ßlaïsi Furstqurzel
Nomination of Sanders-Trump dream ticket for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanders-Trump dream ticket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanders-Trump dream ticket until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cahk (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Welcome
edit
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
editHello! ßlaïsi Furstqurzel,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 19:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
|
- I prefer chai latte over actual tea. Sorry. --ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 19:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ‑ iridescent 20:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked without warning, and I have not been notified about what 'personal attacks' I have made. Please enlighten me. ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So you have no idea? The harassment was here. Good block. Bishonen | talk 20:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
That edit was an innocent mistake, I was preparing to use that word (which is scientific, not racist) in a article and I got confused and used it on some editors home page. ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sure you meant to use "bloody awful" in an article as well? Obvious troll is obvious. Talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.