Talk:Ji Gong

Validity of his family name should be questioned.....

• http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%E6%9D%8E%E4%BF%AE%E5%85%83+%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC&hl=zh-CN&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=

--58.38.44.105 (talk) 09:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=Ji+Gong+Li+Xiuyuan+zen+master&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.44.105 (talk) 09:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=Daoji+Li+Xiuyuan+zen&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--58.38.44.105 (talk) 09:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?q=%E5%AE%8B%E6%9C%9D%E6%9D%8E%E5%A7%93&hl=zh-CN&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 09:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E6%9D%8E+%E6%B3%95%E7%9C%BC%E7%A6%85%E5%AE%97+%E5%AE%8B%E6%9C%9D+filetype%3Apdf&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=%E6%B3%95%E7%9C%BC+%E5%AE%8B&num=10&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2%E5%AD%A6%E6%9C%AF&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&hl=zh-CN

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Google has not been working well for the following search, so that I use baidu instead

• http://www.baidu.com/s?bs=%CB%CE%B3%AF%C0%EE%D0%D5&f=8&wd=%22%CB%CE%B3%AF%C0%EE%D0%D5%22

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 09:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://www.baidu.com/s?tn=baiduadv&bs=site%3A%28edu%29+%CB%CE%B3%AF+%22%C0%EE%D0%D5%BA%CD%C9%D0%22&f=8&wd=site%3A%28edu%29+%CB%CE%B3%AF%C0%EE%D0%D5%BA%CD%C9%D0+

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 09:42, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://www.sogou.com/web?q=%CB%CE%B3%AF%C0%EE%D0%D5%BA%CD%C9%D0&query=%CB%CE%B3%AF%C0%EE%D0%D5%BA%CD%C9%D0+site%3Aedu&fieldtitle=&fieldcontent=&fieldstripurl=&bstype=&exclude=&sitequery=edu&located=0&tro=off&filetype=&num=10

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 09:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

---

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC+%E4%BF%97%E5%A7%93%E6%9D%8E&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E9%81%93%E6%B5%8E+%E4%BF%97%E5%A7%93%E6%9D%8E&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

From above info, a few is seriously published except for 河南师范大学学报 rather than ones from 浙江大学府. Why is that...??? What is the reason behind the tricky.....??? --222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

More academic info about the figure.....

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=%E9%81%93%E6%B5%8E&num=10&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2%E5%AD%A6%E6%9C%AF&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&hl=zh-CN

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E5%9C%A8%E6%A0%87%E9%A2%98%3A+%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC+%E4%B8%B4%E6%B5%8E&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E9%81%93%E6%B5%8E+%E4%B8%B4%E6%B5%8E&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 10:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

---

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?q=%E9%81%93%E6%B5%8E+%E6%B2%B3%E5%8D%97&hl=zh-CN&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 11:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%22%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC%22+%E6%B2%B3%E5%8D%97&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 11:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%22%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC%22+%E6%B5%99%E6%B1%9F&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E9%81%93%E6%B5%8E+%E6%B5%99%E6%B1%9F&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

---

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%22%E9%81%93%E6%B5%8E%22+%E5%B1%B1%E4%B8%9C&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 11:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

• http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&q=%E6%B5%8E%E5%85%AC+%E5%B1%B1%E4%B8%9C&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

--222.67.213.86 (talk) 11:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Could the Chinese history scholars do some thorough researches for this figure please...??? --222.67.213.86 (talk) 11:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)