February 2024

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to Ormond College appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, 101.184.28.99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Uncited additions / misuse of sources

edit

Hi, I noticed, as at Joanna Masel for instance, that you have been adding claims to articles without providing a suitable source to verify them, or (equivalently) by making it look as though the existing source supports your claim when it does not. This is highly damaging to the encyclopedia, as it depends completely on its sources for its reliability, i.e. you are hurting the trustworthiness of Wikipedia, obviously a serious matter. Please ensure that you provide a reliable source for every claim you add to articles. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply