This user has been on Wikipedia for 16 years, 2 months and 9 days.
This user has made over 10,000 edits to Wikipedia.
On Wikipedia
I'm a WikiGnome hailing from Newcastle upon Tyne, England. I don't tend to write articles, do DYKs, produce FAs and GAs, but I do my best to fix up article formatting, spelling, grammar, and do general copyediting. I have rollback to aid me in my fight against vandalism - it was granted to me by Luna Santin on my second day due to exceptional circumstances, and my demonstrated want to use Huggle. I also perform non-admin closures at AFD, and my list of closed discussions can be found here. I am also a member of the CVU, armed with Huggle, Twinkle, Lupin's anti-vandal tool, and a dab of common sense.
I am a regular at #wikipedia on freenode under the same username as here. I often enjoy talking about music, politics, ethics, laws, copyright, and being a cat with Ceiling_Cat and the gang.
My view on adminship is that if a user is demonstrably not a vandal, knows what they are doing, at least in general, and you trust them or have no reason not to trust them, you should support them by default. Contrary to popular belief, we do not have too many admins, there is not an imposed limit on how many there will or should be, and in the majority of cases more administrators equals less disruption. Recent times have seen dwindling numbers of RfA applicants, and we as a community should welcome people who request adminship with open arms. When reviewing whether to support or oppose !vote on an RfA, remember that all you are really asking is whether you trust them with three buttons. Three simple buttons. It is obvious that administrators open to recall is dying a death, and has been since its inception. But we do not need a new system - in cases where administrators have abused their powers, their sysop rights have often been removed. All you are really asking yourself at an RfA is - do I trust this person to be both a spokesperson for the community en masse, and also, do I trust them to perform normal administrator 'duties' like blocking? If the answer is yes, then go on and support - what is the worst that could happen?
I also maintain a mistakes page. I can imagine that some editors may question the usefulness of such a page, but I guess it is an attempt to quickly show the community that whilst I try my best, I am still human, and I still make mistakes. These mistakes should be reported - if I have made a mistake, report it on my talk page, and I will get on rectifying it and adding it to the mistakes page. For obvious reasons, don't add entries to the mistakes page yourself.
Neurolysis has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Neurolysis's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Neurolysis!
Neurolysis has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Neurolysis's day!
For your fantastic image deletion work,
enjoy being the Star of the day, Neurolysis!
If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox.
Neurolysis/Page has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as Neurolysis/Page's Day! For being an all-around excellent user who has helped me around, enjoy being the star of the day, dear Neurolysis/Page!
This award is presented to Neurolysis, for his incredible work on {{Wikipedia ads|ad=193}}. You efforts are so very appreciated. Thank you.Ikip (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Have a Pie!
You are hereby awarded ONE PIE for using SO-DIMM in a rhyme! Viva Geek-Rap! :) ArakunemTalk 18:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
In recognition of the fact that you actually deserve more than one Barnstar for your recent work, Ched in his typically lazy manner drops off your "Dual-Boot" Barnstar for:
Your efforts to work with cluelees editors, and help them achieve their goals. For this, you are offered the the Friendship Barnstar
Your efforts to continually make Wikipedaia a better place, I offer you the Tireless Contributor barnstar
The Excellent Userpage Award
Your userpage is excellently made and deserves to have an award for it. The NewMikemoral♪♫ 23:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For making copy-edit changes to X&Y. Your work is truly appreciated. Keep up the good work around Wikipedia. :) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 18:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for defending my talkpage from the 4chan morons, it hasnt gone unnoticed. The reason I dont want my talk page protected is because of moral principals. Looks like they got bored.....for now. Thanks again ! «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 10:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
The Help Desk Barnstar
I, Iamawesome800 award you this barnstar for helping me get my signature. Iamawesome800 03:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I Herby award you the random acts of kindness barnster, for being a good buddy and helping me! Accdude92 (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
In tribute to your successful efforts in strengthening the content and character of Wikipedia. Keep up the great work! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:04, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
it seem as though user:neuro has lcoated the image in question! Thank you for wo your work! You deserve a barnstar Smith Jones (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for being the impetus that brought me back to Wikipedia. Your patience and clear-headed help made participation possible again. Kallimina (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for spotting my code error and sorting it for me. It was very nice of you and it was definitely appreciated! Nja247 06:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
