Talk:National Organization for Marriage

Latest comment: 1 month ago by NatGertler in topic NOW - dead?

990 disclosure

edit

The HRC is filing a complaint claiming that NOM is not releasing their most recent 990. We should keep an eye on this, not just for coverage that makes it worthy of inclusion, but because that coverage may give fresh financial stats. --Nat Gertler (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is now a moot point since the IRS now publishes 990 filings. A copy of NOM's most recent filing (FY 2021) can be found here. Nowa (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on National Organization for Marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on National Organization for Marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on National Organization for Marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on National Organization for Marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 28 external links on National Organization for Marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

alleged vandalism

edit

An editor has repeatedly tried to insert the claim that the Free Speech Bus was vandalized, using this USA Today article as source. The problem with that is, despite the headline, the article never claims in USA Today's voice that the vandalism actually took place. It says that someone claims the bus was vandalized, and specifically refers to it as "alleged vandalism". As such, the claim is not properly sourced. I am removing it again. Please do not re-add it without an appropriate reliable source being included. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

That person is me and I just undid your mistake. This is how it looked like before I first made an edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Organization_for_Marriage&oldid=835151776#Free_Speech_Bus The article talked about vandalism before I even made my first edit.

You undid my edit and completely removed the part about vandalism. And you removed my source too which says that NOM worked with IOF... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enemyofjokes (talkcontribs) 22:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you can't figure it out, the other source, that I didn't add, talks about vandalism https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/03/31/an-anti-transgender-free-speech-bus-is-rolling-through-the-east-coast-sparking-protests-and-a-video-game/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c8f67feccf1f — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enemyofjokes (talkcontribs) 22:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
If the fact that the IOF was involved was what you were trying to reference, then you put the reference near that, not several sentences later. I have moved it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
From WaPo, stated in their voice as fact:
Lionel(talk) 23:56, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

2M4M section?

edit

What happened to the entire section on the 2M4M section, visible here, and one of the earliest pushes by this group? It was one of the first things that brought it both attention & ridicule and was widely documented. See this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Organization_for_Marriage&oldid=283591789
It seems very odd that it's been wiped from the page, given other less significant/noted campaigns that are featured here. JamesG5 (talk) 04:55, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sometime around 2013, the heading was changed to "Advertising campaigns", and since then successive edits have changed some of the content. But I think much of it is still there. Search the page for "M4M". - Nunh-huh 08:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I need to read more carefully.  :-) JamesG5 (talk) 09:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Eastman still Chairman of NOM?

edit

A question relevant to this page is being raised at Talk:John_Eastman#Still_chairman_of_NOM? -- I suggest we keep any discussion there rather than splitting it over two pages. -- Nat Gertler (talk) Nat Gertler (talk) 14:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

NOW - dead?

edit

We need to keep an eye on anything that might be used to establish when NOW is officially dead. At the moment, their web page still bears a 2023 copyright... which is appropriate because there does not appear to be anything new on there for over a year. Their front-page campaigns are against a pair of congressional resolutions from March of 2023, against Disney's opposition to the "Don't Say Gay" legislation from 2022, and against Burger King's support of the HRC in 2021. Their blog page has zero entries, their most recent financial report on their reports page is for 2021. (Added later: The IRS has tax records through the 2022 tax year, but I assume that they should have one for 2023 by now. For the Education Fund, tax records end with the 2021 tax year.) News search for the group's name finds that the latest reference for anything being done under their name is over a year old. They've certainly become insignificant, their website moribund, but it's hard to tell when that crosses to technically non-existent and we should past-tense their descriptor. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply