This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the X86 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Bad colors for processor registers
editThe overview of the processor registers uses bad colors, that are not clear enough for color vision deficiency. Actually, the first few colors look like they come straight from a color vision test.
Also the organization is not intuitive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.219.179.13 (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Nintendo Switch is NOT x86
editIt's clearly specified in the article page, whoever wrote that opinion clearly has some reading disability or is practicing his/her skills on NewSpeak when he/she applies for INGSOC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.87.162.72 (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- To which opinion are you referring? If you're referring to
- As of 2021, most desktop computers, laptops and game consoles (with the exception of the Nintendo Switch[1]) sold are based on the x86 architecture,
- then it explicitly notes that the switch isn't x86, complete with a reference demonstrating that. If you're referring to the claim as a whole, there's a call for a citation on that. Guy Harris (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Walton, Mark (20 December 2016). "Nintendo Switch uses Nvidia Tegra X1 SoC, clock speeds outed". Ars Technica. Retrieved 11 January 2022.