Bluedogtn

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bluedogtn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes, I understand that I am in violation of sock puppet policies, I created the three subsequent accounts in order to avoid trouble for myself in real life because Bluedogtn is known by some of my personal acquaintances to be something I affiliate with, and I got harassed so I created the other accounts. I was using my other two accounts the SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? and The Gypsy Vagabond Man at my employers job site on their network and they traced it back to me, and told me they were monitoring my edits. So, I assumed the identity that I have held for the past 2.5 years, and have not used another account other than HotHat. If I have to go back to use Bluedogtn then it could do irreparable harm to myself. I will not damage this project with a duality of persona's (e.g. accounts) to get any perceived upper hand in anyway. I just wanted to be honest about who I was that's all. I follow other editors advice, when they critique my work, so that I am not accused of promoting any article for an artist, album, or song that I create namely (Walter Gorlitz and 3family6). If I am given the privilege of being able to comeback and edit here then I will request to use HotHat and cease from ever logging into my old accounts that I did to prove my older self to the community. I really do love Wikipedia that's why I am coming out to let the community know that I do not want to hide anymore. If an administrator or administrators want to delve into this with me, then I will answers any and all questions in order to obtain my editing privilege. I will continue to show civility and assume good faith to every editor on here with the lone exception just recently to The Rambling Man. I cannot say how sorry that I am for my incivility with respect at DYK to him and on my talk page, and their is not one excuse for it, none at all. I will continue to make notable articles for this encyclopedia, which the last two-and-a-half years of editing has shown and spelled out with respect to music in general and more specifically to Christian music that I love. Also, I will nominate any articles that are not notable for deletion, so that I help Wikipedia harness its true potential and become all that it can truly be.BLUE_DOG^TN 17:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I do not understand how being known to your employer can cause you problems, unless your edits are in some way objectionable (which I do not see). But in any case this does not explain why you need at least three sockpuppet accounts. And are you also Walter Gorlitz? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MfD nomination of User:Bluedogtn/Sandbox B

User:Bluedogtn/Sandbox B, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bluedogtn/Sandbox B and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bluedogtn/Sandbox B during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)