March 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Invictus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Invictus was changed by 109.145.136.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859833 on 2016-03-23T17:44:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Silencer (firearms) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Silencer (firearms). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Silencer (firearms). Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Silencers

edit

The article is called Silencer (firearms). It therefore must use that term in the first sentence in the lead to explain what the title of the article is talking about - even if that is the incorrect term. If, having consulted WP:COMMONNAME, you believe it's the wrong term, you can start a discussion on the talk page and get consensus to change the article title. But as it stands, the word silencer must be used. Now please stop edit warring over this - I'm about to drop a template on your page explaining what that is. GirthSummit (blether) 17:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

And it's definitely not spelled surpressor.Sjö (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Silencer (firearms) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GirthSummit (blether) 17:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:109.145.136.108 reported by User:Girth Summit (Result: ). Thank you. GirthSummit (blether) 17:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Silencer (firearms). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 20:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Silencer (firearms), you may be blocked from editing. GirthSummit (blether) 20:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Silencer (firearms); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 20:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:109.145.136.108 reported by User:Kirbanzo (Result: ). Thank you. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 20:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply