You have been blocked indefinitely

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Karel Dvořák

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Karel Dvořák requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George8211what did I break now? 20:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Military athletes

edit

Category:Military athletes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 16:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Patrick Mächler for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Mächler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Mächler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 18:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Julio Prieto

edit
 

The article Julio Prieto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is only one page by this name - see Talk:Julio Prieto Martín#Requested move 29 August 2020 for more information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 17:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Stanisław Kądziołka for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stanisław Kądziołka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanisław Kądziołka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Giacinto De Cassan

edit
 

The article Giacinto De Cassan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. No medal record, and before search doesn't bring up much from third party sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 16:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lorentz Eide

edit
 

The article Lorentz Eide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:notable |person (same as Henry Lee Dunlap) with an 8th placing (out of 8) at the 1948 Winter Olympics. A before did not bring up anything to advance notability for an article or sports profile page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otr500 (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stanley T. Walker

edit
 

The article Stanley T. Walker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A better article than the team mates (Lorentz Eide and Henry Lee Dunlap but there is just no notability for this individual. A before did not bring up anything to advance notability for an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otr500 (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Donald Weihs

edit
 

The article Donald Weihs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:notable leader of the 1948 Winter Olympics team (along with Henry Lee Dunlap, Stanley T. Walker, and Lorentz Eide) and a before did not bring up anything to advance individual notability to warrant a Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otr500 (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Teatro Orientación group

edit
 

The article Teatro Orientación group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and WP:ORGSIG. A before did not turn up anything significant to advance notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otr500 (talk) 04:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Christof Leng for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christof Leng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christof Leng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Otr500 (talk) 00:47, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tadeusz Zaydel

edit
 

The article Tadeusz Zaydel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable skier. Performed a before search, and didn't come up with third party sources to establish notability. No medal record, doesn't seem to come close to meeting WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 18:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC) {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Maria Eulàlia Gendrau Gallifa|concern=Non-notable ski mountaineer. [[WP:BEFORE|Before search does not yield any third party sources to establish notability, and has no medal record. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSBASIC}} SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 15:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Philipp Christfeld

edit
 

The article Philipp Christfeld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Performed a before search for this painter, and Google came up with nothing, and Newspapers.com literally came up with zero results. Doesn't come close to meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 20:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chris Kroger

edit
 

The article Chris Kroger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Kroger's name appears as a one-line in some blogs/bylines that cover ski mountaineer races/results in the naughties, but there are no pieces on Kroger as a subject (definitely no SIGCOV) even in the main ski mountaineering-related media/magazines, and certainly not general media. The refs were his old sponsors, his blog and some other personal blogs. His career is now over, he never became a major ski mountaineer, so little chance of this changing. 78.18.228.191 (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Steve Romeo

edit
 

The article Steve Romeo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is little notability here. He never won a major ski mountaineering event. His references are from his own website (TetonAT), and local Jackson Hole papers. There is very little mention of him anywhere outside of his untimely death, from which most of his RS originates (I did find a one-line in the NYT while covering a Jackson Hole ski festival; i.e. he was notable locally). Zero SIGCOV in a national-RS on Steve (i.e. he was not notable on a US national level), and zero SIGCOV in the major skiing/climbing magazines (i.e. he was not notable to the international ski mountaineering community). Now that he is gone, there is little else to build on. Can't see this article lasting long-term in Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Julián Casanova (ski mountaineer) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julián Casanova (ski mountaineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julián Casanova (ski mountaineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 19:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Leonardo Proverbio for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonardo Proverbio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonardo Proverbio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Leanne Callaghan for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leanne Callaghan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leanne Callaghan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rareș Manea for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rareș Manea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rareș Manea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rareș Manea for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rareș Manea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rareș Manea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 19:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Béatrice Thomas for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Béatrice Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Béatrice Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marco Köstler for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marco Köstler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Köstler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Viviana Callahan Vargas for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viviana Callahan Vargas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viviana Callahan Vargas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Julián Casanova (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Julián Casanova (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thierry Rassat for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thierry Rassat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thierry Rassat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sigrid Tomio for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sigrid Tomio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigrid Tomio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 17:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jean-Luc Prieur for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Luc Prieur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Luc Prieur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 17:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rolv Eriksrud for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rolv Eriksrud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolv Eriksrud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aszx5000 (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Peter Svätojánsky for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Svätojánsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Svätojánsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CuteDolphin712 (talk) 11:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hepnar

edit
 

The article Hepnar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Set Index with no remaining entries

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:4585:3FB8:AF9C:D75C (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hepnar for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hepnar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hepnar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liz Read! Talk! 16:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply