Talk:Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps

undoing specious edits by User:GWFrog

I have now twice undone recent spurious and uncalled for edits by User:GWFrog. A month ago, he claimed Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps had gone defunct. I called on him to cite it before including it. He wanted to edit-war but finally relented and added what seemed to be halfway toward a cite. I left it at that. This weekend, User:Racine1927, who seems to be connected to the organization, said no, they're still alive, as I suspected all along. User:GWFrog shows up and promptly rewrites User:Racine1927's clean text into unnecessary prose. I undid it. It's not what the member said and it obscures what the member was clearly saying. User:GWFrog looks on the verge of editwarring again. User:GWFrog has no more credibility in this issue, having been caught in an untruth. Instead of rewriting User:Racine1927's text, User:GWFrog should at best apologize to User:Racine1927, and at least drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass. There is nothing more for you here except to move on.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

I am going to, one more time, revert your edit to the factually supported text. If you revert it again, I will file a Wikipedia:Dispute resolution request concerning your actively edit warring and violating the three-revert rule.

I tried to be nice, politely explaining to you in detail how my edit was the correct one, but you started swearing in the edit summary and ranting on Talk:Racine Scouts Drum and Bugle Corps. I am not out to engage in an edit war; I am only trying to edit in the proper manner. If you cannot do the same, we will take this situation to the administrators. GWFrog (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GWFrog/Archive just parking this here to bring up during your next specious edit. Have a nice day!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

"Whatever, the facts"?

Fredref123, facts are what we deal in on Wikipedia, not guesswork. And no, his purple prose is crap. Read Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing#Creative_expression. "did not take the field" could mean they actually showed up and decided not to participate after all. "did not participate in DCI Summer Music Games" leaves no ambiguity or guesswork. There's no "neutrality" in this issue at all. Facts are what we deal with on Wikipedia. If you and GWFrog want to write a blog somewhere, go do that. Not here.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

You know what? Scratch that-you're a ringer he called in. You've made a total of three edits in a year not counting this one. You're a phony.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GWFrog/Archive just parking this here to bring up during your next specious edit. Have a nice day!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

I Undid revision 759944296 by GWFrog per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GWFrog/Archive, you have no business on this article-you have no credibility. I will revert you on sight. Take it to an admin, I dare you.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppeteer GWFrog is at it again-clearly you have no shame, luckily I'm monitoring you. You have no business changing wording on this article since I outed you for sockpuppetry. I will continue to out you each time you change the wording of this article to your twisted POV, which is not supported by the citation given.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)