Talk:Pokémon Diamond and Pearl

Latest comment: 5 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Good articlePokémon Diamond and Pearl has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2005Articles for deletionKept
August 19, 2006Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 11, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 9, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
October 28, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 24, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
January 25, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
June 16, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 5, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

"Pokemon platinum; Looker" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon platinum; Looker. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Surf Elite Four Glitch" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Surf Elite Four Glitch. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Pokemon diamond cheats" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pokemon diamond cheats. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20#Pokemon diamond cheats until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Beta

edit

A few months ago, the beta of Pokemon Diamond and Pearl has been leaked, revealing many sprites of what some gen 4 pokemon use to look like. Should we add this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The great Jay (talkcontribs) 01:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Tiagaga" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tiagaga and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Tiagaga until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Shimucchi" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Shimucchi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Shimucchi until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 15:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Potential GA demotion

edit

This 2007 promotion (last reviewed in 2009) does not seem to meet the criteria. I have tagged several areas in the article where more sourcing is needed. The subsections of Legacy also need to be expanded or merged together. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No consensus to delist ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed tags and after a quick skim you will see other places that aren’t tagged but deserve cn tags. Also there are 2 maintenance tags but both are about expansions. 48JCLTALK 01:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'd be willing to work on improvements to the article in order for it to comply with Good Article standards. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@48JCL I've fixed up the spots needing expansion and additionally cited several sections with citation needed tags (As well as Pokémon Platinum's section). Could you clarify what other spots need improvement? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Could [1] be moved to the body, making the lead more summary style? I’ll come back with more. 48JCL TALK 21:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@48JCL what else needs to be done? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.