FFU

edit

This was not vandalism or a "test edit". C F A 💬 21:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tagging images

edit

Please read every field before you tag an image. File:Fall of Porcupine cover.jpg already linked to the HTML page where it was found, and the copyright info was already easily viewable. It was right there in the "other information" field, labeled as coming from the GOG.com store, and I provided a link for you to click. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please, when working on Wikipedia, follow the rules and recommendations developed by the community for correct work on Wikipedia. — Ирука13 02:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please actually read the page before tagging it. Aren't you blocked on multiple projects for disruption and sock puppetry? I think maybe you should be on your best behavior here. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please, actually read the rules and recommendations of the Project. Do you always check your neighbors' trash when they complain to the police about your loud music? I think maybe you should learn the rules for 140k edits. — Ирука13 03:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable non-free images

edit

Hi Iruka13. When you come across files like File:Austin Swift 2019.jpg which feel clearly fail WP:FREER, there are two better ways to deal with them than tagging them with {{di-disputed non-free use rationale}} template that you used. The first is {{rnfu}}: this template can be used for pretty much any image that fails FREER, but works particularly well with images that fail item 1 of WP:NFC#UUI. The other template is {{db-f7}}: this template works well with images that not only fail FREER but also WP:NFCC#2 and item 7 of WP:NFC#UUI. Both of these templates tend to be reviewed much faster that the one you used (two days and asap, respectively) and images tagged with "db-f7" might even be deleted within a few minutes of tagging depending upon whether there's an admin reviewing file tags at the time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I don't think the alternatives you suggested are better. First of all, because FREER expresses exactly what I mean - without nuances. Secondly, WP has files with license violations lying around for years, and an extra day or two won't make a difference here. — Ирука13 06:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging

edit

Hi. When you tagged this image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kraven-comparison.jpg, did you actually bother to read the page it's attached to?

Because the whole point of the Marvel Premiere Classic book line - now defunct - is that every release had two covers. It's the third paragraph, and a large part of the explanatory table.

The image clearly shows this for illustrative purpose. The article is essentially complete with the image, because there's been no new release for years. It also had a 'needs image' tag for a long time, which I've tried to address. There's no point in editors trying to complete pages if someone else comes along, pays no attention to the subject matter, and drive-by tags. It's ridiculous. There's no difference between this and any other book cover on the site. Peterspeterson (talk) 22:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

About File:Aesculapian Club badge.png

edit

Would it not be better if, instead of deleting the file due to lack of permission to relicense it as a non-free file so it could continue to be used in the article? (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have not found any infor confirming that this image can be relicensed as free.
It would. — Ирука13 19:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:SWBCfreda1a.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:SWBCfreda1a.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Handling of the "File:Ed Sheeran - Bad Habits.ogg" file

edit

The audio sample of the Ed Sheeran song "Bad Habits" has been handled by shortening it to 22 seconds. RTSthestardust (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.
Please reduce the length of the other 30-second audio fragments you uploaded to the required length, using the table in WP:SAMPLE. — Ирука13 03:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Indian Bank logo 2023.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Indian Bank logo 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:CHA23100-TheStarsAreRight!-cover.jpg

edit

Hi, you tagged File:CHA23100-TheStarsAreRight!-cover.jpg as missing clear and verifiable source information. For licensing I used the standard book cover flag when uploading the file on Upload file page and the source text that specifically states its free use rationale. Could you please tell me what specifically is missing, so it can be made clearer for you. Thanks Sciencefish (talk) 10:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just uploaded a file as a cover. This is what I got. And the uploader wouldn't let me click "upload" until I filled in the "source" field.
There is no information about where you got the file from.
Where did you get this text from the summary? — Ирука13 10:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
However, in this case, this is not a reason to install such a tag. My apologies. — Ирука13

Tagging of two images

edit

Hi Iruka! I was wondering why you tagged File:Tanner F5 Vehicle Damage.png and File:Cleanup in Limestone County after F5 tornadoes.png with "better sources requested", that's exactly where the image is from and where it was published. Thanks! :) EF5 19:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah, nevermind, I see why. EF5 20:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

YouTube

edit

Re this edit, can you point me to where it says that all videos are CC licensed? Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure. Open the video, click on the description so that it enlarges, scroll to the comments. There will be a line "license". — Ирука13 20:48, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:MagrittePipe.jpg

edit

Good catch there. I was skimming, as one does, and should have verified that the file was PD-US. Thanks! JayCubby 04:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Trophy photo

edit

I have just posted a reply because I do not understand the issue.ApricotFoot (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2024_November_29#File:The_Greyhound_Cesarewitch_Trophy.jpg. — Ирука13 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Re: File source problem with File:JFKRocketa.png

edit

Hello, Ирука13. The image I uploaded was in response to the .jpg entitled JFKRocket.JPG which was placed in the Wikipedia backlog of images with watermarks. The creator of that image is User:JRC1285 and I simply took their image, cleaned it up, removed the timestamp, and uploaded it as a .png. I would be very grateful if you would please teach me how to credit that person on the .png page (I have so much to learn...) Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 09:31, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

This image may have another problem. The rocket here acts as a statue. The freedom of panorama does not extend to statues.
Why did you decide to save this file as .png instead of writing a .jpg over the old one? — Ирука13 10:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Because I thought the .png format would be better. Should I upload it as a .jpg instead? I did not take the photo. The JFKRocket.jpg page says the uploader took the photo, and they release all copyright. So freedom of panorama wouldn't apply here, would it? Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 23:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm mistaken. I misread freedom of panorama. Should I upload this photo to Commons instead? Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 23:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
If, according to some objective parameters, the file should have been saved in a different format, then you are, of course, right. However, yesterday I saw exactly the same case, and the participant wrote the file over: this option has its own advantage - you do not need to mark the previous file for deletion.
No, the first answer is correct. Freedom of panorama does not apply to sculptures. The question is whether it is a sculpture or a "rocket on a stand". To prevent this photo from suddenly disappearing, should either ask a question on WP:MCQ or post the file on WP:FFD. — Ирука13 10:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, Ирука! I will ask at WP:MCQ and also post the file on WP:FFD, and once I know the status of the image I will either overwrite the original .jpg and submit my .png for speedy deletion, or just submit mine for that. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 20:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Re: File source problem with File:Spottaing.jpg

edit

The file was taken from https://www.nwcg.gov/publications/pms437/crown-fire/spotting-fire-behavior website as it is a US government diagram. How would I show this and prevent the file from being deleted? ( ͡° ( ͡° ( ͡° ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ͡°) ͡°) ͡°) 18:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The source of the file should be indicated on the file description page as accurately as possible. This will make it easy for other participants to verify the information provided. If the file was taken from the Internet, a link to the page where the file is located should be given. I have formatted the two pages of the file you uploaded accordingly, please take a look. — Ирука13 19:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you a lot. ( ͡° ( ͡° ( ͡° ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ͡°) ͡°) ͡°) 19:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

December 2024

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Trailblazer101 (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Star Mississippi. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Star Mississippi 02:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Star Mississippi: diff on this comment. — Ирука13 09:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
The entirety of your interactio at File_talk:Zuni_wolf_fetish_with_medicine_bundle_and_heartline,_carved_by_Stuart_Lasiyoo.jpg#Fair_use_rationale. But also your conduct for which you've been warned multiple times. This should be considered a final warning. Star Mississippi 12:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
conduct
words or actions? — Ирука13 13:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply