Talk:Richard Mead

Richard Mead.

I'm little bit confused on other's edits, is it sure that He killed young womens? And it's like speculation I guess.*~Daniel~* ☎ 02:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

What's an "Independent divine"? Some sort of theological title?

--babbage 02:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

It should mention that he was a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians. TwoPairsOfBoots (talk) 17:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Mead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723190044/http://freemasonry.lmfm.net/os/wp-content/resources/frs_freemasons_complete_jan2010.pdf to http://freemasonry.lmfm.net/os/wp-content/resources/frs_freemasons_complete_jan2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Category: English astrologers

No mention of this in the article. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Question re: Religious Views

The following sentence in religious views seems a little strange to me, but I'd prefer a more seasoned wiki editor to take a look. "Yet, Verses 28-34, in the Gospel of Mathew, Chapter 8, specifically state that Jesus was spoken to by the 'demon', disproving its inanimateness; it personified itself by telling Jesus that his name was "Legion", and asked Him to relocate him into the nearby pigs. Jesus replied "Go", and after entering them Mathew records they then ran over the mountainside." It seems like someone added an original argument against Mead's view of biblical demons. The language of "disproving its inanimateness" sounds like original research. 108.45.102.50 (talk) 14:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)