Wikipedia

User:FisherQueen/Archive29

< User:FisherQueen

FisherQueen
User Page · Talk page · Archives · Sandbox · Patrol · Templates

Speedy deletion of :User:FisherQueen/Secret

edit
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User:FisherQueen/Secret|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rtphokie (talk) 23:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit war

edit

IP adress 74.248.71.213 is currently edit warring on quite a few articles, breaks the 3 revert rule, has been warned twice about this, but blanked his userpage and continues. Warrington (talk) 10:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

edit

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Apology Please

edit

I would like an apology for slamming me with a sockpuppet name that I have no clue who he/she is nor have I heard of.Cena Jr (talk) 08:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Or you could let it go and get on with life. People make mistakes all the time...FQ isn't perfect. ;) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 08:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
You created your account about two hours after that user was blocked. Your user name is very similar to that user's, and you are editing in the same subject areas. Given that information, the assumption that you are the same person is a reasonable one. If you really aren't, that will become more apparent as you create a contribution history that is useful, and distinguishable from the blocked user's. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Which still proves nothing. I told you, I do not know who that person is. I've only became interested in the WWE Alumni page only after someone decided to go and change it from the original format. If you have no more concrete proof that someone's a sockpuppet, then you really need to apologize rather than stir the pot up.Cena Jr (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Replay Photos page

edit

Hi FisherQueen, On Feb. 20, you deleted a page I was creating on a company from Durham, NC called Replay Photos. At first, I didn't understand what had happened to the article, so I tried to recreate it without providing the appropriate documentation to back it up. I've assembled several articles that prove the notability of this company (especially among well established individuals like Coach K at Duke University). Please take a look at them and let me know if you'll be able to undelete the article so I can keep adding to it. Thanks!

http://www.news.wisc.edu/15767

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/26/virginiatechshooting/main2731339.shtml?source=RSSattr=VirginiaTechTragedy_2731339

http://ecupirates.cstv.com/genrel/090607aaa.html

http://www.hokiesports.com/cc/recaps/1152004aaa.html

http://www.coachk.com/coachk-photos.php

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-151895535.html

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-152645647.html

http://www.goduke.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=4200&ATCLID=3642874

http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/replayphotoscom-offers-unique-gift-to-university-alumni-college-sports-fans-17981.php

http://www.killerstartups.com/Site-Reviews/replayphotos-com-athletic-college-photos

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/11/prweb481961.htm

http://dukecei.com/?p=54

http://www.news.wisc.edu/11946

http://www.thezoi.com/node/10355

Corleonebastich (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wonderful editing!

edit

I have seen some of your pages and they are very organized. Keep up the good work! (Iloveapplemacintosh (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC))This message was mistakenly put on your user page so I copied it here. LovesMacs (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

After all.

edit

I bet you type without using your little finger, right?

edit
Yes we are true enemies, by your making alone. You who destructively only care of style and psychotically are utterly blind to substance. It is you who is the quintessential enemy of sane communication.

Bout time you had one of these

edit
The Surreal Barnstar
How do, FQ? It's been a while, but now (thanks be to the Goddess) the broadband is flowing into my Mac I may be around a bit more. Tonywalton Talk 23:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Love note

edit

Fuck you bitch I will find your IP adress n kill you with my gun bitch ass motherfucker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.2.190 (talk • contribs)

You know, my mom is pretty hot. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Replies, in order: O_O and LOL. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 21:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I really like the unblock request: I only received a second level warning and planned to stop. Why I am blocked. The block was so unfair. Sigh. De nasty game troo me off before I run out of lives! Waaah! Tonywalton Talk 21:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, be reasonable. Without four warnings, how was he expected to know that the above message was not okay? You can tell from his unresolved anger toward his mother that she didn't teach him good manners. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I wonder if he's succeeded in step one (find my IP address) yet? He won't be able to kill me with his bitch gun until he locates me. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The standards of threats are declining. The person who inspired Tonywalton to create Sackful of swallows (talk · contribs) had a knack for the thing. Acroterion (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I still remember those threats. Now that was a vandal who understood the insane poetry of vandalism. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Vituperation ain't what it was (and the policemen are getting younger, and I remember when it were all fields round here). FQ, the creator of the love note could try 127.0.0.1 as an IP, and see where the bullets go then (apologies for being a sad techy). Tonywalton Talk 23:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hee! I understood that joke! I also get about 3/4 of xkcd. Viva la nerd humor! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23
11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Botched block review of Histopher Critchens and Wikipedius Reparo

edit
Please see this comment:

Again, I am not Wikipedius Reparo. Wikipedius Reparo is not me. The claim that my "contribs are suspicious" is absurd -- back this up with one single example, rather than tossing around unsupported allegations. Please unblock Wikipedius Reparo's account. I can understand honest mistakes, but this is becoming ridiculous -- I'll file a complaint against the offending admins unless you all clean this up quickly. Histopher Critchens (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Histopher Critchens (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppets

edit

User try to bias article, removing relevant and sourced facts, most probably also using sock puppet. No respect for guidlines. This user is editing the Komondor dog article under one name, User:Meoconne [1] Probably also edits the article Komondor as User:Lynovella and IP adress 70.121.204.57. Provides third oppinion on Komondor issues and edit war, on talk page under name, User:Lynovella which he or she presents as Thid Person Arbritation, misspelled. (Lynovella also claiming that average height has never been removed). Combined IP adress :70.121.204.57 and red link User:Meoconne repeatedly reverted edits at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ and Komondor dog breed, non-NPOV edits. Remove edits from the Komondor article such as : No upper height limit is given.[1] and other relevant and sourced edits such as the dog breeds average height (most possible influenced by personal bias).

Both average height (sourced) has been removed, (several times), [2] [3] [4], [5] [6] [7] upper limit height (sourced) [8], [9] mentioning other similar Hugarian sheepdogs [10], which all of them are extremely relevant information for this encyclopaedia article on this dog breed, and when we (and even ClueBot) [11] [12] [13] [14] put them back he keeps removing them [15], and produce a lot of unhelpful edits isntead [16], removing reference title [17], [18] without any consensus.

This qualifies as Wikipedia:Edit war, disruptive editing, [19], [20]copright violation, from the FCI Komondor Standards [21], poorly formulated edits added in upper case, bias, non-NPOV edits Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and [22] most probably sockpuppetry by same editor, the above mentioned newly created new red link user accounts all editing the same articles, Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ Komondor and Alpha Omega Epsilon.

They are all concentrated on the same issue at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ and Komondor dog breed, trying to adjust the article in a certain way. Namely that the breed is smaller than it acctually is and it is more like a certain dog the accounts and IP might be related to, or like, thoug they deny this. It is also possible that the account User:Goldie102 has been created to support this issue around this dog, see edit [23].

A dog which the accounts calls Ouincy, and which figures in a picture here (a smaller dog with a longer body), ignoring breed standard, and other sources and pictures presented in argumentation.

This breed beeing fairly unknown, not many people check that article, or try to defend it from bias .

I would like report them as sockpuppets but it looks like only administrators can do that. Warrington (talk) 23:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Try WP:SSP, Warrington. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 02:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


Thanks, I did.

Warrington (talk) 07:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

edit

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Question about a deleted page

edit

Hi FisherQueen,

Let me first say that I'm not upset with you, I just want to know what I need to do to get a page I created back online. I am the web site administrator for the Stop TB Partnership and I had at one point created a wikipedia page for them but apparently it was deleted for copyright violation. Could you please let me know what I need to do to indicate that I am an authorized representative of the copyright holder so that the content will be allowed on wikipedia. Thank you very much! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jobarr (talk • contribs) 15:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Question about a deleted page

edit

Hi FisherQueen,

Let me first say that I'm not upset with you, I just want to know what I need to do to get a page I created back online. I am the web site administrator for the Stop TB Partnership and I had at one point created a wikipedia page for them but apparently it was deleted for copyright violation. Could you please let me know what I need to do to indicate that I am an authorized representative of the copyright holder so that the content will be allowed on wikipedia. Thank you very much!

JoBarr (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC).

Because you're the web site administrator, you have a conflict of interest that makes it inappropriate for you to create an article about it. Don't worry; if it is a notable subject, it's inevitable that someone outside the group will write about it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Ahhhh, I see. Ok, Thanks for the explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.232.3.98 (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

undeletion

edit

Hello my name is Duncan Edwards one of the pages that i have created has been deleted numerous times. it has been marked as vandalism and such of the sort. It is not. The article is on Coffeeism it is a starting religion. The religion started almost a year ago but I have just started making it public. The Coffeeist religion has a website at www.coffeeism.webs.com, I started putting the information about the religion on Wikipedia about a month ago but it keeps being deleted for no reason. i would like you or one of the other administrators to make my article safe from deletion. you have deleted my article and i would appreciate it if you would put the article back thank you, Coffeeism (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Duncan Edwards

My question above

edit

I did not get any help anywhere. But I strongly suspect these are socks, can you check them, please?

Warrington (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


Just let me add a clarification. The Komondor article is edited wery seldomly indeed, and I still think that it is strange that suddenly four newly created accounts which do not edit anything else but Komondor related topics, all of the sudden appear one after the other, and start working in the same direction, supporting each other in all ways. Because of one picture taken at Westminster Dog Show and used at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ article.

And all of them are referring to a certain Komondor dog called Quincy, (which is said to be the one in that picture). All accounts try to adjust the Komondor dog article to make it sound like the breed is smaller and with a longer body, which means, to look more like the dog in that picture.

A dog the accounts and IP might be related to (thoug they deny this), or like this dog, which the accounts all call Ouincy, a smaller Komondor dog with a longer body than the international standards calls for.


User(s) repeatedly removed relevant and sourced facts.

Combined IP adress :70.121.204.57 and red link User:Meoconne assisted by User:Lynovella, repeatedly reverted edits at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ and Komondor dog breed articles, and removed facts from the Komondor article, such as: the dog breeds average height (30 inch), the fact that no upper height limit is given.[2] leaving only minimum height (and even other relevant and sourced breed caracteristics too). Both average height (sourced) has been removed, (several times), [24] [25] [26], [27] [28] [29] upper limit height (sourced) [30], [31] mentioning other similar Hugarian sheepdogs [32], which all of them are relevant information for this encyclopaedia article on this dog breed, and when I (and even ClueBot) [33] [34] [35] [36] put them back he keeps removing them again [37], and makes quite a few unhelpful edits instead [38], removing reference title, [39] without any consensus.

This is both Wikipedia:Edit war, and disruptive editing [40], [41].

This edit was also copright violation, an exact copy from the FCI Komondor Standards [42], poorly formulated edit added upper case The above mentioned newly created new red link user accounts are all editing the same articles, Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ Komondor and nothing else.

They are all concentrated on the same issue at Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ and Komondor dog breed, trying to adjust the article to show that Quincy is a perfect dog according to the breeds standards.


This user(s) was editing the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show‎ and the Komondor dog article as an IP adress, IP adress 70.121.204.57, than under one username, User:Meoconne [43] He or she probably also edits the Komondor article and talk page as User:Lynovella and continues in the same time as IP adress 70.121.204.57. It is also possible that the account User:Goldie102 has been created to support this issue around this dog, see edit [44].

They were trying to ignore breed standard, other sources and pictures presented in argumentation on the talk page .

This breed being fairly unknown, not many people check that article, or try to defend it from bias .

I am a bit lost, I thougt socks are not allowed on Wikipedia.

Warrington (talk) 23:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Its MEEE!!!

edit

whazzup?!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBeardedWoman (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Sin

edit

User:IzzyandBelle is a sockpuppet of a banned user. I revert this person's edits without hesitation. --Boston (talk) 01:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Who is she? I'm sure a block could be arranged. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Big Geniuz

edit

Hello... the vandal Big Geniuz seems to have a new name Polsit and to be about merrily vandalising more articles vaguely Polish - the latest one is attempting to change Witczak to Mitczak on the Lusitanian mythology page. Paul S (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I guess that'd be Polsit (talk · contribs) --AliceJMarkham (talk) 22:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Looks like he isn't using the account actively any longer, but I've blocked it anyway. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

edit

an article about fisherqueen

edit


Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That isn't an article; it's just Peter Zed's blog, and just a copy of the conversation I had with him at AfD. It's a shame that he didn't use his knowledge of the field to write about something other than himself, but so it goes. Interesting that he selectively edited the discussion, and removed his name from the enthusiastic 'keep' comment, so it looked almost as if someone other than himself favored keeping. Interesting also that he removed all the reasons in favor of deletion, and did not link to the full discussion so that his readers could see the whole conversation. Interesting, but not useful. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Shazzam!

edit

Hi! how have you been homeslice? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.84.5 (talk) 00:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, can I be your special friend?

edit

I admire your efforts on this cyclopedia. I would like to be an editor someday. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.128.156.201 (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

it was an insult

edit

It was an insult as is : this fish stinks as do u. U didnt answer me b4 but now u do? Move on.70.108.118.234 (talk) 01:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't understand this comment. If it is important, and if you're able, feel free to repeat it in standard English. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

edit

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

  1. ^ Kutyarár Hungarian newspaper.
  2. ^ Kutyarár Hungarian newspaper.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:FisherQueen/Archive29&oldid=1083412696"