Talk:Trois nouvelles études

Merger

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge Jubilee♫clipman 14:47, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

---

I suggest that this article or section can be merged into 3 Études, No. 1 (Chopin), 3 Études, No. 2 (Chopin) and 3 Études, No. 3 (Chopin). It can be, I don't mind: these three in one, or this one into these three. OboeCrack (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree, so someone do it already! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.246.195.95 (talk) 00:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Agree This was discussed previously (see here), but the matter was never resolved. These 3 works are not of the same order as the other 24, so there never could be a major article for each one individually. The three seperate articles should be brought over here are merged with this article. The articles for the opp 10 and 25 Etudes could easily be expanded over time, on the other hand, so they sould remain despite some only being a line long at present. Jubilee♫clipman 17:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Have cleaned up the tag on this page so it doesn't need to redirect, and added tags to the other pages. Jubilee♫clipman 17:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

One final thought: the text on this page and on the three individual pages is identical, as are the sound files, so all we need to do is delete the other pages. Agreed? Jubilee♫clipman 18:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

I also prefer one sole article rather than three separate ones. I think the others shouldn't be deleted, they all should redirect to this article. Kadellar (talk) 17:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Agree, it makes sense to merge them --Sketchee (talk) 13:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Numbers

There seem to be differences in the numbering between publishers. The Scholtz/Peters score at IMSLP has them numbered as 1) F minor, 2) D-flat major, 3) A-flat major. All the others have them as 1) F minor, 2) A-flat major, 3) D-flat major. I suggest to stay away from the Scholtz/Peters score, listed as #112922. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

The Henle urtext edition has the D-flat major as Number 2. I believe this is correct.

Henle catalog them as KK II b/3, numbers 1 2 and 3. cagliost (talk) 10:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)