Talk:Punica (poem)

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Phoenicia Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I think this page needs a substantial rewrite.

Alot of the text is straight from MacKail and it is surely overly negative in its drubbing of the text of the poem

http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_text_mackail_iii_ii_a.htm

Cpnlsn88 (talk) 14:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure it does need a rewrite. I'd transferred the text from the article about the poem's author, with marginal updates for publication history. I'm not the one to rewrite it, though; I'm not a Latin poetry scholar.--Zimriel (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am going to start rewriting this article and I am a Latin poetry scholar. Jdf8 (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Annoying tags

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

More than forty tags ^{[citation needed]} are really maniacal. After the fourth or fifth the reader has certainly understood the problem of the article, as well as the pedantry of the person who put them. Reduce!--Hyphantes (talk) 23:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic