The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
More of a question: should there be a section about the US being prosecuted for war crimes? Off hand I can think of the International People's Tribunal finding Biden guilty of war crimes and I'm sure there are other instances. NyanThousand (talk) 11:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This section needs to be revised or fully removed. There are two sources, one is Truthout which isn't reliable and the other is a primary source document. The worst part is that both sources don't support any of what they are cited for. They don't mention the war in Korea let alone infecting prisoners with diseases. So the section is largely fabricated. There's also an out of place sentence in the middle of the section about coerced confessions from American POWs in North Korean captivity which is completely irrelevant to Project Artichoke. 86.187.233.133 (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
^McKinney, Katherine E.; Sagan, Scott D.; Weiner, Allen S. (2020-07-03). "Why the atomic bombing of Hiroshima would be illegal today". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 76 (4): 161. doi:10.1080/00963402.2020.1778344. ISSN0096-3402.
^Skarpelis, A. K. M. (2020). "Dresden Will Never Be Hiroshima: Morality, the Bomb and Far-Right Empathy for the Refugee". In Valencia-García, Louie Dean (ed.). Far-Right Revisionism and the End of History. doi:10.4324/9781003026433-12. ISBN9781003026433.
^Olesen, Thomas (3 December 2019). "The Hiroshima memory complex". British Journal of Sociology. 71 (1): 81. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12717.
