August 2015

edit

  This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Jonathan Sadowski, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talkcontribs) 05:51, 7 August 2015

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MusikAnimal talk 21:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Circus

edit

Please stop adding material at The Circus (film) after being reverted by three different editors. Edit warring is prohibited—instead, editors must engage in discussion at the talk page. See Talk:The Circus (film)#Sequel. Johnuniq (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring

edit
 

Your recent editing history at The Circus (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Johnuniq (talk) 06:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

Please stop adding unsourced content to The Circus (film). If you re-add the content again without first taking part in the discussion on the talkpage, I will have to block you from editing. Also always use edit summaries for your edits. Bishonen | talk 11:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC).Reply

October 2015

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kaley Cuoco, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nymf (talk) 09:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Chris Rock. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nymf (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Johnny Galecki. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply