Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Franjo Tahy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mediation

When there is a dispute over content for which there seems to be no end in sight, it may be time for mediation.

But mediation should be a last resort. So, if after you have tried getting a Third opinion or making a Request for comment, and the problem is still deadlocked, it may be time to check in with Dispute resolution requests. The Dispute resolution guide offers general advice.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

An invitation to join the WikiProject Croatia

edit
WikiProject Croatia
 
Project Icon
Hi, Franjo Tahy, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Croatia! WikiProject Croatia is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Croatia and the Croats. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up.

WikiProject Croatia currently covers a total of 17,867 articles and 8,395 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

I hope you decide to join and thanks for your edits :) DaßWölf 04:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Inkerpor for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inkerpor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inkerpor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 05:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mongol invasion of Hungary. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Archiving notice

edit

  Hey! During your moving of Talk:Nikola VII. Zrinski, you forgot to update the archive location. All you need to do is adjust the |archive= parameter in the {{User:MizaBot/Config}} template to the new page name. Don't worry, I've fixed this for you. Just keep this in mind if you move a page in the future. Thanks! Aidan9382 (talk) 10:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Franjo Tahy (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian-Slavonian-Dalmatian theater in Great Turkish War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Budak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilija Gregorić, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ribnik and Kingdom of Croatia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zaprešić Volunteer Fire Department for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaprešić Volunteer Fire Department, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaprešić Volunteer Fire Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why should anything be deleted?
The more information, the better.
Or is there "censorship" by arbiters or value? 104.158.27.202 (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Following of Ante Pavlović

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Following of Ante Pavlović requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ante Pavlović (chiropractor). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 12:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Following of Ante Pavlović for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Following of Ante Pavlović is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Following of Ante Pavlović until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ivan Andrija Makar moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ivan Andrija Makar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

This general is important for understanding of Great Turkish War in Croatia, as well as state of affairs in Kingdom of Slavonia afterwards. The data in the article comes from the referenced book. I will try to find more sources (although there aren't that many to begin with) in the article when I find time. Franjo Tahy (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Andrija Makar has been accepted

edit
 
Ivan Andrija Makar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Drmies (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fascism as Insult Page

edit

Hello Franjo Tahy. Am I mistranslating this source in my edit in saying that it state that Vucic and his delegation did jot provide prior notice and registration of their visit? Another user states it is not in the source. They also keep changing Jasenovac Memorial to Concentration Camp which in 2019 I don’t think it was. If you could verify it would be welcomed as I used a Google translation as I see you have edited the section prior. OyMosby (talk) 17:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

In the case then Serbian Army's delegation was banned from entering, I believe Vučić wasn't part of the delegation. There were just several cadets, but Vučić commented their ban afterwards for Serbian media and afterwards Vulin also gave his own flammable statements. The source you provided quotes Tanjug and roughly says that: "...police searched them [the cadets] and returned them to Serbia under explanation that they cannot bring their uniforms to Croatia and that they lack the documents which would justify the purpose of their stay in the country"
In case of Jasenovac Memorial changing to Concentration Camp, we could write Jasenovac Concentration Camp Memorial Site. Franjo Tahy (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I see you removed “ without prior state notice to visit” but didn’t the delegation fail to give prior notice to arriving? It wasn’t just the uniforms that were issue but also no documentation for the arrival. OyMosby (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, sorry, you are right about prior state notice. I corrected it and added another source from Dnevnik.hr where chief of Croatian police Nikola Milina confirms your point. Franjo Tahy (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Just wanted to double check if I was interpreting it right. However, for the current wording, maybe we should put “for not providing” instead of “without” otherwise it could imply Croatia failed to give Serbia state notice for barring entry. I don’t know, what do you think? It’s a bit of a confusing sentence to begin with. OyMosby (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sure I'm open for suggestions. Editor Sennalen also recently ecgaged in rfc on the article talk page. We could coordinate on how the paragraph will look like with her suggestions. She appears rather reasonable. Franjo Tahy (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cetin Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French Empire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Murder of Michalis Katsouris

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Murder of Michalis Katsouris, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of UFO sightings in Yugoslavia

edit
 

The article UFO sightings in Yugoslavia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essentially a page created by a WP:COI-contributor hoping to hype his UFO story. That is WP:NOT what Wikipedia is for and the sources are terrible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jps (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Murder of Michalis Katsouris for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Michalis Katsouris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Michalis Katsouris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jps (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Illyricvm for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Illyricvm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illyricvm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  Velella Talk   11:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Franjo Tahy. Thank you for your work on Rižinice monastery. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SunDawn: Thank you. I am glad I could contribute. Likewise, have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family. Franjo Tahy (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply