User talk:JoeSmack/Archive 5

"See also" links

Hi justin. I tried IceChat but got only "Host not found". Am new to IRc and must do something wrong. Anyways, you found my list of links silly in the See also section in the article Suffering, and looking at it from your point of view I found it silly too. I tried something else and would like to have your opinion if you please. Robert Daoust 00:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Wow, thats actually a really nice little template. You don't even need it in the See Also section, just put it at the end of the article. Again, great template, I'm impressed. :) JoeSmack ^Talk 00:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Template is put at the end. Robert Daoust 02:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

help

Lucky11052 (talk) 00:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)i nneed to know how to make my own new "PAGE". how do i do that? thanks..LIKE A NEW ARTICLE.

Torrent

Please see User_talk:Nominaladversary#2007_Wikipedia_Selection

--BozMo talk 15:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

See my replies to your torrent link question. DuncanHarris 22:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Social Work

I notice you have contributed to the article Social work. I have created a new WikiProject, WikiProject Social Work. I have begun to work on this project and I would love to have your help. Please take a look at it and consider joining the project. Many thanks, Ursasapien (talk) 05:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Semi

ya i will remove it!(Sparrowman980 06:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC))

No problem (Sparrowman980 06:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC))

Charles Ammi Cutter

Just popping by to let you know that the edits by User:Shangrilaista you reverted on Charles Ammi Cutter were constructive. I've restored them. — The Storm Surfer 00:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Ditto for his edit on Cutter Expansive Classification. GUllman 17:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Apologies; just about every other edit of his reverted with spam link additions. I'll try to be more careful in the future. JoeSmack ^Talk 20:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

By the way, there are also all COI link additions as the user is the librarian in charge of promoting the digital works she is adding. JoeSmack ^Talk 16:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

VRCOutreach

Hi Joe--be careful about using automated edit summaries when you're mass-reverting edits by new editors. While VRCOutreach may have had a conflict of interest, it's worth noting that that the links s/he added weren't spam or vandalism. (The NIH's Vaccine Research Center would seem to be at least relevant to the pages where the link was added, and it's a public agency.) It's important not to WP:BITE new editors by using edit summaries that imply that their good-faith edits are vandalism. Cheers, TenOfAllTrades(talk) 18:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't think i was biting, and I would consider it spam even if it wasn't a clear COI (the links were being mass added to articles with very loose association in short amounts of time). Keep in mind spam doesn't need to be commercial to be spam. JoeSmack ^Talk 01:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

I beg to differ—your heart was in the right place, and I agree that it's always suspicious when a new account starts adding lots of external links. Nevertheless, there's no indication of bad faith on the part of this new editor, so your automated edit summary indicating that you were reverting vandalism was indeed a (I presume unintentional) bite. I only ask that you take care with the automated edit summaries that you use in the future—how would you have liked being called a vandal after your very first edits to Wikipedia? TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, people do not like that don't they. Truth be told I used the vandalism rollback on WP:TWINKLE because it is a bit fast than the normal one, which requires a manual edit summary for each rollback. I'll be more careful next time, and maybe I'll hack up my monobook a bit too. Thanks. JoeSmack ^Talk 16:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 20:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi. This is VRCOutreach, and thank you both for the comments. Being a newbie to Wiki, I felt bad for inadvertently causing a COI to the links I had added. I only added the VRC link to pages that deal with vaccines, vaccine development, and the disease topics we are studying. I tried to be totally neutral in the way I described the links, thereby giving the visitor the decision on wether or not to visit our page for more information. Is that ok? It's awfully similar to the links other non-profits and causes are leaving on other pages, but please do let me know if there is a format that might work better. I'd love to be more involved in the Wiki community and we're really just trying to get information out to a wider audience. Thank you both again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VRCOutreach (talk • contribs)

Hi there! Don't feel bad, we were all new sometime. I can see that you tried to add them to topical articles, and that they we're described in such a way that was really balanced - and I thank you for considering both these things. It is still however a COI because your job (as I understand it) is to promote VRC. Let's see...think of it like this...I have a friend who is court videographer - he video tapes depositions. One time I asked him which law firm he worked under, and he gave me a weird face. He said, "oh, oh no, I work for an independent agency. You see, you can never really be quite sure how you could influence important evidence and records if you were a part of the defense or plaintiff - it is never done in-house for that reason"....You can never be sure how you might be influenced and therefor not neutral being so closely affiliated to VRC.

Anyways, if you see non-profits and causes sprinkling their links all over vaccines pages, remove them because Wikipedia is not a soapbox (WP:NOT) and those kind of links usually serve as promotion. I've seen your link, and while regional websites (we can't have every country's associated website in the EL section, it'd be hundreds long!) don't usually stick, the NIH is one of those stars that does (kind of like the NY Times of the news world). I'm sure if you use the talk page of each article asking for a neutral party to add it because you have a COI, someone would independently deem it valuable, or would discuss it with you or whatnot. It isn't as fast but it keeps everything neutral.

I hope I've been a help. We'd love if you could stay a while and be involved - perhaps by editing vaccine related articles with some of your specialized knowledge. It'd be extremely valuable. If you have any questions (related to this or not), don't hesitate to ask me here. I'd be glad to answer! :) JoeSmack ^Talk 15:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi again! Thanks very much! I totally understand what you're saying and appreciate the Wiki process lesson. I'm definitely looking forward to being more involved.  :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by VRCOutreach (talk • contribs)

Question Regarding and Edit...

Hi,

A couple of months ago, I stuck in a link to the Athenian Robotics Collective's website under The Athenian School article. The history shows that you removed it because it was 'spammy.' Being a novice editor, I was wondering what would constitute that comment. I reinserted the link, but hopefully it is not 'spammy' this time. Thanks.

Autopilot37 05:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

PS-- Question of interest, are you an alum of Athenian? You seem to have visited and edited the entry a lot.

WikBack account created

Someone, perhaps you, recently created an account at the WikBack. If the account was created by an imposter, please let me know as soon as possible so that it can be disabled. Otherwise, welcome! The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sadbook.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sadbook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Addressed. Thanks BCbot. JoeSmack ^Talk 13:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

steak Diane

Please stop fucking up my edits on steak diane. Thank you. --72.33.93.156 (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, your edits are pretty clearly vandalism. JoeSmack ^Talk 01:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Nobody likes a narc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.33.93.156 (talk) 17:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Test of automated article selection for WP:1.0

Joe,

We've been testing out a bot to select articles based on WikiProject assessments (quality and importance, with more emphasis on the latter). The lists are incomplete but the aim is simply to get the articles ranked correctly. Please can you take a look at these data and leave comments? Thanks a lot! Walkerma (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Bot activity

I was going over the list of bots and noticed that JoeBot (talk · contribs) has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots since this is a rather widely-posted message. MBisanz ^talk 06:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

De-flag. I've left comments there too. Thanks for the message! :) JoeSmack ^Talk 12:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

AIDS

AIDS has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 00:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Reply

I've replied to your request here. -- iMatthew _T.C. 20:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

mainpage redesign

Hey, took a look: glad that you enjoyed my design enough to use it as a base. Maybe if you moved all the featured content to the right col and the about wiki below explore??? Also, a thing I dislike about the current page (and many proposals) is that they have columns with content that just continues - the sections are separated but that's just MHO.--88wolfmaster (talk) 02:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Survey request

Hi, JoeSmack I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions. Thank You, BCproject (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Main Page Redesign

Hey JoeSmack, I've updated my Main Page Redesign proposal substantially, and you had some really great points last time you commented - hopefully you'll see the effects of your suggestions. It would be great if you could comment on the new proposal, I'm really proud of how it's shaping up. Many thanks -- Pretzels^Talk! 08:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Cochlear implant

Hi - just a little feedback - the operation to install a cochlear implant doesn't always destroy all residual hearing these days (certainly it used to). Depending on the person, some can sometimes be preserved (in the lower frequency region of the basilar membrane, where the electrodes don't go). That doesn't happen in the majority though, as far as I know. It's not a major point, I just saw your edit comment, thought you might be interested. All the best --mcld (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Kohlberg's GA Reassessment

Just in case you don't watch DoctorW's talk page ...

I'd really like to thank you and JoeSmack for the work you've put into addressing the concerns I raised during this review. I know that my arrival must have seemed like a bolt out of the blue, but the GA criteria changed quite significantly in 2007, particularly in regard to citations, so there's an ongoing reassessment of every GA listed before the end of August 2007, which this one was. I'm a psychology graduate myself, so the last thing I want to see is Kohlberg's article delisted. The only remaining reservation I have over closing the current review as a "keep" is the two remaining uncited paragraphs. If they were moved to talk until sourcing could be discovered, or they were admitted to be original research, then I'd be happy to close the review now.

I don't entirely agree with JoeSmack's point that it's tougher to get psychology-based articles through GA. My perception is that in general psychology-based articles are just not as well written or sourced as articles on "harder" sciences, but I don't see any obvious reason why they can't be. An article like this one, for instance, could fairly easily become a plausible GA candidate IMO; "cognitive dissonance" is a term I use not infrequently even today. :-) --Malleus Fatuorum 21:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

HIV GA Sweeps: On Hold

I have reviewed HIV for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Oil

You are very invited to join Spotlight IRC through #wikipedia-spotlight or Click here for instant access so we could collaborate on the article.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 16:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

...for taking the time to welcome me to Wikipedia and for the useful tip. Like my grandfather always says, "s'easy if you know how"! Devobaby (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out at Feedback

I feel bad when I see a request with no answer - glad you are responding to some of those requests.--SPhilbrickT 17:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

UCore / Knowlengr Help

Thanks for the helpful edits of the draft UCore entry. I made the suggested revisions. - Mark Underwood (knowlengr) 21:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowlengr (talk • contribs)

From TWST48, Thank you!

Thanks for your helpful feedback and suggestions on my Wall Street Transcript entry. I'm going to make all of the edits you recommended. Quick question: When will the "new unreviewed article" tag be taken off the top of my entry? Thanks, again. TWST48 (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Beta test of 0.7?

Joe,

Apparently I was misinformed about the license status of Okawix, it is fully GPL and open source - my mistake. Okawix is the reader software. So if you can help with a beta test, after a download from here, that would be really helpful. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 04:48, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcoming

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		For making our newest users feel welcome. May your talk page be blessed with inane, unsigned, perplexed and baffled queries forever more. Great stuff.  Chzz  ►  23:59, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Heh, one can only hope! Thanks! :) JoeSmack ^Talk 00:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

thanks for welcoming... and your message... I will try... - not to poke around [in bad manners] ;-) Csight

Hawaii Samurai

Well hi I got your message. Please respond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 06:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Hawaii Samurai

Maybe another time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 07:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Attachment theory

I've tried turning the tenets section into an ordinary section here. What do you think? Fainites ^barleyscribs 21:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

It has the added advantage of reducing the kilobytes down even further to 120,000. It was 126,000 when the FAC started.Fainites ^barleyscribs 21:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

did you really wrote all that just to welcome me? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Underlying lk (talk • contribs) 21:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

THANKS BRAH, I'll be sure to keep that in mind. Copy Pasta. Catchhelllorelei (talk) 23:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Rouge test

I just changed Rouge test to "C-class", as I noted that it was unassessed; it almost certainly meets the B-class requirements, I simply didn't have time to run through all the checks for that at this time.

I suggest, perhaps after DYK, that you get a peer review, and look at heading towards good article status.

I just poked a DYK person, so that side of things should progress soon. Good luck with it, nice work.  Chzz  ►  07:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Joe Smack

Hello it is Sally Summers here. I would just like to say thank you for your lovely message and advice. I really will take that to heart it was so kind of you making me so welcome on to wikipedia.

Thank you, Sally:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sally Summers (talk • contribs) 17:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcoming.

Great job, keep it up!--TParis00ap (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks thanks! I do try. :) JoeSmack ^Talk 20:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Cookie for your efforts.--TParis00ap (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

TParis00ap has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Lucky11052 (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC) this is cool..hi real person! are you real really? or just saying?

Hawaii Samurai

Hay are you there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 06:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

My articles

Ok I became a rookie buff on revolutions in Hawaii, I was thinking of making a list, I was surprised about how many there were here are some I created:

• Wilcox Rebellion of 1889-I heard about this one first
• 1895 Counter-Revolution in Hawaii-I was thinking of adding pictures taken during the revolution, for those civil war buffs, we got our own! (Hawaiian Civil War redirects to it.)
• Democratic Revolution of 1954 (Hawaii)-Who ever though a successful revolution could happen in the United States.
• Statehood Day Takeover (Hawaii)-this one gets points for trying.

Hawaii Samurai (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

United States Invasion of Hawaii

I see actually I got an old book with picture of old Hawaii. It was difficult finding information about the most recent coup, I live here in Hawaii, born and raised, I feel I have an obligation to know and learn the history here. Talk to you tomorrow. I am making a new article called United States Invasion of Hawaii, it was another attempt to restore the monarchy by US intervention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawaii Samurai (talk • contribs) 07:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for the greeting! I will not hesitate to ask any questions if I am uncertain about something. I sporadically edited Wikipedia as an anonymous contributor for some time, so I hope that I have at least been exposed to the basics by now. Again, thank you! =) Major Seventh (talk) 14:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure! JoeSmack ^Talk 16:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Attachment theory

Did you have much else to do? Shall I just re-nom or do you want to deal with it on talk?Fainites ^barleyscribs 20:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Well unless a major rewrite is needed I suppose it's better to do it on the FAC page for others to see as it goes along.Fainites ^barleyscribs 20:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Cheers! Fainites ^barleyscribs 20:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

EXCUSE ME JOE!

Lucky11052 (talk) 00:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC) NEED HELP! Excuse me for asking, but will someone please direct me on how I am to compose a new article for Wiki. Thanks. And I mean, a BRAND NEW article! :)

I like your welcome template.

I really like your welcome template. Is there anyway I can use the same? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Random Act of Kindness Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I confer this barnstar to JoeSmack for the best Wikipedia Welcome I could ever had!You go an extra mile to give a personalized welcome! Singtamil (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your welcome and introduction Joe. However, not every one on wikipedia is as welcoming. I got half way through writing my first entry on Astronomical Society of New South Wales, got called away so saved it noting in the comments that I was in the process of fleshing it out, and returned a few hours later to find it's been marked for deletion! Before I'd even finished writing it! So I've heard stories that wikipedia is a "closed shop" and "newbies" are jumped upon, and discouraged by some of the "old boys club". I was sceptical, but find on my first foray in wikipedia that they seem to be true. So thanks for your welcome, but the teeth-marks of your fellow-wikipedians tell me that newbies are not actually very welcome here. StarryMan (talk) 11:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcomes

Just a suggestion: before you welcome a new user, would it not be a good idea to check whether they have actually made any useful contribution? Mca kkchaitanya (talk · contribs) is the most recent one I have noticed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I actually do. Usually if the username is a name I will, or if their first contrib looks like their userspace (lots of companies put up their 'ad' in userspace, ha). This one slipped by me as I'm sure a couple of others have, but technically spammers deserve a welcome too I suppose. If anything they can ask me about COI/RS. But thanks for letting me know. JoeSmack ^Talk 16:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Another Question

I was looking at some of Wikipedia's recent changes (for the whole site, under Special:RecentChanges), and I saw that some of the changes had green positive numbers attached to them, and a few had red negative numbers. How do those get there? Are they put there by users?Tressif (talk) 21:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK for rouge test

On October 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article rouge test, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 15:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

_

Thx :)
- Anton Vodonosov (Avodonosov (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC))

Thanks

Thanks a lot for your welcome and explanations :). Actually, I have some question : in your message, you speak about "playing" in my own area. How is that possible ? Can you explain me, please ? I would be grateful... --Olrys (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot again! :)--Olrys (talk) 00:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Test

Hello, this is a test message I suppose.

Alrighty then, here's my reply AeroArrow (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

AeroArrow (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Disorg attachment

User:Fainites/Sandbox Here is the remains of an article on this subject I started putting topgether on another wiki. Maybe we can finish one day. Fainites ^barleyscribs 16:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Some more to think about on the Attachment theory talkpage.Fainites ^barleyscribs 21:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Results?

I just wanted to ping you to let you know that I replied to a question you posted on the NICE documentation talk page. --EpochFail ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to say thanks for the welcoming message and information on getting started! I really appreciate it, so thanks again :)

Epicsleewear (talk) 04:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey Joesmack

Thanks for saying hi, by the way do you now if a scarlet macaw is a generilist or a specialist? Kinda new at this, so please help. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatdaboi (talk • contribs) 17:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for the welcome message! ScottJasonYoung (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Appreciate the welcome, a pleasant unexpected surprise! Sjg1138 (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Sjg1138

Why deleted?

Thanks for the warm welcome.

Please help me understand why did you delete all my inputs? I worked so hard and I didn't even back it up somewhere, so now it's gone. I tried to include references for everything I say. I see there is quotes on here where people say for example that it is a misunderstanding that Swedenborgianism is occult. They don't include references, its just somebody's opinion, and you allow it. When I however say why it is occult, with references, it just gets rejected. It sounds rather "one sided" if you know what I mean?

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redeeminglove (talk • contribs) 19:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 

IRC

Heya,

I don't know if you've registered your IRC nick yet? If not, please do; if you have, then you need to identify. Either way, /msg nickserv help should cover it - then you can be 'auto-voiced' in the help channel. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  19:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

P.S. partly struck, I see that you are registered, just not identified; you can prob script it, depending on your IRC client.  Chzz  ►  19:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Mr. Smack :]

Just wanted to say thank you for the welcome message, that link you provided me with was great help! It answered a ton of the questions I was wondering about in regards to getting myself set up and doing the things I wanted to do. Much appreciated! Remnar (talk) 02:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you and My Recent Edit

Thanks for the welcome. Glad for the guidance.

I made my first edits on The Meisner Extension page. If and when you have time, let me know if there's anything I can improve on. Xarilloch (talk) 03:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Xarilloch

Thank you for welcome message

Had a Spamming message because of adding http://www.weddingsday.co.uk/. I added it because I found it very useful, and often refer to Wikipedia, External Links when searching for information on the internet. What is your view, and have I contravened the External links policy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pupil123 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you much

It is nice to hear from a real person. I hope i do it correctly here. Wei Lee (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC) Wei Lee

thank you

Thank you JoeSmack for welcoming me here in Wikipedia. I would certainly ask you questions in the near future since I'm still a newbie here. I hope you could recheck some of my will-be contributions if I'm writing it properly. Thanks! Writerauthor (talk) 17:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clearblueez (talk • contribs) 04:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, JoeSmack

Upon arrival, I noticed about a billion things I didn't know and need to learn and then your welcome message came along which was like bumping into a You Are Here map with some pointers on where I can get started in learning the most useful things first. Then I found you in the chat room (sorry, I don't know what it's called) and you helped me a lot more. I don't know how barnstars are awarded, but you definitely deserve them for helping new people feel welcomed and pointed in the right direction. Thanks! Ewolfe357 (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

thank you for the immediate comment

I actually did not notice the comment made by the Wiki about the "neutral point", how do I view it? Writerauthor (talk) 12:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the Welcome

thanks for the welcome Joe ! --BRFC78 (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Re:Audism talk page

From my talk page.

I admit I went overboard, bad day of being argued at by family over email explains but doesn't justify and it's a relative berserk button (it doesn't help that everyone I know with CI has no end of trouble with them, no matter how recent :p ). And yes, I'll probably bring it up, the talk page for audism is pretty bad for these cases, but a few other deafness articles I've checked are comparable. Snapdragonfly (talk) 05:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Agreed I guess, I commented on the WikiProject: Deaf talkpage, and I think it might be better to actually let the comment stand (just by policy thing); I'll retract the personal attack though I think. I don't know. For now all I have to say is at WP: Deaf... Also I'll probably have something else as an aside - the category: deaf was removed (along with the other disability categories) with a tally of vote that indicated at best no concensus, at worst, I have, as follows, for each subcat the number of votes to keep and the number of votes to delete as in the convo at [[1]] this vote:

• Deceased, gets 7 to keep, 7 to delete
• Deaf, gets 8 to keep, 5 to delete, 1 abstain - this is the clearest vote of the lot and it's keep
• HIV+, Cancer, Cancer Survivor, all get 7 to keep and 6 to delete, 1 abstain
• Synaesthetik, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Colorblind, Periodic Paralysis, Diabetes mellitus, Astigmatism, Crohn's Disease,, Asthma all get 6 to keep, 7 to delete, 1 abstain
• For Added Fun, the overall tally is that 7 delete most of it, 6 keep most of it and 1 is an abstention with a note that Deceased wikipedians is already a page elsewhere.

I'd feel perfectly entitled by this vote to recreate the deaf wikipedians category and whoever decided they had a consensus needs to relearn to count. The global tally has no consensus and Deaf, by itself, was a keep. Snapdragonfly (talk) 08:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Joe Smack! Thank you!

Thank you for the Welcome greeting! A REAL human. Not an automated Welcome! Now, since very new at this. Is there a limit to "comments" or where I place comments Wikpedia Discussion? Some are Talk by the way and some New Section. Merci'!NONDEPLUME (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the welcome, Joe! --GuyPaddock (talk) 04:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Good work

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		I recently watched you working with a new user. I wanted to note that your patience and dedication are greatly appreciated. Good work! — Ched :  ?  17:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I try! :) JoeSmack ^Talk 18:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

IMS

Am I speaking to the one who I just contacted before about IMS? New article? If so, thanks. I'll take one bite at a time. Havis1 (talk) 17:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Joesmack: I put a sandbox page of content for the proposed page "IMS". Since I got a message from you on this, I'm thinking you may have seen it. Right? How did you know? Do you have my page as "watch"? In any case, I'm going to try to get some editing into it by modeling pages that are similar in content and approach. I'm thinking that I can look at the editing on these pages, and just duplicate the parts that make sense. In any case, we are going through the tutoring - and learning a little each time. Thanks for encouragement Havis1 (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Attachment theory

What do you think now? Fainites ^barleyscribs 22:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Help Project stuff

After a long session trying once again to make head or tail of various help pages categories and general losing hair, sat back aghast at the task - but have made some progress and encountered quiddity and rd323 in some far flung corners doing their bit, so I hope we get closer to some sense of comprehensibilty. I like the simple navbox - you're on exactly the right lines, and the more complex one will fill up over time - but with the easy one as a skeleton it will make more sense itslef maybe, cheers!

Oh I must thankyou for your comments whilst editing the nav box - made me chuckle and its always good to finish the day with a laugh :) peace Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 03:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

And again, I think your genius rubbed off - might be the smoke around here but I think I might have hit on a staggering idea. With the intro pages and tutorial, it is fairly consequtive, yes? well during the tutorial or intro pages we could have a page - maybe this talk page thing we're thinking about - who's instructions are to post a message on a certain page. This certain page could be a newcomers welcome page, basically a page monitored by good selves as yourself that can welcome and offer adoption or a link to somewhere who can if you user wants it. This would give an excellent feeling to new editors and as they've bothered to get to the point we're talking about, they are good prospects, kind of warm calling. You've the right experience of this area to know the viability of this, is it a cracker? Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 03:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC) p.s.Hope I explained it clearly or you get the gist - I'll check back on my grammar etc tomorrow.

Let's see - make it part of the process of pouring through the intro/tutorials to post a test message on a talk page? Like Wikipedia:Sandbox? Or I guess Wikipedia_talk:Sandbox? We certainly can. If you were thinking more along the lines of Wikipedia:New_contributors'_help_page, unfortunately the talk page is for discussing the page itself, which also tends to be just for questions and not tests. I see what you're getting at though, and since the wiki is largely learn-by-doing, I'm all for the idea. JoeSmack ^Talk 04:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure which page yet - it would depend on the flow of the introduction and tutorial, maybe it could be placed in the wrap up section of the tutorial. I suppose I need to wait until that lot is sorted out for certain, with a nice 'holding your hand' navbox maybe - then it should become clearer where / if to place the idea... Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 23:47, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

The talk pages intro is looking nice and clean :) I hadn't realised you were getting into it - I was stuck fixing help empty pages and creating pages whilst you were there ! If we can it would be good to use any bits of your cleaned up version in the help:talk bit. Thanks still get dizzy spells looking at the help, but between us all things are looking brighter! Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 02:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, JoeSmack

thank you for the kind welcome and the tips that are very much appreciated. I did, at long last, finish my first userspace draft (after a very loooooong research of references...). What next? Can you have a look at it and give me some guidance. Many thanks in advance. --Johnkimparknew (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the welcome to Wikipedia. I've actually been lurking here for around four years now, spending alot of time reading and copyediting as necessary - I'm a proud grammar Nazi! I'll need to finally start learning how to use Wikipedia so I can do more than copyediting and small contributions, but I'm using the beta, so my experience will likely be more streamlined. Are you using the beta as well? If so, what have you to say about it? BTW, I noticed you have a psychology degree. I'm currently taking psychology in my senior year of high school, and it's quite intriguing. The reading I've done on Wikipedia over the years has given me an excellent background for the class, and consequently, I frequently surprise my teacher and classmates with my knowledge. I also am considering minoring in psychology. Spectralancer (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Spectralancer

