing to help out. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Technopat (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Greetings Jonah - when you finish editing an article page, all you have to do is click on the save page below the edit box and it gets signed automatically. When you leave messages on someone's talk page, click on the icon above the edit box and that's your signature. Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 13:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for saving the picture

Thanks for saving the picture for how the nerves innervate or effect function, but I'm not sure what to do persay, about em deleting the picture. You'd mentioned it was on your server, and please pardon my ignorance on this, but I don't actually know what to do with it to make it easily available to help other students. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you on this. I took a very break from Wiki stuff because there was a lot of RL stuff going on in my life. Kelidimari (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Kari-lynn winters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kari-lynn winters.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Process drama.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Process drama.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Know magazine 6.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Know magazine 6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of World of Stories

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article World of Stories, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Victoriagirl (talk) 21:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

World of Stories

Greetings Jonah, In answer to your query, the problem, as I see it, is that A World of Stories appears to have not met the standards of notability laid out in the guidelines. I think your best bet would be to introduce some articles written about the book. Though I couldn't find any myself, I'm betting that if they exist you know where they are. If there aren't any yet - I'm betting that there will be - the article might just be premature and could be reintroduced at a later date. I think you've been quite careful concerning publicity. That said, you may wish to read WP:COI to know what pitfalls to avoid going forward. I'm hoping all this helps. Please feel free to contact me should you have further questions. Victoriagirl (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:World of stories cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:World of stories cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Category:Canadian children's illustrators

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. You do this by listing the parents near the bottom of the page, each enclosed in double brackets like so:

[[Category:Canadian illustrators]]
[[Category:Children's book illustrators]]

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards,--Stepheng3 (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Canadian children's authors

I see that you created this category and later blanked the page. A faster way to delete a category you've created yourself is to place {{db-author}} on the page. This tag attracts the attention of an administrator who can perform the deletion for you. Best regards,--Stepheng3 (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Irfan Colloqium

You can see a couple hits from here (or use the "what links here" under the tool box on the left). I have one in development in fact in an article I have in a sandbox. I know a lot more material recently became available and I'm sure it will work it's way in over time. BTW you may be interested in the Wikipedia:Sandbox - just add /Sandbox after your user name, hit the "create page" link and fill as needed. The idea of a sandbox is for article work and development but still "offline" in the sense that editors aren't supposed to bother you unless invite though there are rules against using sandboxes for non-approved wikipedia stuff (like just personal webpages or copyright infringements...) Smkolins (talk) 23:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Irfán Colloquia

Hello Jonah22, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Irfán Colloquia, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Jeff3000. This has been done because the page is an almost identical copy of a page deleted via a deletion discussion (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Jeff3000. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Jeff3000 (talk · contribs) 14:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Irfán Colloquia

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Irfán Colloquia. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irfán Colloquia. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello!

Long time no see! How are you? Zazaban (talk) 18:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kari-Lynn Winters at Brock University.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kari-Lynn Winters at Brock University.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Patrice Baldwin publicity photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Patrice Baldwin publicity photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Onmywalk cover big.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Onmywalk cover big.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jonah22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jonah22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jonah22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Baha'i- and Winters-related articles

Hello, Jonah22. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

Baha'i- and Winters-related articles came up at Talk:Baháʼí orthography#3 apostrophes. This message on your talk page is a friendly reminder to disclose COI, if any. You appear to have disclosed your connection to the Bahá'í Library Online website correctly here: this message concerns, however, your edits to encyclopedia articles, for which you can (and should) disclose your COI following the procedures detailed at the conflict of interest guideline (click the link to see what is expected of you). Thanks. --Francis Schonken (talk) 07:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)