Anothervorld
Welcome to Wikipedia!
editHello, Anothervorld, and welcome to Wikipedia!
An edit that you recently made to Etyen Mahçupyan seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.
Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio's
editStop uploading copyrighted images that you do not have permission to use. If continued you may be blocked for editing without further notices. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
edit
Your addition to Etyen Mahçupyan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Etyen_Mahcupyan.jpg - FlightTime (open channel) 04:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Public Policy and Democracy Studies
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Public Policy and Democracy Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Simplexity22 (talk) 23:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at Etyen Mahçupyan. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:34, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
ANI notice
edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
edit Your recent editing history at Etyen Mahçupyan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN talk to me 19:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Anothervorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am so new at wikipage. All I was trying to do is to place an image on the page I was working on and even the image-that I own-got rejected. That is really confusing.I wont be uploading any images since apparently wikipedia does not accept any of them..can you please unblock me so that I can at least work on the text and finish my project..thank youAnothervorld (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not convince me you have read and understood WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FU. And I took a look through your edits. Wow. No. "He has a special interest in horse racing because he predicts the future and learns If he made it within minutes." "He is a highly respected intellectual who is capable of truly understanding the 'then' and 'now' Turkish politics within the region." Wikipedia's definitely better off without those sorts of contributions. Your account should have been blocked even without the copyright issues. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Help me!
edit | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with
Hi there, I have been trying to reach one of admins that blocked me. I tried to leave messages to their talk pages with no success. I am new at wikipedia and I constantly violated copyright issues and as a result I have been blocked. Since then, I clearly read all instructions. Now I have more knowledge about how to work on a wikipage. I am just wondering If my block is going to be lifted sometime? I will really appreciate If I m given another chance so that I can finish my project at wikipedia. I will also appreciate whether you guys can tell me If my account will never be unblocked. At least I would know and forget about this project. Thank you for understanding..
Anothervorld (talk) 08:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- You can make another unblock request by following the instructions above. Your block is "indefinite", which means that it has no specific date at which you'll be automatically unblocked, and your account will remain blocked until successfully appealed. If you read our guide to appealing blocks, it will give you a lot of help in learning what we look for. If you can't convince an administrator to unblock you now, you can to wait six months and ask for the "standard offer". That, too, can be declined, but it's at least a possible way forward. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Anothervorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia admins, I have been blocked because I constantly violeted copy right material as I was trying to upload pictures to the profile I was working on. In fact, I was trying to figure out which photo will be accepted since some of them absolutely doesnt say it is copyrighted. Thus the reason why I was insisting is not to purposefully violate it but foolishly find the one that wont produce copy right issues. However after I was blocked, I read in detail and understood how to figure it out. My mistake was to be lazy and not to read the clear instructions but rather jump into try-and-fail circle. I have a small project I am working on and it is very important for me to finish that project. I need you to give me another chance and please unblock me so that I can finish my project. I even contacted important people to be able to receive a full copyrighted original photo and I have that now with me. If I am unblocked, I will happily and very carefully edit wikipedia and will be very responsible.Thank you !
Decline reason:
Only one unblock request at a time, please. See below. Huon (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Comment: Outside of the copyvio issue, you still have not addressed the concerns of the quality of your edits brought up by Yamla or your use of a sock account here and on Commons. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Anothervorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As for the concerns Yamla mentioned, my explanation is simple: "He has a special interest in horse racing because he predicts the future and learns If he made it within minutes.". Yamla has a problem with this statement. However this is not my opinion about the person I edit. This was his literal words taken from an interview in turkish and I just translated it. In his interview he was arguing and making connections between political predictions vs horse racing predictions. If one had read the entire interview, he would have understood the point. I still dont see what is wrong with that statement and what is wrong to state it in wikipedia especially If it is the person's literal words taken from an interview. as for the other other point : "He is a highly respected intellectual who is capable of truly understanding the 'then' and 'now' Turkish politics within the region.Again, this is not my opinion either. there is another very famous turkish journalist whose name is ali bayramoglu. he has an entire column dedicated to the person whose profile I was editing.I just wrote down what other journalist thought of him. I still dont see and understand why this is not in line with wikipedia. I read wikipedia terms, I dont think these statements have any problems. I would really appreciate If someone can make a better explanation than yamla did.As for the socket.I even didnt know what a socket mean until I read your comment. I did not create another account. I have no knowledge about that. Thats not me. I hope this time one admin can unblock me.If this doesnt work, I jut will give up. It is ok..have a good day..!
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but if even in retrospect you cannot see how the lines Yamla pointed out are blatantly promotional, I don't think Wikipedia would be improved by unblocking you. Huon (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Anothervorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
dear huon,First of all thank you for being nice.since yamla really broke my heart with his/her harsh words.he/she could have said that in a slightly nicer way.but I understand now that his/her point was right. I read https://chr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not. I was thinking as long as they are not my personal opinions, they should still be fine.otherwise trying to promote someone in my opinion works against to its purpose. If I am unblocked, I will be super neutral and give only information (neutral info), and I wont even attempt to upload any photo unless its my original. Come on ! I have a PhD ..I believe I can really do something good here..i ve always supported free source of knowledge that also includes Wikipedia..I learned my lesson..promise.can u plz be nice even if you decide to keep me blocked,please..i m a very sensitive person..have a good day
Decline reason:
{{subst:There is no clear reason or advantage to the encyclopedia in unblocking you. You have made it clear that you have a single purpose and cannot edit in a neutral fashion. Any further unblock requests will result in your ability to edit your talk page being revoked. If you truly believe you can edit the encyclopedia in accordance with our policies and guidelines, I suggest you take a couple week to study them and start fresh with a new account, avoiding any subjects you have a conflict of interest with. }} -- John Reaves 15:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm not inclined to unblock here, and in any case am not the blocking admin. But I'll freely grant that some of the problem could have come from language issues, too. Please, if you are the reviewing admin, consider reviewing this on the basis of the block, which was for copyright issues, and consider my point about the wording to be satisfied by a combination of language issues and the above unblock request whether Anothervorld addresses the neutrality issues. --Yamla (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Yamla for your niceness..and I understand and accept the final decision of the admins.. I will study first wikipedia rules ..