Jurassic Park was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I was thinking we could add 2 More Sections including "Chronological Order" and "Interactives". We could also add a part where all the movies, shows, films, and interactives are all in one big list of Release Order. I also heard a new shows coming up thats a sequel to Camp Cretaceous called "Jurassic World: Chaos Theory" Bananawiki123456! (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
For the films, the chronological and release order is the same, and they're all covered here already. The infobox also lists all the films and shows. The only interactive that I know of is the Camp Cretaceous special episode, which I've added here. It doesn't need its own section. The sequel show is also mentioned. AJFU (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, We need a section about how this film and its sequels have changed forever the perception of dinosaurs for the general public. And this is not just in the Western world. It is worldwide phenomenon. FYI Jurassic Park was one of the first American movie to be dubbed in Hindi. There is clearly "Dinosaurs before JP" and after. Everything changed. Yann (talk) 21:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I don't think it's appropriate to label the Jurassic World series as a "tetratology". The three Jurassic World movies were a unified trilogy whose story clearly ended with Dominion, which the article points out multiple times. The new film is clearly meant to a spin that's separate from the other three. We should change it back to "Jurassic World Trilogy" for the first three films and "Spin off" for the new one 2600:4040:A5B1:A800:E4BB:54FF:FEE0:1E47 (talk) 01:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, the previous trilogy and the new film appear to be separate things. Sources aren't using "tetralogy" to describe the series, so neither should we. However, sources also aren't referring to it as a "spin-off".
Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've modified this edit to focus on the films and the two Netflix shows, which are obviously part of the same canon. The canonicity of everything else seems questionable and is hardly brought up in reliable sources (it's mostly fansites and forum posts). There is something that Trevorrow calls "soft canon", which might be where some of this stuff falls under, but I couldn't find anything further on this.
The Lego shows are apparently not canon ([1], [2]), and the games are a bit of a mixed bag. According to this, Jurassic Park: The Game was originally canon when it was developed, but I guess it's now ambiguous as to whether that's still the case. For what it's worth, some elements of the game were referenced in marketing websites for the Jurassic World films ([3]), but I don't think that canonizes the whole game, and I don't know if the sites themselves are considered totally canon and meant to be taken seriously, or if they're more just for fun. Jurassic World Aftermath was canon, until it wasn't ([4]). Other games, including Jurassic World Evolution, aren't canon either ([5],[6]). AJFU (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
