183.90.36.169

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Buakaw Banchamek has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Buakaw Banchamek was changed by 183.90.36.169 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854389 on 2015-12-16T09:55:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —RainFall 08:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal, you may be blocked from editing. —RainFall 08:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

GirthSummit _(blether) 08:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Edzard Ernst. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

At Alternative Medicine and Edzard Ernst, you reinstated your own preferred version after being reverted, without gaining consensus on the talk page. Please read WP:BRD, and take note of the discretionary sanctions notice above. Thanks. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have created a section at here - if you would like to discuss the changes you want to make, please do so there. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 08:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:183.90.36.169 reported by User:Girth Summit (Result: ). Thank you. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amala Paul. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 14:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---