User talk:Clpo13/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

→

Archive 15

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 365lax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethpage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lee Tae-yong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Tae-yong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Tae-yong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 00:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerald R. Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilot Wings. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
2		Jammalamadaka (talk)						Add sources
33		Ancestral Puebloan dwellings (talk)						Add sources
9		Basnet (talk)						Add sources
7		Within My Walls (talk)						Add sources
80		Nuclear safety and security (talk)						Add sources
12		Żarnowiec Nuclear Power Plant (talk)						Add sources
16		Petrunino Horo (talk)						Cleanup
324		Markandey Katju (talk)						Cleanup
46		John Woodvine (talk)						Cleanup
79		Economics of nuclear power plants (talk)						Expand
4		Timeline of Curitiba (talk)						Expand
8		Peter Apfelbaum (talk)						Expand
4,165		Google Search (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
94		Kemetic Orthodoxy (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
31		Sinagua (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
7		Sophia Polytechnic (talk)						Merge
87		Alureon (talk)						Merge
58		Secretary (title) (talk)						Merge
48		Garance Doré (talk)						Wikify
173		STM32 (talk)						Wikify
14		MYMO Wireless (talk)						Wikify
4		Bignall Hill (talk)						Orphan
8		Tassawar Khanum (talk)						Orphan
2		Johndale Solem (talk)						Orphan
174		Mathole Motshekga (talk)						Stub
3		Fitz Hughes Predators (talk)						Stub
4		Duvva (talk)						Stub
67		Jana Pallaske (talk)						Stub
7		Inoceramidae (talk)						Stub
1		Paladugu (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Dixie

You have been blocked for 24 hours for a violation of the three revert rule on Dixie. Karl Dickman ^talk 07:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Clpo13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I admit, I got a bit overzealous with the reverting. After I realized it was unproductive, I stopped and pursued alternate channels to resolve the issue (such as WP:RPP). Considering how certain users feel about the issue, I'll avoid touching Self-arrest and Dixie as well as related talk pages. I'll take a day off, but I want you to know I understand I violated policy. clpo13_(talk) 3:39 am, Today (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Unblocked with a note that this block should not have been made. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this was a policy violation, due to the following exception to WP:3RR:

3. Reverting actions performed by banned users, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users..

Burninthruthesky (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

There's no need for you to stay away from Self-arrest or its talk pages. In fact, discussion is occurring right now at Talk:Self-arrest that will be useful for documenting consensus if another edit war flares up. I'm sorry the situation escalated to a block. Karl Dickman ^talk 16:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This block should never have been made. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

My thanks and commiserations to you, clpo13. I feel awful about the fact that we were simultaneously drawn into a situation where quick decision making was called for, and the edit warring component was overstepped. Oh, well. We're both going to have to wear a block log 'badge of shame' as a reminder not to intervene in the future. :( --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Iryna Harpy: I feel you. Poking my nose into trouble areas has always been a problem. These pages are going to need a lot of work but I'm not sure I want to get too involved, especially with an IP user who thinks it's his way or the highway. What a cluster. clpo13_(talk) 04:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

In all honesty, I don't want to involve myself any further. The only reason I got involved was due to the user's aggressive comment left on another editor's talk page. I've had enough experience to sense that there was more to it than simply breaching CIVIL and NPA. As it stands, I'm one of those gluttons for punishment who works in the most controversial areas of Wikipedia: true ARBCOM sanction territory from Eastern Europe, to the Balkans, to the Middle East. The last thing I need on my plate is more of the same. Best of luck in keeping your nose clean! Oooh, but it's so difficult to not poke one's nose in just for a peek... --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rotem sivan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rotem sivan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑ 22:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Sage Mason article

Hello, I'm not writing an autobiography about myself. I'm writing a biography about Sage Mason and the controversy surrounding his tenure at Phillips Exeter Academy. That is my only purpose for creating a wikipedia page, hence my username. Please don't delete. My article is intended to be informative but also helps generate publicity for my upcoming book.

Thanks, James Krakauer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagearikmason (talk • contribs) 23:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Mario & Sonic at the Rio Olympic Games article

Just let me know if theirs anything else you want me to fix up in regards to the reference and or citations section of the "Mario & Sonic at the Rio Olympic Games" article as I'm still fairly new to the sites mechanics. Hollowsnow95 (talk) 00:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Request for edit

Hi! Thanks you for editing my recent Arthur Elsenaar entry. Before this article, I added an entry on artist Dani Ploeger, but this has been flagged as COI and notability has been questioned. As a curator, I do know the artist, so I guess it's a fair point. If you have time, would you be willing to look at the article and consider notability etc.? In its current state the article looks rather shabby, and since I'm not supposed to edit it anymore I would actually also be fine with deletion if nobody else feels it's relevant enough to look after. DX ArtMedia (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Maddox Wing Article

Hi, i recently created the article maddox wing and it was moved to draft due to lack of information. Id like to request a move back to mainstream, thank you.

Abdul Tahan (talk) 10:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey

Hey why you put my page for a youth radio station for speedy deletion im still creating it ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benmarlow1 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

about my article reference

Hello, I want to know about my article that our group wrote and it's not have reference, how can I do for the reference? thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by S23697 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@S23697: Check out the pages about what counts as a source and original research. clpo13_(talk) 07:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cipo13: This article is my teacher's article that who no book print and not appear in website.He wrote this for more than 10 years but now he passes away. But his son want to do this for his father. how can I do in wikipedia, or if i create some website to reference it, I can answer wikipedia question? S23697 (talk) 10:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Friendly advice

Please do not advise editors that they can use WP:UNDELETE to request that pages that have been nominated for speedy deletion as you did here. This is against process and only causes more work for the adminstrators (and volunteers) to procedurally decline the request because the page is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator which does not apply in the case of the article you contacted Ememasco about (which was CSD:A7). If this bad advice continues, I will raise it as a concern to the administrators that regularly process the requests to determine if corrective action is warranted. Hasteur (talk) 14:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Action Hero. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Evaman, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Action Hero Shoot! 06:17, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes i un-reviewed it, but i didn't know that it will send an auotomatic message to you as if i am posting on your talk page with my signature--Action Hero Shoot! 06:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Action Hero: No worries. I didn't know that happened, either. clpo13_(talk) 06:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

My page Commander One

Hi! My name is Dasha. I see you checked my page Commander One. Please help me. What do I need to do to improve it and have it published?DashaG11 (talk) 09:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@DashaG11: Hi Dasha. I'd advise you to take a look at the policy pages, such as those on reliable, secondary sources. I see there are references added, so that's a good first step. The next step would be making those into inline citations, so readers can verify any claims made. Also, try to expand the article beyond a list of features, such as adding in what the media is saying about the product. Notability is a big part of Wikipedia. It's not just a list of everything that exists. clpo13_(talk) 09:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Clpo13: Thanks! I made some changes. Is it better now?

What classifies as promotional content

Please tell us what exactly classifies as promotional content. we will make the edits accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priy.31288 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Sonny Fredie Pedersen deletion

Hi Clpo13

Your account has deleted an article that was being created and wasn't finished. Is there a way to reopen the article so I can finish it?

Sonny Fredie Pedersen is a notable Danish celebrity — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaneKnowledge (talk • contribs) 20:48, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Advanced Center for Korean Studies

Our organization is non-profit research center concentrating on the thorough studies of Korean studies, we are also granted numerous historical materials by private sectors. I tried to acknowledge our organization to the academia so researchers who want to gather information concerning Korean studies could share our endeavors. Please undo your speedy deletion, I would be very much appreciated. Many thanks. Bo Seung Kang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabade (talk • contribs) 23:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

@Jabade: You'll have to talk to User:RHaworth about that. I tagged it for deletion, but RHaworth was the administrator who actually deleted it. clpo13_(talk) 02:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Removing a picture in Korea under Japanese rule

"Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Korea under Japanese rule without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. clpo13(talk) 15:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)"

Hi, Cody I would appreciate if you can help me removing a particular picture in the article "Korea under Japanese rule." I can assure you that the picture of President Park Chung Hee posing as a Japanese officer is intended to undermine his and his daughter's--who is currently presiding over Korea--reputation. Explaining the entire story will be very difficult, but I will try to provide a sketch. The reason I believe so, and am quite convinced, is that, as you can clearly see from the title of the article in question, Koreans still hold a grudge against Japanese people. As a twentysomething adult who have spent a fair part of my life in Korea, the anger towards the Japanese is hardwired into our systems. The leftist parties in Korea have often used this hatred in instigating the public in order to gain political power. The current president of Korea is Park Geun Hae, who is the daughter of Park Chung Hee, the youth in the picture (which also "happens" to have his Japanese name in the caption). It is likely that for whatever reason, whoever put the picture in the article, which I think is absolutely unnecessary, has a certain political ulterior in deciding to do so.

So here is my reason for deleting the picture. In short: I think the picture was unnecessary. If you understand my concerns, I would appreciate if you can delete the picture for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.71.20.184 (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

@180.71.20.184: I only reverted your edit because there was no explanation for removing content (such as in the edit summary). I'm not passing judgement on what should or shouldn't be on that page. If you want, you can bring this issue up on the talk page of the article for others to weigh in. clpo13_(talk) 06:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hanchos

Well hello there Clpo13 I noticed that I have violated quite a few of wikipedia's codes of conduct(as it said,they are not rules) but I know now how things operate as I have just read the tutorials. I am new here and I would like to build a strong understanding of how I can also be a Wikipedia editor/writer (as I would put it) hanchos 00:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanchos (talk • contribs)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all you do. Wikipedia4you (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Much appreciated, Wikipedia4you. clpo13_(talk) 00:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

I just g0t a message that you just removed my link

Hi,

I have shared one external link on "Gastric bypass surgery article" but got a message that the link is removed. I have gone through guidelines but not getting the exact reason behind link removal. The link I have shared : http://www.londonobesityclinic.co.uk/weight-loss-surgeries/gastric-balloon.php

So it will be great if you let me know the reason so that i can avoid those mistake in future.

Best Regards, Sanjay Agrawal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Sanjay Agrawal (talk • contribs) 05:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dr Sanjay Agrawal: I removed the link initially because it appeared promotional in nature. After reviewing the link, I believe it provides useful information, so I have restored the link. clpo13_(talk) 05:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

thanks for your prompt response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr Sanjay Agrawal (talk • contribs) 05:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hey Clpo13, thank you for helping out in the edits for C-tru, and all the supplemental wiki information you gave. -Semyfayn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semyfayn (talk • contribs) 17:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@Semyfayn: You're quite welcome. clpo13_(talk) 22:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Clpo13, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

APPROVE Kazmia Org

hi kindly approve kazmia Org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baqirkazmi (talk • contribs) 07:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Baqirkazmi: You can contest the speedy deletion tag on the talk page. Also, please look into notability, especially for organizations. clpo13_(talk) 08:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

i have contest  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baqirkazmi (talk • contribs) 08:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC) 

Howard Lederer

Will it be OK if I add "Fraudster" instead of "Thief"?

Thank you for policing the internets! :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.189.40 (talk • contribs) 14:17, September 23, 2015‎

Only if you have a few reliable sources hidden up your sleeve. clpo13_(talk) 21:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

It's a clarification. The page creator literally identified it as a Galaxy-model airsoft MP5K-PDW on initial page creation. 2602:30A:2C5E:7760:2490:B00C:7C9B:8D38 (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Fine by me. Looks like the image has an Airsoft category. A clearer description on the Commons would have been nice, but oh well. clpo13_(talk) 08:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Some edits that you made this morning

I'm sorry, but there seems to be a problem with the edits you made to Lady Day, Fiscal year and Use (law). In the first article, you added the information that after the calendar change in 1752 Old Lady Day was 6 April. In point of fact, if you check the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750, you will see that eleven days were omitted. Setting a time line:

March 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 April  1  2  3   4   5
      +0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6       +7 +8 +9 +10 +11

So Old Lady Day was 5 April.

In the second article you said that landlords and tax officials took advantage of the change to collect eleven days early. In fact that same Act of Parliament provided that the dates of collection should be retarded eleven days so that this did not happen.

In the third article, you said that in setting up a trust a property owner would transfer his property to the trustee on the basis that the trustee would transfer it to his children after his death. What is your source for that claim? Normally, someone who wanted to leave his property to someone other than the eldest son would set up a trust on the basis that he would continue to live in it until his death, when it would pass to his heirs. If the system were as you describe the trustee would move in so where would the family go? Are you expecting them to buy another house? What would be the point? 188.222.174.10 (talk) 16:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

First, I'm not convinced you're as new to this issue as you appear, and second, I did not change any information beyond reverting a WP:BLOCKed user in violation of his or her block. clpo13_(talk) 16:39, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) per WP:BLOCK When reverting edits, care should be taken not to reinstate material that may be in violation of such core policies as neutrality, verifiability, and biographies of living persons. Why did you choose to add back the incorrect information the editor had removed rather than AGF? 78.146.208.121 (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Check that verifiability policy again. The content changed at those articles was unsourced, probably WP:OR or WP:SYNTH. clpo13_(talk) 18:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I've been blocking these IPs as they post, as it's the banned Vote (X) for Change. You can reply or revert them as you wish but be aware they're not above misrepresentation and outright lying and habitually try to represent their socks as other editors. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I figured as much. Thanks for the heads up. clpo13_(talk) 18:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)There's something you're both missing. Clpo13 says The 5 April year end for personal tax and benefits reflects the old ecclesiastical calendar, with New Year falling on 25 March (Lady Day). He also says From 1753 until 1799, the tax year in Great Britain began on 5 April, which was the old style new year of 25 March. So first he says it ended on 5 April, then he says it began on 5 April. One of those statements must be wrong. 176.250.248.180 (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Maybe if there were clearer sources, this wouldn't be an issue. In any case, I said nothing of the sort. Stop putting words in my mouth. In fact, drop the subject here. Block evasion notwithstanding, that's a subject better-suited for the article talk page. clpo13_(talk) 18:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring the correct version of Use (law). Now do you agree to the restoration of the correct versions of Fiscal year and Lady Day? 176.250.248.180 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Ugly As Sin .... reliable sources bull****

Regarding Ugly As Sin: Look, we did it & if you can't identify with the links and the names on the records, accept what we are telling you to be the truth, then **** you. We don't need to proof what we did, it's been proofen and you find stuff all over the internet. I'm not fuckin wasting my time entering data and wanting to contribute to your database if you got nothing better to do than to jerk around with bureaucratic bullshit. Should you later decide you want to list information, we won't allow you unless you pay us, so be warned & just stop your bollocks now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metal Guru (talk • contribs) 03:03, September 20, 2015‎

Re: Mount Bogong page.

Thanks. I'd better do some reading before I try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teanbiskut (talk • contribs) 02:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

No worries. Feel free to ask if you need help. clpo13_(talk) 03:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

About RAT in the Browser page

Hi Clpo13,

Thank you for the note. As a first time user of wikipedia, I see that the page that I ctreated was redirected to another page, which I think should not be the case. The RitB, is a specific sort of malware, describing the group of malware likes Dyre, Dridex and others, unlike simply talking about Remote Acess Administrator, which is more general and describe what RAT is all about.

Let me know if you have any question

Thanks Karine Karineregev (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

About RAT in the Browser page

OK thanks; so how do I bring back the page? It is currently being directed

Thanks Karineregev (talk) 07:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@Karineregev: I've undone the redirect. clpo13_(talk) 08:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, thanks so much for helping on Seth Riggs page. We are still struggling to understand how to do the box on Singing For The Stars - Seth's book. AND Speech Level Singing page is deleted from earlier times, and we don't know how to start it up again. Any thoughts? Grateful for the help. DDavisDDavis — Preceding unsigned comment added by DDavisDDavis (talk • contribs) 08:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@DDavisDDavis: You're quite welcome. As far as new pages go, I'd suggest heading to Articles for Creation. Experienced editors there can assist you in building a page according to Wikipedia's guidelines. Keep in mind that you'll need a lot of unbiased news sources to establish notability for an article (see WP:42). It can be tricky, but editors at AfC or the Teahouse will gladly assist. clpo13_(talk) 08:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the advice. We will continue the work on all of that after a good night's sleep :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DDavisDDavis (talk • contribs) 08:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Might you consider suggesting a no-fault freeze of RfC H. naledi?

At the time you started the RfC of Homo naledi - it was probably unavoidable. I have made a suggestion that someone - not me - suggests something that is mentioned in this[1] link. If you suggest this, then I - or you - could contact individually the other parties involved. If I and the others say yes to "your" suggestion, then the discussion can be marked as a "no-fault freeze of the discussion - by consensus". (If I make the suggestion, so to speak, then that could possibly be used against arguments (supporting my view) in the ongoing RfC. Thank you. --Here to sway (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I would prefer to let the RfC run it's course. I'm trying to stay as uninvolved as possible. clpo13_(talk) 18:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Need Help...

Hello, I need help writing an article on a Film Critic from Canada who works with the IWK Someone on here keeps tagging it for deletion before I can even began??? Is there someone that can write it or do I do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShiloSixx (talk • contribs) 19:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

@ShiloSixx: Hi ShiloSixx, I'd recommend going through Articles for Creation. The experienced editors there can assist in putting together an article and fixing any problems before it's submitted. Generally, the problems new editors run into when writing an article is establishing notability and finding enough reliable sources. You can also ask at the Teahouse for questions on what will work for sources. clpo13_(talk) 19:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I can seem to figure this out. Is this something you could write? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShiloSixx (talk • contribs) 19:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

message

do not message me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dick and ball (talk • contribs) 21:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Keke Geladze

Good catch on the language issue. The IP's are very likely all socks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Modelling Agencies in Mumbai

Please do not delete the page as I am working on articles of the agencies that are listed. Since I am new to the system its taking some time to understand the process of writing the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.115.182.237 (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Note that each entry on the list should have its own Wikipedia article to show notability. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

In addition, the proposed deletion means you have seven days to improve the article. Also, I'd suggest starting future articles with the Article wizard, which will allow you to create articles in draft space, giving you more leeway to improve articles without them being deleted right away. clpo13_(talk) 17:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Yogi Berra 90 Percent Quote.

Please see the book and accept my change, this is the actual quote from the book: "90 percent of it is half mental."

Reference: https://books.google.com/books?id=8_kK3_17ff8C&dq=the+yogi+book&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=mental — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.29.120.214 (talk • contribs) 15:42, September 27, 2015

And page 130 shows the other quote. There are two separate quotes; one on life and the other on baseball. clpo13_(talk) 22:44, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Yogi Berra

Fwiw, the quote that the anons kept putting is the real quote.

--Kangaroopowah 22:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

It's a quote, but the full quote is "Whatever you do in life, 90 percent of it is half mental." There's another quote, "Baseball is 90 percent mental and the other half is physical." clpo13_(talk) 22:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The quote you mention is not in the book that is cited as reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.29.120.214 (talk • contribs) 15:43, September 27, 2015‎

And that's why edit summaries are important. Please use them. clpo13_(talk) 22:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Will do next time, sorry for making the change without any comments at first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.29.120.214 (talk) 22:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

No problem, it can be hard to determine what's vandalism and what's legitimate without an explanation. clpo13_(talk) 22:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Clpo13. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, MusikAnimal. clpo13_(talk) 04:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Vanio Mitev

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Vanio Mitev, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I've added a source and I believe he meets WP:PROF #6 as rector of Sofia Medical University. Thanks!--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC) .

Profanity page

Normally, I'd point out the wondrous irony of his using profanity, but I doubt he'd see the humor in it. HalfShadow 05:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't think he'd see the humor in much of anything. clpo13_(talk) 05:38, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Muhammad Tariq Qureshi Advocate

Respected Clp13, i am the assistant of Muhammad Tariq Qureshi Advocate, As u know i wrote an article of him.You recently send me a message in which u said do not edit that article.Please alow me or tell me which user created that article because i forgot from which account i originally wrote that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmadabdullahmustafai (talk • contribs) 08:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Help Me Please

Hi, i wrote an article on an Account.... username of that account was " tariqqureshi " , when i created that account i didnt give any email address because it was written optional on it. now i forgot the password... what can i do please help me!! Ahmadabdullahmustafai (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

References

2015

Hey, I just noticed this edit by an anonymous user that you accepted through pending changes review. The comment for the edit was that it was removing content because there had been a consensus reached to keep it out of the article, but the discussion on the talk page did not reach a consensus so I put the information back in the article. If you know something more about this than I do, or if I've made an error, please let me know. Thanks, Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 13:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

EranBot Project - Copyright Violation Detection

A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements.

Thanks for your great work fixing [2].--Lucas559 (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Non Constructive?

You, so I created a list of shits on my talk page, and it is fair! too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.17.61.96 (talk • contribs) 15:40, October 17, 2015‎

That's fine. But don't delete information from someone else's user page. clpo13_(talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Rosemount International School

Hi! Rosemount International School's page is going to be shut down as it lacked notability. I have already in a link from a reputable website. please take a look and let me know if it adheres to the guidelines. Thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemount_International_School

Shazrinarmk2015 (talk) 04:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)shazrinarmk2015

Indian King/Emperor pages

Hi Clpo13.
I noticed your welcome to Khaadaal (talk · contribs) after they created Thakur Sardar Singh Koli. I then noticed the similar Thakur Himmat Singh Makwana page started by Hapapapajia (talk · contribs) who I have welcomed. The sourcing /referencing 'syle' looks very similar, and somewhat similarly deficient!
I wonder if there is an educational project behind these pages? 220 of ^Borg 10:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

And another one Thakur Fateh Singh Makwana by Kolikolukola (talk · contribs). 220 of ^Borg 14:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

@220 of Borg: I was thinking the exact thing about it being a school project. I suppose it's not much of an issue if these editors are not being disruptive. clpo13_(talk) 02:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

True. But I have come across others in the past and its quite obvious it's all done in good faith, if a little over enthusiastic, uncontrolled and not quite normal WP procedure being followed! Sometime they get a little 'ruffled' when their pages get speeded, which can be a problem. There was one where it was easy to work out the connections because about two(?) dozen+ noobs were 'reviewing' and commenting on each others new creations. I think once the instructor was located and a proper project page was created etc. it all settled down.

• I did mention it for information/comment at Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 11#Indian emperors, though WP:WikiProject India may have been a better venue. 220 of ^Borg 05:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I came across another of these pages Thakur Wakhat Singh Ji, and added it to the Education board list. Then I discovered that all the creators of these pages were now blocked as socks! See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Abha Singh Makwana & Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of KingMandhata74. 220 of ^Borg 07:29, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Well that got weird and crazy. Given the fact that they don't have verifiable sources and they were created by someone with multiple accounts (for some unknown reason), I would say the articles should go. If they're about someone actually notable, they'll be recreated in time. What a strange saga. clpo13_(talk) 07:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Correction, the creators of the the pages I listed at the WP:EdNB are not, yet, blocked. The ones at the Afd are though, I meant! :-/ 220 of ^Borg 07:41, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Pages deleted. Creators blocked, now. 220 of ^Borg 08:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanking You

Thanks Buddy I was continuesly asked to remove my article of Atwal page.but u clarified my sources.U provided a clear description of my sourcestanvir9091 11:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanvir9091 (talk • contribs)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

• Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption

• Traffic report: Reality is for losers

• Featured content: This Week's Featured Content

• Gallery: Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Pakistan

• Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• In the media: Jailed Saudi blogger wins award; PR editing and Wiki-embarassment; Pakistan's third-richest person?

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deal Warrior, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Zandelle copyright

There is no copyright infringement. We the band wrote the biography and it is on our Facebook, the site that copied it would be the one doing the copyright infringement. This is the band creating their wikipedia page, it is completely backwards that this is causing a problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesCor90 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

@JamesCor90: In that case, you should read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. clpo13_(talk) 18:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

There is no conflict of interest and we are stating facts, we didn't do anything wrong, and I don't know why you are giving us a hard time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesCor90 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

@JamesCor90: Did you read the policy pages? They're there for a reason. If you're connected to the band and writing an article about them, it's a conflict of interest. With regards to the copyright issue, there's no way for Wikipedia to know if content copied from another page is freely licensed unless you prove it (copyright violations are a serious issue). So again, read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and follow the procedure to properly attribute the content. clpo13_(talk) 18:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

You seem like you have a lot of free time, please fix for me, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesCor90 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

It's your burden to fix it. If you don't, the article will be deleted. clpo13_(talk) 18:58, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Help me please... Place new article in Italian Wikipedia

Hello! I noticed you just wrote a comment about the language used in the "Sergio Neri- giornalista" article I just created, I was trying to publish it in the Italian Wikipedia but I couldn't. Could you please help me perform this change? Dan.adamez (talk) 09:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

@Dan.adamez: I don't think I can move the page, but you could simply create it again at the Italian Wikipedia. clpo13_(talk) 09:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Regarding RfC at Talk:Homo naledi

Hello. You instigated the Rfc at Talk:Homo_naledi#RfC:_a_dozen_articles_rejected_by_Nature on September 25. There has been discussion, but I am not sure if enough participants have commented to establish consensus. I am not sure how long RfCs typically last until closed, nor of the process of closing it, and as I am an involved editor do not want to do it myself. But as the article is currently locked pending resolution, any assistance you might provide as an uninterested editor and administrator would be appreciated. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Oh, I'm not an administrator, but I think, since discussion has stalled, I'll close the RfC as having gained no consensus. It seems the issue is somewhat moot now that a couple of articles have been published. clpo13_(talk) 19:09, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Yaros belkin (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC) - Greetings. What did I do wrong?

Yaros belkin (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Greetings. All I wanted is finally inform the world about some information about the company. As you see there are very few pieces of information there, all very humble (same as I am) and easily verified. Please tell me what did I do wrong.

@Yaros belkin: Well, your user name seems to indicate you have some sort of connection with this company (Yaros belkin & Belkin Marketing). If that's the case, you should read the advice at the plain and simple conflict of interest guide. If not, then my mistake. In any case it's important to keep the Belkin Marketing page neutral, but you have to be wary of adding anything that might be seen as promotional. clpo13_(talk) 05:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

@Clpo13: Yes, I do have relation to the company, but why would it mean that I would try to promote it? I am an adequate person and I do understand what Wiki is all about so my ONLY intention was to provide some general information about the company and this is it. Please read the page yourself and help me judge whether it is neutral enough. I do not plan to add anything else to it, only company logo but for some reason I can not do that. Lil help on this, by the way?

It's always a good idea to declare a conflict of interest somewhere, such as on your user page, even if you don't plan on making promotional edits. Wikipedia has had an unfortunate history of editors promoting their employers or other interests and not divulging their connections. As for uploading images, follow the Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. You'll need to provide a fair use rationale for using a copyrighted image, and the wizard will walk you through that. A small version of company logos is usually acceptable. clpo13_(talk) 05:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Acartia tonsa

Hello,

I am editing the page Acartia tonsa. I have made a reference in one section and then want to add same reference to another section. Will the full reference just appear twice (one after another) in the references section or is there another more appropriate way to handle that? Take a look at the article and you should see what i am talkin about.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Paul bourgoin (talk • contribs) 20:18, October 7, 2015

@Paul bourgoin: Hi Paul, you're looking for named references. So, the first time you make a footnote with <ref>...</ref>, you can add a name= attribute inside the <ref> tag like so: <ref name="foo">...</ref>. Then, for subsequent footnotes using that reference, you can simply use <ref name="foo" />. In the footnotes section, the full reference will only show up once but with links to both times it was used. Hope that helps. clpo13_(talk) 03:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

That answers my question thank youPaul bourgoin (talk) 09:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)§

Deletion of Ace Barrett

Hey there!

Was just curious as to why the "Ace Barrett" page has been put up for speedy deletion?

Ta! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarestus (talk • contribs) 09:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Message from Paul bourgoin

What is this about "Oh, I'm not an administrator, but I think, since discussion has stalled, I'll close the RfC as having gained no consensus..." is this regarding my post? I see it when I click on my messages. Paul bourgoin (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

@Paul bourgoin: Hi Paul, that's an unrelated message. I don't know why it would be showing up for you. clpo13_(talk) 19:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

• Op-ed: WikiConference USA 2015: built on good faith

• WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States

• Editorial: Why the news media needs a Wikipedian in residence

• News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate

• Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death

• Featured content: A fistful of dollars

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Blog: Third Wikimedia Spain conference takes place in Madrid

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Acartia tonsa photos

Your "Bio" mentions you have access to photos. I don't suppose you have any Acartia tonsa photos (different stages of life cycle). I see many on the internet but can't be sure they are o.k. to use. If I can't find any I may take my own in future or do without for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul bourgoin (talk • contribs) 03:09, October 8, 2015

@Paul bourgoin: Hi Paul, I don't think I have any photos related to that, sorry. clpo13_(talk) 19:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank youPaul bourgoin (talk) 05:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Copepod drawings

Hello,

I would like to add some drawings to my Acartia tonsa page. Many were created 1933 or earlier.

Would any of these be acceptable from a copywrite perspective?

How far back do I need to go. Example, there are drawings of this organism from 1849?

Thanks,

Paul

Hello,

Can I use any of these copepod drawings from a copywrite perspective.

How about if from 1933 or 1849.

http://copepodes.obs-banyuls.fr/en/fichesp.php?sp=13

Thanks,

Paul§Paul bourgoin (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Under American copyright law, everything published in the US before 1923 is in the public domain and can be freely used on Wikipedia. For images published later things become much more complicated. We'd need to know whether it was published with a copyright notice, and whether that was renewed within the first 28 years after publication. See commons:Commons:Copyright rules by territory#United States for details on US copyright law. If the images were first published in another country, that country's copyright law may also be relevant. In France, for example, copyright generally expires 70 years after the death of the author. That is, works of authors who died in 1944 or earlier generally are in the public domain in France. For images published in 1849 that's virtually guaranteed. Huon (talk) 18:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks allPaul bourgoin (talk) 05:24, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Acartia tonsa article

Hello if you get a chance can you please provide any edits / recommendations to this article?

Thanks

Paul bourgoin (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

@Paul bourgoin: Am article link would help, and this template is meant for your own talk page. It appears you're asking for the help of Clpo13. --  Kethrus |talk to me  12:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

@Paul bourgoin: Hi Paul, the article looks good. Great work. clpo13_(talk) 15:13, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

One quick question

How do you like the "G Frsh" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.108.38 (talk) 22:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

At a glance, I think it looks good. It has a neutral tone and looks like it's supported by numerous, independent sources. clpo13_(talk) 22:30, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Legend of Ben Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Hall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Reliable references

Would you consider SCOTLAND YARD or the government of Canada reliable or trustworthy references?

Are you prepared to be haunted by this historical revelation? Tandynfan (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Sure, those are trustworthy groups, but you'd have to be more specific with the references. For instance, you could cite a book or website published by one of those organizations, but referencing the organization itself doesn't help with verifying the claims made. See WP:CITE for more information. clpo13_(talk) 04:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

If you could give the right shoulder a tap...

...we could really use an SP over here. HalfShadow 08:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks and Help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Trevor Willoughby (talk • contribs) 10:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome to Wikipedia, hopefully I can help out around the place some. There is certainly plenty of articles which I can think of which would suit both my expertise and interests.

I have had a little issue though; I had a page removed which was listed as violating section A7. I believe the issue was actually a case of the whole article not being read through before this decision was made. I have re- submitted the article 'Allworth Homes', with suitable alterations to address this situation. Can someone please advise me if everything is okay with this now, and if not, what is required to be altered to allow this page. Mark Trevor Willoughby (talk) 10:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Azel Backus

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Pleas tell me, What it's mean?

Hi Clop 13

I wrote article named in Russian <<Локальные объщие объекты(Local shared objects)>> today. I saw that there is not article about the "local shared objects" in Russian. So I decided to write the article about Local shared objects in Russian.

After your editing, I saw these messages in my page about my article. "

• From an alternative language: This is a redirect from a page name in Russian to a page name in English. These words may directly translate or they may be related words, names or phrases.
  • This redirect leads to its target in accordance with the naming conventions for titles in other languages and can help writing and searches.

"

Is it means that my article can be linked in page <local shared objects> in English, after click "русский"(in Russian) at left side? I wanted to my article in Russian can be seen like as in other languages about the <local shared objects>.

I am really waiting for an answer. Thank you for reading.

You added your article to the English Wikipedia but it wasn't in English. If you meant to write the article in Russian, you should sign up and write it at the Russian Wikipedia. Hope that helps. clpo13_(talk) 16:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It really helped))

Peter Szewczyk, film director

Added more credible citations. Linked Naomi Scott's wiki page, where there was mention of Peter Szewczyk, to this page. Colourbleed (talk) 17:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit mistake

I recently received a message saying an edit of mine to the page titled "John Hodgman" was undone, but I never made any edits to this page, either logged in or not. Since I was not logged in when I received this, I believe this is an error in ip logging. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.143.95 (talk) 00:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Jeh

But I want to know what Jeh says is right or wrong! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.68.47.106 (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Contrary to what you might believe, editors aren't required to prove anything to anyone regarding information posted on their user pages, especially to users who are harassing them. clpo13_(talk) 06:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Steve Mendez

You probably should check the history next time-the guy kept on removing the tag for Steve Mendez, anyway at least it got its tag back! Wgolf (talk) 22:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Well, how about that. Usually I check, but I figured this one was brand new. clpo13_(talk) 22:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gastrohepatic ligament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gastric arteries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Problematic Jurrien J.B. Le article

I noticed you've had some serious reservations about the Jurrien J.B. Le article. You seem to be more familiar with the specific Wikipedia rules for dealing with such articles, so I'm leaving the comment here. Basically, I did a broad search and found nothing, zero, supporting this article. The user has now added a whole bunch of citations, but *none* of them mention *anything* about a person with this name (or for that matter a similar name). For example, the first citation (currently #1 in ref. list) is simply a link to the Taiwan Relations Act and the last (currently #10 in ref. list) simply an article about a specific type of operation. This is the pattern throughout. The more I've checked the more hoaxy it looks, incl. a bunch of "cover-up" citations that at first may appear genuine, but when actually checking they mention nothing about this supposed person. Regards, 62.107.193.198 (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Arthur Nock

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

A discussion on the use of the term God to explain Vedic terms

Dear Clpo13,

My apologies if my edit did not appear constructive. This is an issue that needs to be debated and resolved by Hindus and people learned in Sanskrit and the Vedas. I am a Hindu, but not a Sanskrit scholar. However the term "God" does not appear in any Vedic scriptures or Hindu Mantras and the term Deva is mistakenly translated to God or god. This happened in circa 1930's when the Rig Veda was translated into English. The term Agni Deva was translated into Fire God. This is incorrect. Consequently Hinduism has been described as a polytheist religion and that to is improper. There is no equivalent term for Deva in English. Just as Karma, Avatar, Mantra have been incorporated into the English language, I believe the term Deva/Devi needs to be adopted as well.

I understand I am treading on deeply ingrained religious and political issues. But it has to be addressed.

Yes what I am suggesting has profound impact in many explanations of Vedic concepts. This is by no means trivial.

Please tell me how and where I can discuss this among my Hindu brothers and sisters and Sanskrit scholars.

Regards,

Rajan Shastri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsshastri (talk • contribs) 00:04, October 24, 2015

@Rsshastri: I reverted your edits because they weren't accompanied by a reliable source. Wikipedia disallows original research, thus content must be accompanied by a source to allow for verification of any claims made. I'm not sure where you can discuss this in more depth. You might try one of the reference desks. clpo13_(talk) 07:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

JonTron

So wait, Game Grumps can have a wikipedia, but JonTron can't? Can I please have an argument to why this page SHOULD be deleted, besides "All of these arguments were used in the previous deletion."? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.78.238.132 (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Look, I don't care either way if there's any article. I'm just pointing that it's been deleted, by discussion, three times. Everything anyone has to say about it (he has X number of subscribers! X has an article, why not JonTron?, etc.) has been said before. clpo13_(talk) 19:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Kristen Alderson

Uhm Kristen Alderson is no longer dating Chad Duell, she moved back to Philadelphia, ABC SID confirmed it. She even confirmed it. P.J. (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC) P.J. (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll quote myself from Livelikemusic's talk page: The source you provided ([3]) doesn't say anything explicit about her relationship status. WP:SYNTH forbids drawing conclusions that the sources don't explicitly state. Her tweet may very well mean they aren't in a relationship, but we don't know that for sure. WP:BLP is very clear about contentious information about living people. Until there's a clearer source, the information shouldn't be added to the article. You can bring the issue up on the article talk page if you want, but I'd recommend waiting for more sources before adding anything new to the article itself. clpo13_(talk) 19:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

D'Ancona

Thanks for pointing this out Clpo13. I realised I misspelled the name of the person in the pagetitle and tried to correct, not being aware that move was the way to go. So sorry. I added a request to the first created page to be deleted, should I remove that? Many thanks Pips15 (talk) 20:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

@Pips15: No problem. It's a common issue. I'll tag the properly titled page for deletion so the original can be moved. That way, the page history can be preserved. An administrator will be along shortly to fix it. Cheers. clpo13_(talk) 21:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

I am sorry, I will write in English from now on. I was saying that what I edited is correct and I do not know why the user Philip J Fry keeps undoing my edits with the false ones. The information I put can be easily checked by opening any program table from Telemundo. Nevertheless, I will also add some references that further prove what I am saying. Please do not permit user like Philip J Fry to vandalize good work.--Zzz369 (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

• Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching

• News and notes: Wikimedia lawsuit against NSA dismissed; Affiliates mailing list launched

• In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"

• Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus

• Featured content: A more balanced week

• Op-ed: Wikipedia is significantly amplifying the impact of Open Access publications

• Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing

• Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2015 Newsletter September drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 25 editors who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. October blitz: The one-week October blitz, targeting requests, has just concluded. Of the nine editors who signed up, seven copyedited at least one request; check your talk page for your barnstar! The month-long November drive, focusing on our oldest backlog articles (June, July, and August 2014) and the October requests, is just around the corner. Hope to see you there! Thanks again for your support; together, we can improve the encyclopedia! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, KieranTribe, Miniapolis and Pax85. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Recent Edits On Peter Martin page

Hi, I received a message that said something about being in an "edit war". I didn't know I was in one. (lol) I'm new to Wikipedia and I thought there was a glitch because when I referred to the subject of the page as Peter Martin, it changed to just Martin. I thought there was some computer reason why he lost his first name. I wasn't even sure if some things on this site was computer generated or programmed editing. I'm sorry if there's a problem. It would be nice to know why the edit preference is to drop the first name. It's uncommon in editing for publications. Surfnburn15 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfnburn15 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

@Surfnburn15: There's actually another editor removing the first name. According to Wikipedia style guidelines (see MOS:LASTNAME), subsequent uses of a person's name omit the first name. I don't know why that's the policy, but I'm sure you could ask at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies for clarification. Hope that helps. clpo13_(talk) 17:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Seven Five, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internal Affairs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

• From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help

• News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles

• In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA

• Op-ed: It’s time to stop the bullying

• Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement

• Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth

• Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages

• Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Community letter: Five million articles

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I have not reported you. I merely reported another user you had interaction with, mainly at Talk:Kristen Alderson, and thought you should be notified that you were merely mentioned, out of respect! livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 23:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I am not Edit Warring

I am not edit warring. In fact, I am the only one who followed the proper procedure. I presented a large amount of citations. Consistantly used the Talk page, and merely protected the consensus made long ago. If there is ever an example of Wikipedia choosing popular opinion over its own procedure of fact checking and rules, it would be here. Please see that I am not dishonest, and review the edit history and Talk page. Thank you. Pahlavan Qahremani (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@Pahlavan Qahremani: The policy on edit warring is clear: An editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring regardless of whether their edits were justifiable. You've been reverted by three separate editors. I see this issue has been discussed on the article talk page before, and, to me, consensus appears to be against inclusion of Azerbaijani people. If you disagree, you could start a request for comment to bring in new opinions, but you absolutely shouldn't start an edit war. clpo13_(talk) 17:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Then LouisAragon was as well charged with an Edit Warring warning?

What about the proper use of the Talk page?

A consensus was made. Citations given. Facts show Azeris as Iranian, but opinion against.

They failed to present citations for their point.

I showed mine in ever single portion of proof there can be.

What right is there in the rules of Wikipedia to allow this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pahlavan Qahremani (talk • contribs) 17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

If there was a consensus, it's not clear considering how many people object to the inclusion of Azeris. That's why I suggested a RfC. Furthermore, no other editor has reverted more than once. You've reverted three times, which means you're bordering on violating WP:3RR. Start an RfC on the talk page before reverting any further. clpo13_(talk) 17:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Which is why I am accusing a favoritism for popular opinion over facts. There are many who feel all Eastern Iranian peoples should be removed, yet they remain. Rightly so. As should Azeris, as evident of proper procedure, and my correct use of the Talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pahlavan Qahremani (talk • contribs) 17:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bull tv series uk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bull tv series uk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4960444. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 23:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Bull tv series uk listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bull tv series uk. Since you had some involvement with the Bull tv series uk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 00:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk page

I am new in wikipedia. I have made some mistakes. There was some unnecessary conversation in the talk page. So I have removed them. And they are of no such importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arman ad60 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

@Arman ad60: No worries. There are guidelines governing talk pages and the comments on them. It's better to archive old comments to make it easier for future editors to find and read them. clpo13_(talk) 02:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

New Companies delsort category

Hi Clpo13: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 16 October 2015 for companies, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Nice, thanks for the heads-up. clpo13_(talk) 17:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

What happen to you?

It takes hard effort to contribute here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shibamanot (talk • contribs) 09:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your intervention re: 107.10.236.42. This aggressive IP, also edit under 63.116.31.198 , or, at least, the two IPs repeat one another's edits. they have been harrassing me. Do you know the link to a process where I can ask to have them blocked?E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

List of Friends characters

I reverted your revert on the List of Friends characters page. You reverted it back before the cite errors fix in the references section. 76.254.21.73 (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

New Disability delsort category

Hi: Just a heads up that a new deletion sorting page was created on 19 October 2015 for Disability-related articles, located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability. Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting on Wikipedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

• Op-ed: You are invited to participate in the Community Wishlist Survey

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone

• In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?

• Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad

• Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket

• Gallery: Princess of Asturias Awards 2015 ceremony

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

• Op-ed: As one thousand of us requested, Superprotect has been removed

• Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee

• Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review

• Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling

• In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys

• Traffic report: Doodles of popularity

• Gallery: Paris

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion sorting

Hello Clpo13: Thanks for your work in performing deletion sorting. Just a note that when adding the Schools delsort to AfD discussions using User:Fox Wilson/delsort or User:APerson/delsort, the entry has to be manually added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools (the script does not add it to this one, for whatever reasons). I have added two of your recent Schools delsort postings to the page, for Belton Middle School/Freshman Center and Yeokum Middle School. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Streamlined

Looking at that list, there's only a couple I'd call genuine streamliners, & that Poncho certainly isn't one of them... If we're going on C_d, the Typ 2 belongs on it; its was lower than the Typ 1's... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 00:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

• Special report: ArbCom election—candidates’ opinions analysed

• In the media: Icelandic milestone; apolitical editing

• Discussion report: BASC disbanded; other developments in the discussion world

• Arbitration report: Ban Appeals Subcommittee goes up in smoke; 21 candidates running

• Featured content: Fantasia on a Theme by Jimbo Wales

• Traffic report: Darkness and light

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

The article does not infringe the copyright !

The article does not infringe the copyright ! Belarusian_bloggers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.45.44.207 (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

I realize now that the page I believe it was copied from was actually a copy of an existing Wikipedia page. However, the content of the article is copied from other Wikipedia pages and is essentially a duplicate of Category:Belarusian bloggers. I don't believe it needs to be its own page. clpo13_(talk) 16:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyvio on San Diego incident

Please be aware that the source from which this page was copied (http://jurassicpark.wikia.com/wiki/San_Diego_Incident) is available for use under a license that is compatible with Wikipedia use, and so does not constitute a copyright violation. Of course, Wikia's purpose is far different from Wikipedia's, so the content is not appropriate, but its is not a copyright violation. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't quite sure if Wikia was 100% compatibly licensed. clpo13_(talk) 18:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Not all of it is, but many individual Wikis are. If the Wikia page displays the CCbySA license, then it can be used at Wikipedia. There's even a template ({{Wikia content}} to generate the requisite attribution. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Yasutaro Koide passed away?

Is this edit a joke or did Yasutaro Koide really pass away? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_supercentenarians_who_died_in_2015&diff=691623001&oldid=691622927 Deaths in 2013 (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2015

I have no idea. It's apparently sourced, but I can't verify if that's a reliable source (and I can't find any other sources to corroborate the claim). A couple of other editors have disputed it as well. clpo13_(talk) 18:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Leah Hicks page deletion

Hello Clpo13, a page I just created was deleted and I just wanted to see if there was any way it could stay up for just 8-10 hours? It's my best friends birthday today and her birthday card reads "Wikipedia says you don't exist. But now it says you shot Abraham Lincoln. You're welcome" and I literally just want it to be up long enough for her to get her birthday card and check Wikipedia for herself. Is there any way we can make this possible? Hisydri (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Hisydri 11/21/15

That's really not what Wikipedia is for, sorry. clpo13_(talk) 23:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crouton (computing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

• Op-ed: Wikidata: the new Rosetta Stone

• News and notes: Fundraising update; FDC recommendations

• In the media: Erasmus Prize awarded to Wikipedia; trouble on the Russian Wikipedia

• Recent research: Do Wikipedia citations mirror scholarly impact?; co-star networks in silent films

• Featured content: Caves and stuff

• Traffic report: J'en ai ras le bol

• Arbitration report: Third Palestine-Israel case closes; Voting begins

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Blog: Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland urge Reiss Engelhorn Museum to reconsider suit over public domain works of art

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:27, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Kuomintang in Burma

Hello and thank you for helping to format my references! Pleasantly surprised to see the edits after I woke up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZGantz (talk • contribs) 01:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

@ZGantz: You're quite welcome. clpo13_(talk) 15:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

HELLO! You wrote me a note, and I wanted to write back, but am not sure where to do it. Kayrenee (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC) I don't understand how to sign my post. I am kayrenee.

RFCs

Hello, thank you for your comments. :)

You commented in relation to European bio names. This was an issue which surfaced in July 2011 and continued for several months. It has long been resolved. FWIW There have already been several RFCs on the subject of European bio and place names, with the same overwhelming result each time, and hard-written into the MOS guidelines across multiple languages, so the issue is not a new RFC but getting editors to follow the results of previous RFCs and MOS. :) All the best, cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

• Op-ed: Whither Wikidata?

• News and notes: Online harassment consultation; High voter turnout at ArbCom elections

• In the media: Is Wikidata as transparent as it seems?; Wikimedia Fund-raising drive launches

• Traffic report: Jonesing for episodes

• Featured content: This Week's Featured Content

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Closure of Complykaro AfD

Hello Clpo13, the discussion on this specific nomination was far from uncontroversial - especially as none of the "Keep" voters bothered to provide a single new reference for their allegations (an extensive online search on my part did not come up with any independent in-depth sources). If you are allowed to self-revert this closure (not sure about the process), would you please do so to let an administrator look over the case? If not, could you advise if a WP:DRV would be the next step to check the situation? I appreciate that you are trying to trim down the backlog a bit, but I believe the decision in this particular case here was too hasty. The better solution for all involved would have been a userfication as suggested in the nomination's last 2 posts. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@GermanJoe: I've undone my closure to allow for an admin to take a look. clpo13_(talk) 17:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response. Trimming that increasing AfD backlog is really helpful in general, but in that specific case an admin could probably userfy the article more easily - if such a compromise is the consensus. GermanJoe (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Closure of Cassidey AFD

Please undo your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassidey expeditiously. This was a controversial discussion, not suitable for an NAC, and your close shows no attempt to determine whether several delete !votes, challenged as guideline-noncompliant, should be given significant weight (a task better left to admins generally). The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Maybe you should poke an admin to look at the backlog. clpo13_(talk) 17:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Dan Garodnick

I had a post taken down about Dan leading the 2015 PCVST purchase by Blackstone/Ivanhoe. Here are my sources:

http://www.garodnick.com/press-release/agreement-between-city-new-york-and-blackstone-group-term-sheet

http://www.garodnick.com/news/2015-10-22/blackstone-leads-deal-buy-stuyvesant-town-housing-complex

http://stuytownreport.blogspot.com/2015/10/garodnicks-view.html (this also shows how the residents feel)

http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/10/29/how-stuy-town-was-won/

http://www.costar.com/News/Article/Blackstone-Ivanho%C3%A9-Cambridge-Reach-$53-Billion-Deal-for-Stuyvesant-Town-Prompting-Some-to-See-Similarities-to-2006/176514

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20151020/BLOGS03/151029998/blackstone-group-leads-5-3b-purchase-of-stuy-town

http://www.gothamgazette.com/index.php/opinion/5947-the-future-of-stuyvesant-town-a-peter-cooper-village-garodnick

208.133.34.214 (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You can add this information into the article with proper citations. I removed it originally because it was unsourced. clpo13_(talk) 19:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Albasco.com

I already salted it after I deleted it. Thanks for closing the AfD.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

So I saw right after I saved. clpo13_(talk) 21:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

• News and notes: ArbCom election results announced

• Op-ed: Wikidata: Knowledge from different points of view

• In the media: Political editing in the context of the US presidential primaries

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 winners

• Traffic report: So do you laugh, or does it cry?

• Featured content: Sports, ships, arts... and some other things

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Closure of Kathleen Snavely AFD

I will say the same as I said here: why did you choose to close this as a redirect? The consensus did NOT appear to lean towards redirecting, the same article was nominated for deletion only a month ago (an kept), so you should at least consider both discussions. The consensus over the two discussions was leaning towards keeping. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ollie231213: If you disagree with my interpretation of consensus, feel free to open a review at WP:DRV. clpo13_(talk) 06:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Another one is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helmut Hoffer von Ankershoffen which I feel would be simpler simply reopening and relisted as one week is hardly enough to allow more comments without relisting and it would save everyone a 2nd nomination. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. I relisted it. clpo13_(talk) 19:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Thanks for reminding me, Clpo13. I don't know why IP users keep doing this. I did not do anything wrong! I hope this stops someday. But, once again, thanks for reminding me that I have not been blocked. DBrown SPS (talk) 02:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Jamie McCourt

Hi. I received your talk message in regards to the constant back and forth editing for Jamie McCourt's page. We are trying to update the page with the proper title of Co-Owner that she is entitled to use but it keeps getting reverted even though many footnotes have been provided. I need to know what acceptable documentation or references have to provided in order to keep the proper title in place. Thank you Pete731 (talk) 18:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kathleen Snavely

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kathleen Snavely. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ollie231213 (talk) 22:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

THEN DON'T YOU EDIT MINE BACK IN YOUR PROCESS!!! 174.23.172.2 (talk) 07:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)