August 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to All Saints Anglican School, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Barliner  talk  12:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Casual convo

A tag has been placed on Casual convo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Flyguy649 talk contribs 06:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Casual convo, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 07:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to All Saints Anglican School, you will be blocked from editing. Flyguy649 talk contribs 07:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Sorry I've had to block your account. Maybe MSN or Yahoo Messenger would be better than Wikipedia if you want to talk to your friends? -- Samir 08:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ben chang93 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was the one who started the All Saints Anglican School page and stuff and I have helped edit a couple of pages from my IP address, you can even check if you want to

Decline reason:

There appear to have been two people participating in the conversation on the All Saints Anglican School page. Please check Special:Contributions/Ben chang93 to see the edits made from this account. Because of that, there is cause to believe this is a compromised account and it cannot be unblocked. I have removed autoblock from your account so you should be able to log out and make a new account, but because there is no way to know if this account is currently controlled by the person who originally created it, it cannot be unblocked. — B (talk) 05:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ben chang93 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i know the people who were using my account back then. It was at school and they were next to each other when editing that page. He later made an account, but I forgot what the username was. I think he was blocked for paying out a guy called Nic Lenan or someone from our school

Decline reason:

This account is blocked for vandalism. Your request does not explain why that block is in error. — Sandstein (talk) 12:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.