199.203.195.69

February 2024

Look, this is an encyclopaedia, not your blog. I'm sure your unsourced anecdote about an episode of a sitcom is fascinating and everything, but such trivia does not belong in a serious article. Stop adding it. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 14:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry I saw that every time I change it, the system is undoing it. I was not aware there is a real person behind this system. Hello there!

I disagree with you about seinfeld. It is no less classic than the literature mentioned there. It is my intent to find out who is "above" you in wikipedia and appeal on your judgement. About the sourcing I can add the source.

Wikipedia is not my blog, but it is also not your scientific journal. You might have started this article, but it doesn't belong to you now, and the public will continue it according to the rules.

All the best. 199.203.195.69 (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia's rules on this are here. You are free to dispute this rule, which has existed for 18 years, by asking at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trivia sections. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 15:08, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.81.187.192.168 (talk) 15:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

---