This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
Latest comment: 11 hours ago13 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@Storye book:... Thank you for reviewing. I need to recheck the hook fact as the source is not correct and does not correspondance to Sher-Gil's letters. Will ping you once checked. Sorry for this. Whispyhistory (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
The author of the painting, Amrita Sher-Gil, died in 1941, so the painting entered into the publish domain in India in 2001. Regrettably, because it was still protected by copyright in India in 1996 (the date of the URAA), it's still protected by copyright in the US until 2033. Given the extensive discussion of the painting within the article, I think there's a pretty good argument that we can use this painting as fair use on enWiki. Rather than nominating this for deletion on commons, I'm pinging Whispyhistory so you can {{SD|g7}} this on commons and re-upload locally as a non-free file. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay, here's my line of thought. ownership of the painting was transferred or "communicated to the public", meaning it was published. It was published outside of the United States, it seems- India, specifically. The author died in 1941, so Indian copyright law protected her works until 2001. Therefore, it was still protected by copyright in its home country in 1996. Therefore, it had its copyright restored in the United States by the URAA. That being said, international copyright law is....complicated. Have I missed anything super obvious or made any illogical jumps? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 11:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Both tags on the image file say that the image is currently in the public domain. Are you saying that one or both of the tags is untrue? If that is the case, what are your grounds for saying that your theory is the correct one, and that the Commons tags are incorrect in principle? Looking at the first tag on the page, it strikes me that you are perhaps not aware of the bit of law which that tag is using? Storye book (talk) 20:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Nice article, and a great picture which will look good on the main page. Thank you for this.
for ALT1, with offline citation taken AGF. Thank you, Whispyhistory. Storye book (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, Whispyhistory. Good to go. Storye book (talk) 09:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)