Shooting

I almost flipped out on the removal of that content there on that page as I just double warned an I.P. for doing so with no reason. Thanks for giving a reason. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

I know, it's horrible. I actually got worked up while editing a page. Ahh! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

IMS

I have made a draft at my sandbox page; I think I received a comment from you. I wonder how you knew about this edit. Do you have a 'watch' on my page? I'm just trying to learn the editing function in this way, reading through the tutorial. I'm thinking to use the editing page of a similar article to see how they did what they did; and then duplicate. Sound sensible.? Havis1 (talk) 00:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for last comments. We continue to draft. None of the material from the article comes directly from the IMS webpage - but the topics are certainly parallel. I used the general Wiki guidelines to keep the discussion as factual as possible; using what I observed at other wiki sites that were similar. Keep up your comments. Havis1 (talk) 14:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Joe: I would appreciate your looking at the sandbox page in Havis1 on "IMS". have made some editing corrections; and coding clarifications. I would appreciate your comments.Havis1 (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Joe. I appreciated your comments on the IMS site. I have responded in the sandbox you created for me. I would appreciate a further comment, if possible, before making my next move. I wonder if it would be good to go on the chat again, and ask for some help from others. Thanks again.Havis1 (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Joe: I have edited the sandbox page for "IMS", and would like some more feedback. I have taken your comments into consideration. What you think? Is it ready for entry for real?Havis1 (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Joe

Nice to know you are a real person! Thanks for the warm welcome. I hope I didn't screw up any formatting in this post to you here. :) Michi phillips (talk) 10:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

ANI discussion

Hello, JoeSmack. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editing_by_User:Neuromancer. Thank you. Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Suggestion from your post on AN/I, see Talk:HIV#FAQ. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

uʍopǝpısdn

(Ɔ⊥∩) 600ᄅ ɹǝqɯǝʌoN 0⇂ '0⇂:⇂ᄅd˙o˙ɯ MON⋊ NƎΛƎ ⊥,NO◖ I ƎH⊥ ⊥∀HM

Requesting input for proposed community sanction of User:Neuromancer

You commented at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive editing by User:Neuromancer, a thread which has now led to proposals that the user in question be topic banned or site banned, or that review of the issue be put aside while Neuromancer seeks a mentor. Your further input to that discussion would be welcome. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Attachment theory

I was thinking of putting it back up again.Cas says he'll do his review when it's up.What do you think? Fainites ^barleyscribs 21:17, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I've stuck it up now.Fainites ^barleyscribs 08:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Another look at it

Hi Joe, have done another effort (after some initial frustrations) and would like you to have another look at the draft. Thank you very much in advance. Johnkimparknew (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Welcoming vandals

It might not be such a hot idea to welcome vandals, such as you did with Fatnoobsrule (talk · contribs) three minutes after they did this lovely first edit. They've done lots more damage since. --UncleDouggie (talk) 17:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, even vandals should get resources on how to contribute better! :) I tend to try and avoid sockpuppet names etc though. JoeSmack ^Talk 17:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Attachment theory FAC

Yay! Made it! Many, many thanks for your hard work on reviewing. Fainites ^barleyscribs 17:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Question from the retard

Hey, I was wondering if you know if military photographs are within public domain?

From you’re autistic friend who you didn’t hear from for a while - Hawaii Samurai (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Hope to hear from you soon.

Award

100px	Lorenz Award
	May the goslings of good fortune always attach to your ankles.Fainites barleyscribs 20:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

I received your massage, thank you.

A nut-case-hermit-in-the-mountains-Hawaii Samurai (talk) 07:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

If you are coming to Hawaii expect wind and ran (it is the rainy season).

Lollipop

The New Mikemoral has given you a LOLipop! This horrible pun and delicious candy promotes WikiLove and tells the world how low you will stoop for the sake of humor. Spread WikiLove by giving someone else a lollipop, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the unrelenting joy of lollipops by adding {{subst:Lollipop}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

--The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 18:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, JoeSmack! May you be blessed with a full plate and a joyous spirit!
I hope that this Christmas season is one of celebration and rest for you and your family.  fetchcomms☛ 18:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, you too!  fetchcomms☛ 19:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)