edit

Thanks for uploading File:1968-1969 O-Pee-Chee Bill Hicke.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:1968-1969 O-Pee-Chee Bill Hicke.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:1968-1969 O-Pee-Chee Bill Hicke.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pais (talk) 19:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:1982-83 O-Pee-Chee Mike Liut.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:1982-83 O-Pee-Chee Mike Liut.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pais (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:1977 O-Pee-Chee Dennis Eckersley.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1977 O-Pee-Chee Dennis Eckersley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1980 O-Pee-Chee

edit
 

The article 1980 O-Pee-Chee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this minor trading card set of meeting WP:GNG, doesn't seem mergeable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 02:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1983 O-Pee-Chee

edit
 

The article 1983 O-Pee-Chee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this minor trading card set of meeting WP:GNG, doesn't seem mergeable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 23:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1987 O-Pee-Chee

edit
 

The article 1987 O-Pee-Chee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this minor trading card set of meeting WP:GNG, doesn't seem mergeable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 23:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1982 O-Pee-Chee

edit
 

The article 1982 O-Pee-Chee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this minor trading card set of meeting WP:GNG, doesn't seem mergeable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 23:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1981 O-Pee-Chee

edit
 

The article 1981 O-Pee-Chee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this minor trading card set of meeting WP:GNG, doesn't seem mergeable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret account 23:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:90-91 Scott Mellanby Topps and O-Pee-Chee.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:90-91 Scott Mellanby Topps and O-Pee-Chee.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:O-Pee-Chee Sports Card Products By Year

edit

 Template:O-Pee-Chee Sports Card Products By Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply