November 2015

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sanal Edamaruku. Thank you. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sanal Edamaruku, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2015

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  -- GB fan 13:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You have no rights on Wikipedia

edit

You seem to have made an erroneous conclusion. From the article on the United States Constitution, "The First Amendment (1791) prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and right to petition." It protects you from the government interfering with your freedoms. Many editors mistakenly believe that they have the right to free speech everywhere but this is not the case. Wikipedia is a privately owned website and as such you have no rights, merely privileges and due to your threat of legal action these privileges have been revoked by an administrator. You may consider reading WP:FREESPEECH and WP:LEGAL. Also, the fact that Wikimedia Foundation is funded through donations has absolutely no bearing on its ownership status and how it chooses to conduct its activities. Blackmane (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply