Talk:SS Mauna Loa

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured articleSS Mauna Loa is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2021.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 26, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 12, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
November 5, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
November 17, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 2, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in August 1936, the Matson Navigation Company cargo ship SS Mauna Loa came to the aid of a windjammer that was crewed by Sea Scouts and had been missing for two weeks?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Mauna Loa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I am placing this article on hold. First of all, there is a very large number of red links. Also, the prose is lacking references. Alert me on my talk page when you are finished. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 16:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I posted questions for you regarding this hold on your talk page. Please feel free to respond in either place. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copy of discussion

Thank you for taking the time to review SS Mauna Loa for consideration as a good article. I'm more than happy to work to improve the article, but am stumped as to what prose is lacking citations. Can you clarify that for me please? Also, could you let me know where the guideline that addresses redlinks is in Wikipedia:Good article criteria? Maybe I'm reading it differently than the consensus, but I don't see anything that addresses redlinks. Many thanks in advance. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The prose is the lead section. The redlinks are not necessary for GA, the article just looks more professional. I'm sorry, I should have clarified both of these. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 17:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The style that I prefer does not clutter the lead with citations (unless there is a particularly compelling reason to do so). This is a style that is sanctioned at WP:LEADCITE and is in use in a great many featured articles.
Also, as an FYI, I moved your original review on to the review page at Talk:SS Mauna Loa/GA1 (the link generated from {{GAN}}). — Bellhalla (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
End of copy
promoted by Redmarkviolinist (talk · contribs) 15:16, 26 September 2008. Woody (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SS Mauna Loa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SS Mauna Loa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SS Mauna Loa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply