Talk:Pot-holder
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Please keep this article
editThere is much to write about pot-holders, enough to make an article. This is just a start. /Yvwv (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- You don't need to use the "hangon" tag - prods can be contested by anyone for any reason by removing the tag. Natalie (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate sources
editHello all, I am fairly new to Wikipedia, so I personally haven't figured out how to do this yet, but if someone could merge the duplicate sources on this page, that would be wonderful. Sources 4, 6, and 7 are identical to each other, as are 8, 9, and 11; 13, 14, and 16 also need to be merged. If I do figure out how to merge sources, I will do that at a later date. ~Komet (talk) 04:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
I think the Wool section needs a go-over
editIn the wool section it mentions wool as being able to withstand high temperatures, but twice later it says that wool has a low ignition temperature. Later it mentions an ignition temperature of 1000° Fahrenheit. My oven doesn't go that high! (Just checked, only 550° Fahrenheit.) Later the article mentions that the "char" forms a semi-liquid state. Is it actually semi-liquid, an actual semifluid, or would another descriptive term work better? I think this section needs to be gone over by someone that knows a lot about wool. [email protected] 75.172.28.201 (talk) 22:32, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Conflicting information
editUnder style development it states "he earliest records of pot-holders in the United States stem from the early 1900s" but the image on the page is tagged "A mid-1800s abolitionist pot-holder, from the Smithsonian Museum of American History" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:4547:867B:B110:CBD2:DA3:A202 (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 9 November 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that Pot-holder be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log |  |
Pot-holder → ? – "Pot-holder" with a hyphen seems to be by far the least used version. Unfortunate, both pot holder and potholder are very close in usage: Google ngrams, Google Trends (shows "pot holder" being about 50% more searched for than "potholder" in the past few years, before then they were nearly identical), 1,970 Google scholar for "pot holder" (which includes pot-holder but a quick skim finds "pot holder" far out numbers it), 1,450 Google scholar for "potholder". Dictionaries that I looked at are 5-2 in favor of "potholder": "potholder": Collins (which labels it as British), Cambridge (which labels it as "mainly US"), Oxford Learner's (Which labels it as "(North American English)", American Heritage, and Dictionary.com; while for "pot holder": M-W; OED. I'm not a huge fan of just going by dictionary but perhaps give how similar ngrams and such are, I'd lean toward "potholder" which is also the direction ngramas has started to move toward, although "pot holder" was much more common from the 1860s until the late 1960s. I also don't think there seems to be sufficient English variety affinity for either spaced or not to justify using the uncommon hyphenated version. Skynxnex (talk) 16:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)