This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
How odd, I have a cite that says she suffered a small boiler explosion in this date and rushed back to Norfolk to transfer the dead & injured. Anyone know what the facts are? [1]
It is simply remarkable two cites mention the same date. Outside of the official records we have no idea where she was on 7 November for example. This says something about the reliability of sources or something. --''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 01:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is rather strange; I wonder if the ship's logs could be tracked down to figure out which one is correct. I suppose both could've happened the same day and the NYT article simply omitted mention of the rescue effort (or perhaps the ship was sent out later in the day, and the reporter didn't hear about it before writing the article). Parsecboy (talk) 10:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
