Talk:Ziprasidone

Latest comment: 3 days ago by 0dorkmann in topic Pharmacology

Where's the references?

edit

This article is seriously lacking in some references. I wanted to know where they got the references for the "Pharmacokinetics" section, because it says it's 60% effective with food, then in the next paragraph, says 50-60% effective without food. I know for a fact (as I am prescribed and do take this medication) that it hardly works when taken without food, but I don't know the exact percentages, and I can't seem to find them anywhere to fix this section, but it would seriously help if there were some cited references somewhere. There is three for the whole article. This is highly unacceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anathematized one (talkcontribs) 19:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Synthesis

edit

This article needs a section on how this chemical is synthesized. 2602:306:C518:62C0:5C06:758E:E477:60D6 (talk) 03:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzisothiazolinone

This drug appears to have this chemical as part of its molecular structure. No...no it really doesn't...at all.

Someone needs to add a section to this article on how this drug is synthesized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C518:6C40:F02A:330C:11CC:ACDB (talk) 23:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

http://www.chem24h.com/drug/synthesis/zagidjida.html

I found this information on how Geodon is synthesized. Someone should lift the information and add it to this article with attribution. 2602:306:C518:6C40:F02A:330C:11CC:ACDB (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Eliminated comment since it was a copyright violoation. We cannot have copyrighted text in wikipedia.--Garrondo (talk) 20:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


It appears that Geodon has the biocide Benzisothiazolinone as part of its molecular structure. Once again, no...no it really doesn't...at all.2602:306:C518:6C40:505A:5C79:DCDB:627E (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Side Effects

edit

Looking at Geodon's prescribing information, it does not cause side effects to the degree stated on this Wiki, as I can see. I can provide a link to the PDF. I personally take Geodon. It's been a lifesaver for me. I know personal experience may not be relevant to an Encyclopedia, but I have not had side effects to the degree listed on this page. I don't think that the listing of ALL of these side efffects is needed, as it may discourage people from taking their medication.. perhaps a separate page for the side effects, or listing only the "very common" would be better. I'll wait for someone to agree/disagree before I do anything else to the page. Sketches0993 (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moved from article

edit

I have moved the following content here because it lacks context/explanation. If anyone wants to use it to improve the article, here it is. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

[[File:Ziprasidone synthesis.png|thumb|center|700px|Ziprasidone synthesis: John A. Lowe, Arthur A. Nagel. [[Pfizer Inc.]] {{US patent|4831031}} (1989).]]

These articles need more History on this and other medicines and chemicals

edit

Who is the name of the scientist who is the one behind Geodon and all involved? These articles need this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.140.166.69 (talk) 19:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Detailed discussion of the mechanism

edit

Belong in the body of the text not the lead IMO. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Have added a brief summary. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oral administration of ziprasidone

edit

DocJames and I have been repeatedly undoing each other's edits over a very small stupid thing. He inserted a couple very awkward references to the "by mouth form" of this drug, which I merely changed to the "oral form" of this drug. Who says things like the "by mouth form"??? That certainly isn't the language we use when writing an FDA-approved product label. Not only is "by mouth form" awkward and poor English, but DocJames writes on his profile page that "My spelling and grammar are poor, so thank you for correcting them.". Verytas (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

See WP:MEDMOS. We generally use easier to understand language. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Suggest you use common language, and not language that sounds like a non-native English speaker Verytas (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Per WP:MEDMOS we use easier to understand English rather than technical English / Latin / Greek. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
A quick search of the English Wikipedia turns up exactly 3 instances of "by mouth form", and 139 instances of "oral form". Yet you - who self admits poor spelling and grammar, and who invites well-meaning correction - have now appointed yourself judge over what constitutes "easier to understand English"??? Verytas (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
We use the term "nothing by mouth" frequently and much more so than "nil par orus". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:50, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

pronunciation

edit

would someone please phonetically break this down for me so i'm able to pronounce it properly? 66.206.57.221 (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pharmacology

edit

TAAR-receptor affinities missing. --0dorkmann (talk) 08:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply