March 2013

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alameda15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry I do not know about sockpuppery if you can reduce the block to 4 weeks that is fine. Alameda15 (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Rschen7754 00:56, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alameda15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes i do understand what i was blocked for. I will make useful Contributions instead what my history looks like before i was blocked Alameda15 (talk) 01:08, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Imagine that you are at school, and your teacher gives you a test. Imagine that, instead of answering the questions on the test, you simply write, at the top of the test, 'I promise that I know all the answers on this test. Please give me an A.' Your teacher will give you an F, because you haven't written anything that helps her evaluate your knowledge. You haven't written anything here that helps me evaluate what kinds of edits you would be likely to make in the future, so there's nothing I can use to evaluate your request for a reduction in your block length. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alameda15 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do understand what I was block for. I did not know about having two or more accounts were not allowed. I will make edits that are not disruptive or not put false block messages or use two or more accounts. Alameda15 (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It is apparent that you were trying to evade your block with your unblock request on User talk:108.240.219.88. Elockid (Talk) 23:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alameda15 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I do understand what I was blocked for. I will make useful edits if I do get unblocked. I also want to change my user name. Alameda15 (talk) 23:36, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's not terribly convincing, and there's no need to change your name at the moment. Kuru (talk) 00:15, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have removed talk page access. Please quit wasting our time. --Rschen7754 02:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit