Talk:Instant Insanity

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 70.89.176.249 in topic Name?

Magnets

edit

I used to have a set that had magnets inside that would repel each other unless the cubes were in the solved configuration. Anyone know anything about this?

Graph confusion

edit

this question from eric osman at rcn dot com 17-feb-2014 : The article says "there is an edge between two vertices if the two colors are on the opposite sides of the cube" . Shouldn't that say "both cubes" or something else ? As written, it is confusing to me, because the two vertices can come from two different cubes, so which of those two cubes are you talking about when you say "the cube"  ?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericosman (talkcontribs) 22:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

No, it should say "the cube" since the two colors are on opposing sides of this one cube under current evaluation. Other cubes may have the same exact colors on respective opposing sides also, in which case they will add similar paths to the master graph. Thus in the master graph there my be either: 1. No lines connecting two color nodes (meaning no cubes have these colors in opposing sides), or 2. Only one (numbered) line (meaning there is only one cube with such opposing colors, and the line number corresponds to that cube's number), or 3. More than one (mumbered) line (meaning that there are more than one cube with the corresponding opposing colors,and each contributes a numbered line that connects the two colored nodes). Shimon Yanowitz (talk) 00:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

MacMahon cubes

edit

The text says "The puzzles use a subset of the 30 cubes devised by Percy Alexander MacMahon", but this is incorrect; each of MacMahon's cubes is six-colored. They don't seem to be related at all, except for both puzzles having cubes with the faces colored. I'm removing that line. Joule36e5 (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Instant Insanity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Name?

edit

I have several sets of these cubes, some nearly 50 years old, but none of them are called "Instant Insanity" -- they are all called "Devil's Dice". The cubes are made of wood, and painted.

"Instant Insanity" is the name that Parker Brothers gave to their plastic version of the puzzle in 1967. but this puzzle is much older than that, and may stretch back to medeival times. A history section would be in order, and also some mention of the other names which the puzzle has gone by (such as "Devil's Dice"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 01:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply