Former featured article candidatePac-Man is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 28, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 22, 2009, May 22, 2010, May 22, 2013, May 22, 2016, May 22, 2019, and May 22, 2020.
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Cheating without rigging software or hardware

edit

In 1982 or so, I watched two guys on different days get high scores by following what each of them said was a description he had read somewhere. Basically, advice on how to move through early levels safely by pausing, reversing, etc. at key moments. Each guy actually was following a different "script" I noticed. It might be useful to add a section on this kind of player networking for historical interest, because it occurred long before there was an internet. Martindo (talk) 01:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2022

edit

Under Merchandise, what's supposed to be bumper stickers is 'bumber stickers.' Thanks. 108.29.191.228 (talk) 10:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Done--Belbury (talk) 10:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tiny bit of subjective writing

edit

Hiya, wanted to point out a little bit of subjective writing in the Film section, specifically the Black Mirror part, that should be removed.

"cool conspiracy, but likely untrue."

Thanks in advance. 155.4.83.214 (talk) 19:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done; the whole paragraph is a close paraphrase of a source and is only discussing a minor aspect of a work, so I've removed it. Belbury (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Puck Man and vandalism?

edit

Do we have a more official source for this? We've all heard it before but it just sounds to me like a myth or urban legend. The name apparently was changed from "Puck Man" to "Pac Man" early on, but this could be due to some other reason, like, maybe "Puck Man" was simply an early mistake which they later corrected. The Wikipedia article also sort of contradicts itself, because in the second paragraph it says "Pac Man" ("Pakku Man") is supposed to be a play on the Japanese onomatopoeia "paku paku" (which sounds a lot more plausible to me: I mean why would they name him "Puck" Man when the game's got pretty much nothing to do with pucks but a whole lot to do with opening and closing the mouth and gobbling stuff up? However, there should be a source cited for the "paku paku" as well, because it's completely uncited and might just be speculation). 2603:8080:C6F0:48B0:0:0:0:1468 (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's not true, just an urban legend. However, since some online gaming rag "reported" it as fact Wikipedia will treat it as the canon gospel until the end of time and any attempt to fix it will be quickly reverted. Just another example of why this site is a trash heap. 24.230.161.142 (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Have some optimism, Wikipedia is always open to reviewing the reliability of sources, and it wouldn't take much to reframe the story as being disputed, or an urban legend - just some additional sources that have cast doubt on it. Have any books or magazines written about it?
The "puck" story is currently sourced to a 2002 Random House book The Ultimate History of Video Games. Belbury (talk) 17:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
That’s, like, just your opinion man. Those who have done the research and interviewed those who were at Namco and Midway at the time, like say the authors of Pac-Man: Birth of an Icon, know it is true. Now that pizza story on the other hand… Indrian (talk) 20:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You don't even need to look at recent interviews about this subject to know it's not a recently invented legend. From Cash Box, December 17, 1983 page 36:
Recalling the discovery of Pac-Man, “the most successful ‘name’ in the history of the coin machine business,” Hank [Ross, co-founder of Midway] told about how he and Stan Jarocki first saw the game in Japan, where it was called “PuckMan.” The first part of the name, because it “rhymed with a nasty word” just wouldn’t do, said Hank, so we submitted 10 names to Japan and they telexed back their disapproval of all 10 and their suggestion of “Pac,” thus Pac-Man the name was born when Midway licensed the game — the rest is history!
Pretty definitive that - even if there's debate on who came up with the name - it was absolutely changed for the reason that is given in most other sources. That's the guy who ran Midway at the time giving the story, very close to the events in question. The History of How We Play (talk) 02:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Split screen playability

edit

I seem to remember reading somewhere (JoyStik perhaps) that the split screen IS playable. Noticed the article says it isn't. I'll see if I can track down the article. Thoughts?THX1136 (talk) 16:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Japanese computer ports

edit

A wide variety of Japanese computer ports of Pac-Man exist on systems such as the NEC PC-8801, NEC PC-9801, Sharp X1, Sharp MZ, FM-7, FM-8, etc. I feel it's necessary to mention these versions of the game under genres, but as I'm not a registered user, I can not make such changes, so just bringing awareness to the fact and hoping someone make these improvements in the future. Pengo82 (talk) 04:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pac-Man MS-DOS port explanation

edit

I'd like to clarify that there's one platform missing in the platforms section of the quick details of the article. You know that Pac-Man once had an MS-DOS port for one of those days where computers had just that operating system? Well, when I try to add just that detail to the article, I'm not autoconfirmed! So, can anyone who is registered and autoconfirmed help with this? I purely appreciate your support, and I'm awaiting your responses. Opera9441 (talk) 17:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The IBM PC version, by Atarisoft, is already mentioned in the article. Do you mean some different version? Krótki (talk) 09:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply