Welcome!

edit

Hello, Faster2010, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Sailor Moon (film)

edit

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.
 

The article Sailor Moon (film) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Anime Works

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anime Works requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ceradon talkcontribs 05:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Midway Games in film and television

edit

Category:Midway Games in film and television, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 02:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

More information needed about File:Kite Director's Cut.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Kite Director's Cut.jpg. However, it needs some more information before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image is from and who the author is. Please be specific, and include a link if possible.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tommy & Oscar: The Movie

edit
 

The article Tommy & Oscar: The Movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't expand sufficiently on the information given about the film in Tommy e Oscar

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mortal Kombat (2011 video game). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Winx Club, you may be blocked from editing. Sparthorse (talk) 07:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article PlayStation Portable system software, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  GSK (tc) 02:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Kite Director's Cut.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Kite Director's Cut.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Guilty Pleasures (company)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Guilty Pleasures (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO   A&E 02:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at Guilty Pleasures (company)

edit

Hi Faster2010, you recently removed a deletion tag from Guilty Pleasures (company). Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Guilty Pleasures (company). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hounddog (film)

edit

Hi. Please do not add unsourced material or original research to articles, as you did with this edit to Hounddog (filmk), as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you have any other questions, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 03:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Asphalt 6: Adrenaline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mappy and NAMCO

edit

Mappy was a NAMCO design, manufactured by Midway in the United States. What's up with your edit? - Denimadept (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of My Last Day (animated short)

edit
 

The article My Last Day (animated short) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced and no indication of WP:notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bible Black (film)

edit
 

The article Bible Black (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find any reliable sources that can verify this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

June 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. This is specifically in relation to creating articles about alleged animated films without citing any reliable sources. Singularity42 (talk) 01:18, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Toad Speak Dictionary for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toad Speak Dictionary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toad Speak Dictionary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zaldax (talk) 01:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Xanthe Huynh

edit
 

The article Xanthe Huynh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Electric Catfish 23:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shinobi Girl

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Shinobi Girl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shinobi Girl

edit
 

The article Shinobi Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any sources about this film. It looks like it fails WP:NFILM and WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 05:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hounddog 2

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Hounddog 2, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deborah Kampmeier

edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Deborah Kampmeier. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Deborah Kampmeier

edit
 

The article Deborah Kampmeier has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 07:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vegetables (manga)

edit
 

The article Vegetables (manga) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable manga. No refs. No claim to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Template:Kite

edit

You might want to visit the deletion discussion to determine the fate of the template, since between you and Farix, you seem to want to expand the template's coverage, so you should explain that at the TFD. Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_September_10#Template:Kite -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 06:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Matrix Reloaded, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ (film)

edit

Hello Faster2010,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DJ (film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, RandomLittleHelpertalk 03:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of DJ (film)

edit
 

The article DJ (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film, no sources, possible hoax. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL at the very least.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui  12:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kite (film series)

edit
 

The article Kite (film series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 18:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of DJ (film) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 02:04, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ (film)

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as DJ (film), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

save your article by moving it to the Manga wikia

edit

If you want to create any article manga or anime related at all, without any fear of it being deleted, please check out http://manga.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Dream Focus 21:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ (film)

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that DJ (film), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. + Crashdoom Talk 00:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2012

edit

  This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at DJ (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CactusWriter (talk) 01:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Best of Kitty

edit
 

The article Best of Kitty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. No independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 05:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The King of Fighters XIV

edit
 

The article The King of Fighters XIV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased video game, no sources, possible hoax. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL at the very least.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. « Ryūkotsusei » 05:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The King of Fighters XIV

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The King of Fighters XIV, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:12, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Killer Instinct (2013 film)

edit
 

The article Killer Instinct (2013 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG guidelines blatantly. Also relevant is WP:NFF.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 13:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013

edit

You made a change to an article, BloodRayne (series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and you may re-add it. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CactusWriter (talk) 22:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sloppiness

edit

You thoroughly deserve to have had The King of Fighters XIV deleted twice. You are experienced enough to know that an article totally devoid of references qualifies for speedy deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


ANI

edit

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OakRunner (talkcontribs) 07:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Romar Entertainment. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. CactusWriter (talk) 02:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of Indefinite for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  CactusWriter (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Today I again reverted several of your edits that, upon checking, were blatantly inaccurate. ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5] For the past year, your talk page has become littered with numerous warnings concerning the addition of unsourced information, inaccurate information, and the creation of hoaxes. Two recent reports were filed at ANI about your problematic editing. (1st ANI report, 2nd ANI report). You have failed to respond to any of these concerns or messages -- and yet have persisted in adding unsourced, inaccurate information to Wikipedia articles. Unless you can provide adequate explanation and assurance that you can comply with all Wikipedia policies, you will be blocked from editing. CactusWriter (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:HeavyMetal-logo.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:HeavyMetal-logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Heavy Metal vs. Dominator for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heavy Metal vs. Dominator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy Metal vs. Dominator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:MoonScoop

edit

Category:MoonScoop, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cool Dimension: Sexy Assassin listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cool Dimension: Sexy Assassin. Since you had some involvement with the Cool Dimension: Sexy Assassin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of Dance Dance Revolution lists listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Dance Dance Revolution lists. Since you had some involvement with the List of Dance Dance Revolution lists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nova Productions

edit
 

The article Nova Productions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet notability guidelines. Only one reference and an unsourced game list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Namcokid47 (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Nova Productions Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Nova Productions Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Innocent-Assassin-Poster.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Innocent-Assassin-Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wangan Midnight: The Movie

edit
 

The article Wangan Midnight: The Movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film. Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nakoruru: Ano Hito kara no Okurimono

edit
 

The article Nakoruru: Ano Hito kara no Okurimono has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing in a BEFORE. Tagged since 2011

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Funbag Animation Studios for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Funbag Animation Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funbag Animation Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 17:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply