Welcome!

Hello, Eleven Special, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Kannie | talk 21:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Nomination

edit

I don't mind at all! I'm really flattered. Thanks! Fanficgurl February 23 2008 3:17 (UTC)

Deletion reviews

edit

Hello. The template shortcuts are {{drt}} and {{drb}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

re:Eliot Spitzer

edit

Hello. Thanks for your contribution to Eliot Spitzer. Firstly a statement of minutia like that does not belong in the main article per WP:Undue. It may be permissible at Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal. However, in order to insert a statement like that, you'll need to find a source other than the Smoking gun, which contains only the partial affidavit and is therefor a primary source. See WP:Sources. The assertion may be true, but try finding it in a secondary source such as the New York Times and at least one other paper before inserting it again. Mrprada911 (talk) 22:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

As a sock of a banned user, I have no choice but to block you. Kwsn (Ni!) 14:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me? What is going on?!? Eleven Special (talk) 14:15, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleven Special (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not sure why I've been blocked. I don't even know what a "sock" is. Please explain. Eleven Special (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleven Special (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi Yamla. Thank you. I'm not a sock. Please review. Eleven Special (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

That's no reason to disbelieve a checkuser's analysis. — Sandstein (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eleven Special (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What I'm asserting is that the checkuser is wrong. I'm obviously editing from behind a corporate proxy and this is a false positive. I am not the individual who peformed the vandalism. Eleven Special (talk) 18:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Page protected to prevent further abuse, email address given to appeal CU block findings. — MBisanz talk 18:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My apologizes, but a checkuser was preformed and the results were given here. Sorry to not include that before. Kwsn (Ni!) 17:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see. Well has anyone explored the possibility that this is a false positive? You can see from my contributions that I have been anything but a disruptive or tendentious editor. Eleven Special (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well then, you can appeal it to "[email protected]" Any more {{unblock}} requests will result in full protection of this page. MBisanz talk 18:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply