Talk:Milorad Ekmečić/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Peacemaker67 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 22:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I can take this on over the next few days. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:40, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit

That's it for a first pass, overall a very nice article. More comments to come later. As always, many of my comments are subjective and some are probably due to a lack of knowledge on my part. Happy to discuss any/all in more detail. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Initial run through done, a couple of things to follow up. Will ping when done. Thanks for taking a look. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
G'day Eddie891, I reckon I might be done. Have another look and see what you think? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Prose looks good-- I'll do a source spotcheck shortly. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • I checked just about all of the english-language sourcing and referencing lines up perfectly. You could afford to be more specific with journal articles (i.e. Ramet 2007 is just citing p. 46, not the whole range and as far as I can tell Nielsen 2020 cites only the first page of the article), but that won't hold up passing by itself. This article is well written, broad in coverage, well referenced, neutral, illustrated, and otherwise meets the GA criteria. Happy to pass. Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Fixed Ramet, the problem with Nielsen is that it doesn't show pages. Thanks again. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply