188.77.39.132

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Atanes (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas Atanes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 188.77.39.132! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:54, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Atanes has been accepted

Nicolas Atanes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 21:23, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicolás Atanes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicolás Atanes, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes (2nd nomination). (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — MarkH₂₁^talk 04:00, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Page history of Nicolás Atanes/Draft:Nicolás Atanes and so on

@MarkH21, SafariScribe, David Eppstein, RoySmith, Girth Summit, Explicit, Qcne, Materialscientist, and Scottywong: Hi 188.77.39.132.

Hi IP user. In this context, please see

• Remitbuber
• CommanderInDubio

amongst any number of other concerns

Please also see;

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes (2nd nomination)

Please do let me know if I can assist you in any way this, or anything else related to the English language Wikipedia.

Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:19, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@Shirt58 I accepted it via AfC after the IP editor came into IRC Live Chat for some help with it, feeling it just about squeaked past the notability threshold and there was a 50% chance it would survive an AfD. qcne (talk) 13:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Article was deleted with no reason. I understand what the article past was, I came here to contribute on a topic was of interest. I looked after help, I asked for it, and article was written following notability guidelines. What makes me have so much interest is that I was said how to do it right, in an attempt to find a way to contribute here, unfortunately I wrote on a notable topic, I contested the deletion, and, with no reason, article got eliminated. Is there any reason for the article to be eliminated? If no, can the article be recovered? Because it seems that there are taboo topics? 188.77.39.132 (talk) 15:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@MarkH21, SafariScribe, David Eppstein, RoySmith, Girth Summit, Explicit, Qcne, Materialscientist, Scottywong, Qcne, and Izno: Hi all, and apologies for the multiple pings - while not intended to annoy you, it may well have that effect. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Remitbuber/Archive#16 December 2024. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:40, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Shirt58, I'm not annoyed at all, just a bit perplexed - am I being pinged because I've taken some prior action in the SPI case and you just want to notify me, or is there some action you want me to take here. By the way, Scottywong has retired, and hasn't been active for over a year - probably best take them off your ping list. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Remitbuber per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Remitbuber. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 19:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

188.77.39.132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi Izno, also MarkH21, I do not understand all this rigmarole. I am very confused on the reasons that are leading to blocks, deletions and accusations, I understand the article may have a disruptive and repeated historic and it may be true that for editors it should be boring to prevent situations like this. But, please, objectivity goes first. I would like to understand how to work on here better, but when I see that a relevant article, that follows every guideline, gets deleted, my first question is: how to create an article, if following all the guidelines and being notable is not still enough for Wikipedia admins? I just want to ask you if you are going to keep the article deleted or you are going to check notability and restore it if it becomes evident is notable? :Ah, I do not understand why got blocked for no real reason. I will paste the undelete request made, so you can make history of the reasons: :Article was deleted despite being notable and relevant based on reliable sources. It cannot be said that reliable and independent sources were used that prove that the subject is notable and the information provided is verifiable. I read the deletion log—I think this is the name—and it says: "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G4, G5. User: Remitbuber." For instance, G4 does not apply. G4 says "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion." I do not know how was the past article to know if I should do it different. What I researched is that it was deleted in 2022 and many sources come from 2023 or 2024. And G5 neither, is about "Creations by banned or blocked users, or in violation of general sanctions", and I don't understand why that applies to myself? I understand what may be the past of this article, but it is objectively (as far as I asked and got answer) deserving a Wikipedia entry. I request the article to be undeleted and consider all the underlying problems later. I said it in the Talk page of the article as a contest to the speedy deletion. 188.77.39.132 (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This appeal does not address the reason for your block, it's all about an article that got deleted. This IP is blocked to prevent it being used to evade blocks that have been placed on various accounts. Any unblock request needs to address that issue directly. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---