Talk:Najeh Davenport
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nicknames
editI'm restoring the word "quickly," as the ESPN article -- dated weeks after Davenport joined the Steelers -- notes that he had already been given the moniker by fans. I think a few weeks constitutes "quickly." I think you can agree, either way, that some of the changes you've made to this page (and others) have not been entirely helpful and at times border on frivolous.
Either way, I think it would be helpful in the future if any further disputes over trivial points about this article were discussed here instead of being repeatedly reverted.Bdb484 (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)BDB484
- I don't agree with your assessment, and I would hope other observers would take a similar position as to what I have. This is an encyclopedia entry. It's not a play-by-play of all the nicknames fans have come up with for a guy who did the kind of misdeed Davenport did. You'll also find that personal attacks like the ones in your edit summaries and failure to assume good faith, as you have done above, are policy violations on Wikipedia. So no, I wouldn't agree that the changes I've made "have not been entirely helpful and at times border on frivolous." Now, adding the word "quickly" back into the article even though there is no source for it is frivolous. Why is that necessary? The wording is good enough without all of the extraneous commentary. Chicken Wing (talk) 23:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Another note, using the term "quickly" probably qualifies as original research. It's not in the original source, so saying "quickly" is a Wikipedia editor's interpretation of the source, which is probably not preferable in this situation. You should also be careful not to use misleading edit summaries, as your previous edit summary to the article was inflammatory given that I didn't misinterpret the source. The source doesn't use the word, thus it's not sourced. Chicken Wing (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Najeh Davenport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081226123131/http://www.packers.com/history/all_time_roster/player/davenport_najeh_2002-05/ to http://www.packers.com/history/all_time_roster/player/davenport_najeh_2002-05/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080608143333/http://news.steelers.com/team/player/69126/ to http://news.steelers.com/team/player/69126/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090122082659/http://www.colts.com/sub.cfm?page=bio&player_id=555 to http://www.colts.com/sub.cfm?page=bio&player_id=555
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202092911/http://hurricanesports.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/davenport_najeh00.html to http://hurricanesports.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/davenport_najeh00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)