Talk:Preußisches Obertribunal
 | Preußisches Obertribunal is currently a Law good article nominee. Nominated by WatkynBassett (talk) at 06:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: Prussian supreme court (1703–1879) |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Preußisches Obertribunal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Preußisches Obertribunal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- ... that it has been argued that hardly any decision has stirred the discussion of German criminal law scholarship more than an over 150-year-old case of the Preußisches Obertribunal? Source: Haft, Fritjof; Eisele, Jörg (2003). "Wie wirkt sich ein error in persona des Haupttäters auf den Gehilfen aus?". Gedächtnisschrift für Rolf Keller (in German). Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81–101. ISBN 9783161477508.
- Reviewed:
Will reviewTemplate:Did you know nominations/Ema Zajmović (ongoing) done
- Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by WatkynBassett (talk). Self-nominated at 18:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Preußisches Obertribunal; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
@WatkynBassett: Good article. Agf on german sources. waiting on qpq. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Thanks a lot for reviewing this so quickly! I provided the missing QPQ. WatkynBassett (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- WatkynBassett could you please provide a relevant quote from the German source? I think the hook needs trimming a bit for reader impact but I don't want to misrepresent what the source says. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29:The relevant quote is: Es handelt sich um einen Beitrag zu der berühmten "Rose-Rosahl" Entscheidung des Preußischen Obertribunals aus dem Jahre 1859. Kaum eine Entscheidung hat die strafrechtswissenschaftliche Diskussion so sehr bewegt wie diese, die sich mit der Frage zu beschäftigen hatte, wie sich ein error in persona des Angestifteten auf die Strafbarkeit des Anstifters auswirkt:. Hope this helps to get this hook promoted! WatkynBassett (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- WatkynBassett could you please provide a relevant quote from the German source? I think the hook needs trimming a bit for reader impact but I don't want to misrepresent what the source says. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
