Seeing people willing to copy edit all my badly written prose makes me happy inside. Thank you all!

ImTheIP (talk) 19:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC) I'm never going to cleanup this page.

For some damn reason, the more real life stuff you have to do, the more interesting Wikipedia becomes to edit...


https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/ <- Super great site!!!!!!!!! WP:REX <- Also great!

I'm a tenured professor with 40 years of experience in international law, international relations, international human rights law, history, literature, philosophy and gender studies. Thou shalt not revert my edits!! Update to those who take things literally I may or may not be a tenured professor. You are allowed and encouraged to revert all my edits that are garbage.

Three

edit

Four

edit
Five
edit
Six!
edit

I like to:

  • Delete paragraphs and template tags.
  • Organize sections.
  • Replace contrived sentences with simple ones.
  • Add paragraph breaks.
  • Write about what I know.

I don't like to:

  • Wrestle with markup.
  • Lose changes when Firefox crashes.
  • Be accused of having an agenda.
  • Discuss too much.
  • Follow dumb rules.

In MY opinion

edit
  • Articles should be as short as possible, but not shorter.
  • Only one subject per paragraph.
  • Short sentences are better than long. Periods are better than commas.
  • Children should be able to understand Wikipedia.
  • Non-native English speakers should be able to understand Wikipedia.

Funny trolls

edit

I reserve the right to chuckle.

"Newman also got a nice intellectual backhand on live tv by a Canadian psychologist which made her eyes visibly wet and left her red colored lips shaking with hysteria."

Resources that are useful

edit

Old stuff I'm not working on

edit

Some of it, I am.

DONE

edit
edit

New article shelf

edit

Haaretz articles I need

edit