Mizo Chieftainship is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by Mmis325 (talk) at 12:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: System of indigenous cultural administration of the Mizo people |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mizo Chieftainship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Mmis325 (talk · contribs) 12:13, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sangsangaplaz (talk · contribs) 10:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure which one you are referring to, can you elaborate? Is it the paragraph you removed? If so, I have re-added it within a better context and sourced properly this time. It was out of place I admit. Mmis325 (talk) 12:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for forgetting about this review but yes if has been fixed. I won't forget it in the future. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 09:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- All good! No rush or anything, I'm happy for your help regardless :) Mmis325 (talk) 11:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for forgetting about this review but yes if has been fixed. I won't forget it in the future. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 09:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Precolonial Chieftainship
editThe first paragraph of this chapter in the main article looks misplaced. Shouldn't it be in the Mizo Chiefdom in modern history?
Combining paragraphs
editCould
"In the administration, the chief would cooperate with various individuals to achieve his duties. Among the most important of these individuals were the chief's elders, also known as Lal upate or upa. The chief could choose who to appoint to this position and how many individuals could fit this capacity. The elders did not possess the ability to question decisions or criticise the chief and typically held meetings at the Chief's house while drinking buhzu (rice beer). An Upa who became favoured by the chief for their conduct would be granted permission to set up a hamlet near the village known as a khawper. Upa who are given headmen positions act as lesser chiefs known as Belrawh mualkil and if they're granted privileges like sachhiah (meat tax), they are known as sangal khawnghrang. The most important Upa is known as Upamin and is perceived as the chief's deputy . The brothers of the chief would also enjoy prestige by association if they did not rule any village. They were exempted from paying the rice paddy tax known as fathang. They would be given the first choice on choosing plots for jhumming and cultivation."
be shortened and combined in a cohesive manner while retaining most of the info?